I'm sorry it came out that way. My resoning is that the advantages (fast heat up, precise temp) do not back up the cost. I am not trying to flame at all, I posted late at night and english is not my native language, I was too brief which I apologise for.
My point is that take for example Arizer EQ, Da buddha or simmilar. If such gives perfectly milky clouds when you now how to pack, heat, etc, is there really room for 500$ improvement? Same goes to Volcano. I am using EQ+bong and I already have to stop myself not to cough my loungs out, why would I want more
? I am not saying that EQ is better, not at all. I live by the rule "if it aint broken dont fix it". Especially for 700$ lulz
I don't get the "haters gonna hate" attitude. It's not like I hate Buggatis because I can't afford it. I know it's value. I don't see anything revolutionary in this vape. In fact, I only see some poor advertasing (NASA, yay! USA ftw!) and very poor design. I see that it vapes well. I appriciate the technology. I just dont like anything about Herbie.
Again, sorry for accidental flaming people. This thread reminds me the Volcano one so hard ;-)
I respect this community and I hope I have cleaned my name
EDIT: I am a tiny bit curious about Herbie marketing strategy. Tell me if I get this right. They make this development reality show on social media. Then they start with a limited edition that the most hyped up users get/buy. Hmm I wonder why there are so few complaints
? Small supply + hyped fanbase = not biased reviews. BTW, how loud is the noise it makes to keep the temp in place? Like how many Db?
Vape on!