So in Canada I'm a med marijuana patient, which means each month I order my monthly limit of 5g/day equiv, and it gets delivered and all is well. But if I grow a plant and get caught I could go to jail. Where they will have to provide me internet access to order my 5g/day, as well as the ways and means by which to consume said meds in a safe environment.
Is it just me or are all politicians everywhere totally corrupt and delusional? And if this is true does it then make every single civil servant that works at the behest of said politicians guilty of general asshattery?
The reason I ask is we've recently seen a German language film called 'Labyrinth of Lies', about the war crimes trials of '63, but from their start in '58. I don't usually go to these types of films, but we are members of a local film club and this was January's contribution. It was quite simply a great movie, and highly recommended for fans of intelligent film. And a couple of days later we trip over a National Geographic documentary about the Waffen SS, which was the point of the afore-mentioned movie. There is also a family connection, in that a close relation's maternal grandfather was an SS officer, who went out to work suddenly one evening in Berlin and was never heard from again. The family has lost anyone who knew anything about this, so it's been floating around as an unanswered question for a great many years.
The biggest thing I learnt was that the SS had 2 branches, one as prison guards and one as the countries police force. What they did in Germany during the war was nothing short of crimes against humanity, and this is never at question. The interesting point is that the average German, civilian or non-SS military, had no idea what was being done to people at the bequest of their government. All this due to the fact that the SS was selected to be the creme of the creme, and didn't answer to anyone outside of their own direct chain of command.
The reason all this is winding up in a 'random thoughts' thread is that I just read an article where the new Canadian Prime Minister has agreed that their pro-legalization standpoint may take some time to bring about due to a number of 'international treaties' that previous governments had signed. Why on earth would any country agree to a binding agreement of any type that goes against the will of it's citizens? And if these treaties and negotiations aren't being done in an open and transparent way that is available to all, then it's not being done on behalf of the country at all, and is likely invalid as soon as it's signed.
Are any of these linked? Or are they a bunch of random thoughts? Should I add a *bump* to the end of this post? Does this sound like the end of an old Batman episode?