War, what is it good for? Absolutely nothin' !Isn't war a loss of reason, a loss of civilization ? What do you think ?
War, what is it good for?
According to Jerry SeinfeldI believe that was the original title Tolstoy used for "War and Peace".
Thank you for this reference which I have never read.the original title Tolstoy used for "War and Peace".
Thank you for this reference which I have never read.
I'm interested in Wikipedia's analysis: in his book 'War and Peace', Tolstoy explains that 'the true explanations of war are inaccessible to human understanding; they are the result of an incalculable number of causes'.
'Leo Tolstoy develops a fatalistic theory of history, in which free will is of minor importance and all events obey an inescapable historical determinism.'
Wow, this deterministic vision sounds pessimistic, I can't help but share it
I also like the exchanges between Einstein and Freud before the Second World War, when they saw world war approaching and wondered how to avoid it.
Why war? A letter from Albert Einstein to Sigmund Freud
en.unesco.org
Why war? A letter from Freud to Einstein
en.unesco.org
My hope is that goals common to mankind, such as the fight against global warming, 'oilocene', hunger, for education, for human development, law, science, research and economic progress, will unite us and prevent us from killing each other, as has so often happened in the difficult moments of our history.
Yes I don't know and understand spoken English so badly that I won't understand more despite your efforts haha. thank you for pointing me to the reference.
American television.Yes I don't know and understand spoken English so badly that I won't understand more despite your efforts haha. thank you for pointing me to the reference.
I want to know who took that last photo, and more importantly, what the hell were they standing on?
Based on the lack of wind, and the still rotor, I’d say the guy who took the photo was standing on the tarmac.I want to know who took that last photo, and more importantly, what the hell were they standing on?
Maybe spot on for some folks.I think this belongs here:
Use cannabis and enjoy the high or don't use it and enjoy your life. Not using and desiring it or using and worrying about it is pointless (and a risk to mental health).
I didn't read it like that, I read it like this....: there's "Life" and "High Life", both paths can be enjoyed...Being influenced by cannabis and enjoying life are not mutually exclusive.
I think this belongs here:
Use cannabis and enjoy the high or don't use it and enjoy your life. Not using and desiring it or using and worrying about it is pointless (and a risk to mental health).
Maybe spot on for some folks.
But my life is not binary, my choices and variety of experience cover more than these options.
Being influenced by cannabis and enjoying life are not mutually exclusive.
I didn't read it like that, I read it like this....: there's "Life" and "High Life", both paths can be enjoyed...
If this is the interpretation, then I agree with your take on it.I didn't read it like that, I read it like this....: there's "Life" and "High Life", both paths can be enjoyed...
Just because you're high doesn't mean you're not enjoying your life. And using or not using must be binary. Is it possible to partially use? But that doesn't mean that the choice is only to use or not to use.