I understand this is a complete breach of etiquette, but I am escalating this to the coup de grace of all dares, the sinister triple-dog-dare.
PS: Nice review.
Mark -- Oils/extractions aren't really my thing (just give me some nice fresh delicious flower) but I've tried a few, and Herbie is a complete champ with the concentrates. A little bit on the pad, and as @didolgi said:
@spincut -- Few things here: First is Herbie is much more precise in temp. Not only in resting (bowl is in stasis), but -- more importantly --
when the bowl is under load. It's the easier half to design a device whose resting temp is in at least in the ball park of where the user thinks it should be. It's significantly more difficult to make a device maintain temp under draw. Most other devices will do one of two things: Drop temp upon draw as heated air in the chamber is replaced by room-temp air; or spike in temp as pre-heated replaces the air in the chamber. In one case the temp you think you are getting is actually (effectively) below what you think it is, in the other the temp become higher than the user expects. Pretty much every vape I've dropped a thermocouple in has shown one of these two behaviors under measurement. Because of this, I pretty much take just about any reported temp on most devices as a "guideline" for the general area it is in. (Even my beloved portable is subject to a potential large thermal drop. But I know this and modify my technique to minimize this, and get pretty decent thermal response.) But don't trust the reported temp as anything other than a ballpark.
Not the Herbie. The Herbie demonstrates a nearly flat curve when subject to load from standing, and then back again. Amazing.
Also, point two: Not *ALL* of us live in the high temps. A little bit of observational bias with some of the crowd here. Some people are indeed targeting compounds at higher temps (and even higher than what you listed), but by no means is that all of us. I'm a lower-temp kinda bloke, unless it is end of the night but even then I won't go above 392°F.
PS: I wouldn't hold off on getting a unit. The Limited Edition is still available now (technically, although *we* have had it for half of a year, it's really only been out for a short time). There are no major fixes needed, and it will be a long time before we will see a 2.0… the next version of Herbie you see will be the non-Limited Edition version, so I would jump on it now!
Yup.
Ok, that was a lot to take in. But I'm not so sure it really addresses my confusion? Mostly because, based on what you're saying, it means the Herbalizer should run less hot, not more hot. Firstly, I was under the impression the Volcano digit at least was decently accurate, so guidline or otherwise, it's margin for error is decently slim as well. And if the heating element were NEARER to the base, I would imagine that would only allow for cooler than needed temps, not hotter. So yeah, I'm still a little confused as to why people are running stuff so hot, ESPECIALLY since it can keep the temp so much easier than, say, a volcano (again though, it does seem to do a better job than most even still in that regard).
Case in point, even with the guildine idea, running my volcano anywhere near the 400's sounds insane, so I guess I'm just surprised that's an ideal temp for the herbe. Heck, on paper I just figured mid 300's was good, and that 400 and up would just scorch the darn thing.
Hmmm and what leads you to believe a 2.0 isn't around the corner, and rather just a slimmed down "slightly less good" edition of what's out now? I mean, I do have a volcano after all, so unless I would be getting a seriously great future proof deal via grabbing it from a friend in the 500's, I could wait, enjoying a perfectly nice vape I've had for years in the meantime (but yes, the temptation for something new that can do dabs nicely is high...no pun intended..).