coolbreeze
Well-Known Member
...smoked a flower.We should thank that some people think different, imagine the first time someone
...smoked a flower.We should thank that some people think different, imagine the first time someone
We should thank that some people think different, imagine the first time someone suggested hey this guy is going to die unless "we saw his leg"...
I'm sure 99% of that room was "anti saw" the first time anyone suggested that... let alone the guy with the gangrened leg.
There's oversight. It's been effective in the past and hopefully will be as needed. I think the facts will prove so persistent that no skulduggery will be able prevent the inescapable.I understand the concept of putting judges on a wheel to try and make sure that they are chosen randomly for any given case. However, am I the only one who believes that cases that reach a certain level of national import should not be administered by brand new, totally Inexperienced or minimally experienced judges? Maybe have two wheels of judges based on some criteria of case significance. But to put an inexperienced judge as the administrator for a case of such crucial importance to our very democracy seems a fool's errand.
Sounds like college in the 70s...Some natives jumped over fires while throwing flowers that smoked over the coals and made them happy, and then they feasted and finally went to sleep out for hours.. from a book on the history of pipes, almost every culture had it in some way.
I mean back in the day, that was basically the same response. Heck, even doctors were upset when folks suggested they wash their hands, scalpels and saws after autopsies because they felt it implied that they were dirty. (https://www.history.com/news/hand-washing-disease-infection)
Also during the Spanish flu pandemic in 1918 we had the same subcurrent of anti mask and vaccine sentiment (I personally like this article for all the pictures): https://www.history.com/news/1918-spanish-flu-mask-wearing-resistance
No matter the era, there’s always going to be a subsection of the population that prefers to be belligerently contrarian. The theories change, but the conspiracy theorists remain.
I'm afraid Europe only discovered potatoes less than 500 years ago... but I'm pretty sure you already knew it.But European potato farmers 1200 years ago who were afraid of witches and trolls didn't have a TikTok.
maybe it's not even schizo shit. Maybe modern humans just still have the exact same brains as medieval peasants. But European potato farmers 1200 years ago who were afraid of witches and trolls didn't have a TikTok.
I'm afraid Europe only discovered potatoes less than 500 years ago... but I'm pretty sure you already knew it.
That's exactly it. 1200 years isn't even a drop in the bucket of evolutionary time. We have basically the same brains as someone 1200 years ago. We're the same humans. No smarter, no dumber.
They harvested mostly onions and wheat.I didn’t know what medieval peasants were harvesting. Took a guess. But in my defense I just took on a lot of psychic damage from watching a 30 minute video on TikTok conspiracy theories
You’re right. Probably the same brain as cave men too.
But it is a little disheartening because medieval peasants lived before the printing press was invented. So I gotta cut them more slack than people with access to the totality of human knowledge in their pockets who still believe in ice giants and Kim Kardashian clones.
I'd love to think those waves had crested, but no, I think they're still building. I fear a tsunami in the near future...However, we will always have waves of anti-intellectual/anti-education movements. I just hope that those waves get smaller and smaller as time goes on.
I'd love to think those waves had crested, but no, I think they're still building. I fear a tsunami in the near future...
I think the real issue we will have in the not too distant future is massive relocation of people toward the poles, beginning with a stampede from the equatorial regions starting soon. If this doesn't get the reactionaries riled nothing will. Combined with skyrocketing food prices and other stressors, they will have a field day. We really need to guard democracy with our lives and make our kids ready.I wonder how much of this comes down to the effects of mass communication technologies on society. The popularization of the printing press comes to mind.
After the printing press came the First Poster, Martin Luther. The first posting flame-wars between Protestants and Catholics eventually gave way to the 30 Years War. 20% of Europe died. It also saw the old feudal order give way to capitalism.
I think we're living through a similar upheaval now.
I have absolutely no doubt that social media is a huge contributor to all of this hostility and violence that is expressed today against one another. And if you want to drill down even further, it's the anonymity of the social media. People don't do this sort of thing in person the same way they do when they can hide behind an avatar. It's not exclusively the anonymity as you can see in recent school board meetings, but it is mostly because of the anonymity and that has spilled over into those meetings as people have become used communicating in uglier ways.I wonder how much of this comes down to the effects of mass communication technologies on society. The popularization of the printing press comes to mind.
Now they are a huge portion of european cuisine, if you add corn for example, you cover 90% of the diet of the italians.
If this doesn't get the reactionaries riled nothing will.
I think we could reduce a lot of it by requiring the social media companies to identify us and make us post under our own real names.
I understand your point of view.I have absolutely no doubt that social media is a huge contributor to all of this hostility and violence that is expressed today against one another. And if you want to drill down even further, it's the anonymity of the social media. People don't do this sort of thing in person the same way they do when they can hide behind an avatar. It's not exclusively the anonymity as you can see in recent school board meetings, but it is mostly because of the anonymity and that has spilled over into those meetings as people have become used communicating in uglier ways.
I think we could reduce a lot of it by requiring the social media companies to identify us and make us post under our own real names. But I suspect that is not something the community would go along with changing.
I just saw that the USG will significantly fund a couple massive carbon capture plants in I think TX and LA, maybe? And recent developments in fusion are beginning to show promise but this is more than a tech problem and we will have baked-in consequences we must deal with and all of them will add stress. But humans are adaptable and nothing focuses your attention like saving your children. Voting is job one.Maybe we cannot get some people to fully agree to accept that the globe is warming, given we are using recorded human history and it's too low of a sample, but we can surely do like when the ozone hole was an issue...
Get everyone to agree that warm climates are bad and we as a whole prefer a cooler climate, thus trying to kick a "human engineered global cooling era" where we would set goals as "every home should be fully solar paneled", "cities are huge concrete blocks that irradiate heat and we must cover them with trees and fountains to lower average temps", and stuff where we know we can take action and measure, like not using more CFC in our spray cans and then actually looking at the ozone layer heal.