SAML Glass

Bologna

Bologna

(zombie) Woof.
corvo said:
those curves are very sexy :cool:
Click to expand...
Yep, I think the kiddos call that "thicc" these days....? F if i really know...:hmm::rolleyes:

Wish it had a simpler, less "smoker" and more "vaper" friendly perc like a showerhead circ or 4-hole/slit (imo, of course :tup:)...

I'm really enjoying my rather large (65mm ?) Goo Roo Hookah SOLO (with only flower) much more than I had envisioned.... def rivaling the 3-piece these days.

Edit: Or even a removable downstem (with dif perc options) would be KILLER
 
Last edited:
L

lluther

Well-Known Member
TedJones said:
Straight fab arrived! Awesome looking in person and hits just as expected. Very similar to the fc199 with the same perc, in a different form (maybe a tad more open). :luv:
https://imgur.com/a/PhZw2aX
Click to expand...
Which do you prefer out of this and the FC-199, would I be right in thinking the FC-199 might perform better (flavour, draw not being to airy) when using smaller loads, e.g. running the FC-199 with the ZX (0.05 - 01g) vs with the Full fab?
 
Last edited:
lluther,
TedJones

TedJones

Well-Known Member
lluther said:
Which do you prefer out of this and the FC-199, would I be right in thinking the FC-199 might perform better (flavour, draw not being to airy) when using smaller loads, e.g. running the FC-199 with the ZX (0.05 - 01g) vs with the Full fab?
Click to expand...
I do like the 199 just a little better. The removable mouthpiece and wide/heavy base are advantages. The MP that comes with it is a lot better than the fab’s fixed imo.
 
TedJones,
  • Like
Reactions: lluther
L

lluther

Well-Known Member
TedJones said:
I do like the 199 just a little better. The removable mouthpiece and wide/heavy base are advantages. The MP that comes with it is a lot better than the fab’s fixed imo.
Click to expand...
Thanks, this is what I suspected, and it sounds like the FC-199 is going to be a better fit for my particular use case/setup
 
lluther,
  • Like
Reactions: TedJones
SlickHenry

SlickHenry

Well-Known Member
I am torn between the FC Mod and the inline honey bubbler. Looking to use mainly with TRWW QC 18 and the Thermal Accumulator. Firstly, does anyone have a photo of both pieces side by side for form factor? It is hard to find specs as to size to compare them as well as the volume of the cans.

Ideally I am looking for something that is easy to clean and that can be stored away not taking up much space. The FC appeals as it is modular and looks a breeze to clean but the Inline honey is cheaper looks to be a bit more compact but I guess you can't change mouthpiece for a whip or change the percs. Also wondering if the mouthpiece may be a bit close to the hot heater.

Has anyone got any insights as to how they would perform for these vapes. Thanks in advance.
 
TedJones

TedJones

Well-Known Member
SlickHenry said:
I am torn between the FC Mod and the inline honey bubbler. Looking to use mainly with TRWW QC 18 and the Thermal Accumulator. Firstly, does anyone have a photo of both pieces side by side for form factor? It is hard to find specs as to size to compare them as well as the volume of the cans.

Ideally I am looking for something that is easy to clean and that can be stored away not taking up much space. The FC appeals as it is modular and looks a breeze to clean but the Inline honey is cheaper looks to be a bit more compact but I guess you can't change mouthpiece for a whip or change the percs. Also wondering if the mouthpiece may be a bit close to the hot heater.

Has anyone got any insights as to how they would perform for these vapes. Thanks in advance.
Click to expand...
HERE’S a side by side with TRWW vapes on them without adapters. You’re right, the smaller guy has a joint closer to face with a more upright mouthpiece.
 
SlickHenry

SlickHenry

Well-Known Member
TedJones said:
HERE’S a side by side with TRWW vapes on them without adapters. You’re right, the smaller guy has a joint closer to face with a more upright mouthpiece.
Click to expand...
Thanks for this. Which do you prefer using the QC18? I have a mini globe which is okay but not the most pleasant to use, so maybe also looking for something different enough and an improvement over that.
 
Last edited:
TedJones

TedJones

Well-Known Member
SlickHenry said:
Thanks for this. Which do you prefer using the QC18? I have a mini globe which is okay but not the most pleasant to use, so maybe also looking for something different enough and an improvement over that.
Click to expand...
Don’t remember using either w/the 18. Depending on what you like. The inline will have more restriction and better cooling. Need adapter to get it away from face. The mod will be wide open and warmer (9 hole). Not so sure the drop down they sell would clear the top of the rig ..
 
TedJones,
  • Like
Reactions: cannasoor
Shit Snacks

Shit Snacks

Milaana. Lana. LANA. LANAAAA! (TM2/TP80/BAK/FW9)
SlickHenry said:
Thanks for this. Which do you prefer using the QC18? I have a mini globe which is okay but not the most pleasant to use, so maybe also looking for something different enough and an improvement over that.
Click to expand...

Globe is not good for a variety of reasons, either of these will be much better! In every way imo honestly I don't think you can go wrong with either one you just need to decide which one is more appealing to you... Size shape, all one piece, etc...

TedJones said:
Not so sure the drop down they sell would clear the top of the rig
Click to expand...

And as I said before yeah drop down adapter is a must to use with either of these for me, inline honeycomb was my first so I did use it a lot without dropdown originally and it helped me learn how to hit a lot of vapes, especially pure convection, well enough, it works with everything... However FC mod with the nine hole open bottom diffusion downstem is also extremely versatile with everything and a great balance, a little more visual for the milking of the piece, yeah more versatile with the modularity for the mouthpiece and orientation... Both will be quick and easy to clean though

Look up s-shape drop down adapters, I've shared links to get on DHgate good ones that will fit either of these pieces well, you can also get them from vgoodiez eBay Amazon and other sources
 
L

lluther

Well-Known Member
I've got the FC-MOD and was wondering if any one had any idea to increase the draw resistance? I've tried using a 14mm drop down so far. I think a different downstem would do the trick, if so which one (the 3 hole?) or any other options?
 
Shit Snacks

Shit Snacks

Milaana. Lana. LANA. LANAAAA! (TM2/TP80/BAK/FW9)
lluther said:
I've got the FC-MOD and was wondering if any one had any idea to increase the draw resistance? I've tried using a 14mm drop down so far. I think a different downstem would do the trick, if so which one (the 3 hole?) or any other options?
Click to expand...

You have the main diffusion downstem? Yeah the three-hole would offer more resistance and chug, you could also try different mouthpieces, packing your bowls tighter with a finer grind, and more water
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom