Talking about sciencing, I've measured temps, mostly to be sure on how long it takes from a cold start to be ready and I'm curious to compare numbers with someone using a better pid + coil as I have a SZ Crossing setup with the Zx. As it has less coils, I think it is slower to heat up but once the zx is fully loaded with heat, it probably behave the same. Other difference is probably the temperature delta between displayed and measured as on cheaper pid, probe is probably less precise.
At 500F on the PID (can't even change it to a real temp scale
), after around 5 minutes of heating, if I blow through my glass piece with the zx on it (obviously without water), with a contact thermometer on the upper screen, I measure 420F, about the same average temp I measure on the coil itself (temp readings on the coil are between 360 and 480 with a small hot spot at 500, probably where the sensor is located.
On a 20s blow, the temp first peaks to 420 then from 10s to 20s drops from there to 380.
I'm curious if people with longer coils or other PIDs have less difference between displayed and measured
I suppose that as sic stores and diffuse more heat, your temperature readings would stay more steady for longer, needing lower temp on pid
I would be tempted to test, if only the zx wasn't already so great (and sic pearls so expensive
)