I'm trying to give the new "Cosmos" series a chance. Really I am. IMO, it's dumbed down beyond belief, unfocused, preachy, and has animation of minor characters and incidents that add nothing. What a disappointment...especially since I really like deGrasse-Tyson. Sigh...
ya neil is preachy, but thats him. its easy to listen when you agree or expecting it (its good for his "debates") but given the medium of a cosmos 2.0 its not something i was really looking for and do feel its quite the lesser if one were to compare the shows. imho when he talks it often sounds like he is insinuating constantly that he is right and to think otherwise is foolish, reminds me of richard dawkins a little bit.
also much of the information in this show is a regurgitation of what we have seen/heard on similar shows that have aired in the last 5 years so its hardly a revelation of sorts in the way carl brought forth a peaceful exploration of our universe that made you feel like everything is glorious, mysterious, ordered, chaotic, measurable, and most importantly that it exists and we are aware of it. this new show tackles different points it seems, perhaps better suited for the time in which its being aired.
when i first started college and got interested in the study of our natural world i watched an astronomy series that was hosted by what i would call a real life shaggy (from scooby do), it was a slow show packed with lots of great information that im sure i could rewatch vaped if i could ever find it, was shot in the late 60's/early 70's best i could tell and was quite a few vhs tapes for the entire series.