lwien
Well-Known Member
..... fun to think about things like that but it doesn't get me anywhere.
Yeah it does. It's just that you don't realize you got there because you've always been there.
..... fun to think about things like that but it doesn't get me anywhere.
no it doesn't. logic gets input from controllable things, physical stuff, and it's output can be aplied again in the physical world.Yeah it does. It's just that you don't realize you got there because you've always been there.
All you need is a flux capacitor and 1.21 jigawatts of power.
I had no idea that Dr Who had such a world wide following. Incredible. Has it always been so, since the early days? I wonder how long before they come up with a US version?
And a Doc Brown.
I have a friend who is a big fan of dr. who, while ago I gave it a try, watched a few episodes of the first season, 2 or 3 episodes I think. not bad, but also not so great I'm hooked on it instantly
I don't mean this to be a shameless plug, I just don't know any other way around it to comment. If moderator feels it is inappropriate, I understand.And a Doc Brown.
I've reported this thread because this topic was already dealt with next month.
My future self tried to warn you not to do that, but, well, um, you'll see....My future self just showed up and told me I'm way too high to understand this thread. He suggested I read another thread. Or vape more and see if that helps.
With his theory worked out, Mallett was ready to build the machine and joined forces with Dr. Chandra Roychoudhuri, an experimental physicist at UConn who specializes in lasers. By constructing a circulating beam of laser light, Mallett said in an interview at the University of Pennsylvania, he and Roychoudhuri have shown that they can twist space and time into a loop, which should allow his test subjects — subatomic particles — to travel back into the past.
When most people think of time travel, they think of people getting into big, complicated machines and zipping through time. Mallett’s vision for the future is a bit more conservative. He sees us sending information, not people, through time. A practical application, he said, could be some kind of early warning system for natural disasters.