Phaang said:
One thing about stealth AofZ: there is no provision to hold the weed in the screen while traveling, moving about, etc. So, part of the vaping process is actually loading the screen, which, due to it's small size and delicacy, you need to pay some attention to. You'll have to pinch your load, slide the sleeve, drop the load onto the screen, move it around a bit with your finger or poking device to settle it into the screen, then close the sleeve and get ready to rotate the battery into place. Tough to do all that without someone wondering what you were doing with your busy hands all hunched over your lap! LOL. Nice idea with the hose up the sleeve, though!
Hi,
In regards to the questions about stealth, I can offer some observations. When our team first began designing vaporizers, our primary objective was to attain the highest overall absolute efficiency in a portable vaporizer -- how to get the best yield from the load -- the most from the least. And we succeeded too -- lab testing of our 1st product offering (NOT the Launch Tube) was demonstratively the most efficient portable vaporizer in the world. Naturally, it also had
excellent taste!
However, despite our technical success, our alpha-test users quickly pointed out that while the efficiency was great, 'ease of use' and 'reasonable cost' were more important than efficiency. Our first device was both very expensive and rather complex to operate (the details are too involved to go into here). As such, the engineering team went back to the drawing board -- to try to create something that was portable, less expensive and easier to use. Many product revisions later, the Launch Tube was arrived at as an
acceptable compromise -- it is much faster, costs less, and is
somewhat easier to use -- yet it also is somewhat less efficient.
Although we have succeeded in producing the
fastest possible vaporizer, the Launch Tube is
not the absolute most efficient vaporizer in the world (at least with respect to our lab standards). One disadvantage of being ultra-fast is that the Launch Tube is also (probably) not quite as good tasting as some of the
non-portable units that are available -- particularly after the second hit on a single load (to some extent, this depends on the skill of the user).
The Launch Tube is a bit like a really expensive sports car -- fast and fantastic performance when out in the country on windy twisty roads -- and yet not nearly so much fun when in your hometown driving in heavy traffic. Also, a fast sports car is great when driving on paved roads -- and not so good when on dirt roads or when bushwhacking out in the wild (although the Launch Tube is wind proof, it is not rain proof). Similarly, a fast car is not so good for heavy-lifting utilitarian purposes -- for that we would naturally recommend a vehicle more like a big truck (the Volcano vaporizer comes to mind). It is also somewhat of a given that a fast car is generally
NOT stealthy! In fact, auto makers usually go for the opposite -- to have high performance cars be as obvious and to "show off" as much as possible. People who are buying this sort of vehicle usually are informed as to what they are getting into.
We are aware that the Launch Tube is not the most stealthy device -- we were not trying for that. Nor did we go to any special extent to make it especially artful or expensive like a fast car (although we could have -- it was against our philosophy). As such, we know that the Launch Tube has some disadvantages -- this is to be expected.
Question: How important is stealth? Would you be willing to buy a product that was a lot stealthier and nearly as fast, yet was somewhat less efficient than even the Launch Tube? Would you be willing to accept that for nearly perfect stealth and perfect speed that the taste of the vapor might not be nearly as good as a vape you could plug in at home or wait five minutes for?
The advanced development team at Magic-Flight would be very interested to know.
-- Magic-Flight.com