ShadowLink12
Activist
I don't want to add more flames to the fire, but I want to step up to defend this vape.
Maybe I am just a lucky one as far as how mine was constructed or the quality of my parts, but this has been my primary vape for a few months now, mainly using the water pipe adapter. Yes, there are problems that people have discussed, and yes, my angled water pipe adapter I ordered for my stemless bubbler has the screen problem and I have been a victim of dumping herb, but I still support the concept. (I ended up taking a thicker EQ screen cutting it down to size slightly and working it until it stays in place) The water pipe adapter certainly has a learning curve, but after a few times, even my inexperienced friends can pretty much figure it out, they just don't quite rip as big of vape clouds as I can with it. You have to really nail the speed in which you hit it to really milk it, this is a negative, which will be much more apparent once the VXC hits the market which you can rip as hard and fast as you want. For me, the water pipe adapter does take some time and effort, but when you get those tasty rips free of tubing it is more than worth it. I do agree, that it would make sense to shorten it and make the screen situation 100% reliable, but I want to address those with efficiency concerns. As I have previously mentioned in another post, when I load a PD stem worth into the water pipe adapter it pretty much just covers the screen, and I find that I get the richest most consistent vapor with this amount, and it ends up the most evenly cooked. (A full description of this experience can be found on pg 18)
Will I still be using the LSV with water pipes once I have a VXC? Probably not, but I will still keep it around for quick easy rich dry vapor hits from the wand. But in the meantime I will still be ripping my LSV, and for a quick reminder of what this thing can do...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQTvqDIVVzs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_ZrFDek8D0
Maybe I am just a lucky one as far as how mine was constructed or the quality of my parts, but this has been my primary vape for a few months now, mainly using the water pipe adapter. Yes, there are problems that people have discussed, and yes, my angled water pipe adapter I ordered for my stemless bubbler has the screen problem and I have been a victim of dumping herb, but I still support the concept. (I ended up taking a thicker EQ screen cutting it down to size slightly and working it until it stays in place) The water pipe adapter certainly has a learning curve, but after a few times, even my inexperienced friends can pretty much figure it out, they just don't quite rip as big of vape clouds as I can with it. You have to really nail the speed in which you hit it to really milk it, this is a negative, which will be much more apparent once the VXC hits the market which you can rip as hard and fast as you want. For me, the water pipe adapter does take some time and effort, but when you get those tasty rips free of tubing it is more than worth it. I do agree, that it would make sense to shorten it and make the screen situation 100% reliable, but I want to address those with efficiency concerns. As I have previously mentioned in another post, when I load a PD stem worth into the water pipe adapter it pretty much just covers the screen, and I find that I get the richest most consistent vapor with this amount, and it ends up the most evenly cooked. (A full description of this experience can be found on pg 18)
Will I still be using the LSV with water pipes once I have a VXC? Probably not, but I will still keep it around for quick easy rich dry vapor hits from the wand. But in the meantime I will still be ripping my LSV, and for a quick reminder of what this thing can do...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQTvqDIVVzs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_ZrFDek8D0