Vitolo said:
This is an EXACT duplicate situation of what happened to Coca Cola some years back. They took Coke off the shelves, and introduced "improved Coke".. and lost millions of dollars. They were fast to bring back "Coke Classic"
I don't think it's the same situation. Coke screwed up with their 'new coke'. People clearly liked the original better. Bringing the original back as Coke Classic was them trying to fix a boo boo. O&B, according to my info, planned all all along to come out with at least one more model, thus the wispr. The 'iolite Classic' (if it happens) is their attempt to 'lose' the cheap lookalikes.
the implication I got from the public relations info on the Wispr was that it was here to replace the iolite.
The info I got from a dealer (who is clearly 'in touch' with O&B) was that the wispr is not meant to replace the iolite, but marketed to please those wanted more than the iolite could deliver (thicker hits, fuel gauge, unbreakable mouthpiece, etc.). They upgraded the iolite as far as they could without changing the housing, which were improvements to the bottom of the bowl- no screen or removeable heating pin- and the filling chamber/mouthpiece area. According to the 'plan' I heard (which could have changed since then for all I know), the next step would be to stop production of the iolite for a while and reintroduce later as the 'iolite Classic', with a different look. This would be an effort to fight the cheap iolite clones. Changing the appearance of the iolite housing (dot pattern replacing the bubble pattern) could be a stop gap measure, or it's possible that they decided to do that instead of stopping production and coming out later with the 'Classic'.
My conversations in the past, with one of the company owners, kind of confirms my opinion that the wispr is not an iolite replacement. He said they fully intended to come out with more models, in addition to the iolite. They had no plan to upgrade/update the iolite any further than the bowl/mouthpiece area, since anything more than that would mean changing the housing. And as far as production costs, that kind of change isn't a wise one as long as you have a product that works and sells. Having different models, at different price points, is standard marketing strategy, and IMO that's what's going on here. What they're going to do (or not) in the future, as far as trying to separate the iolite from the lookalike clones, remains to be seen.
Donkey said:
I think they changed the bowl in the newer iolite.
They made several changes, as I noted above, to the bowl and mouthpiece. The changes were made at different times (bottom screen and pin first, then the mouthpiece mods) and since the changes didn't affect the basic performance of the vape (more like tweaks), they didn't use any version numbers to differentiate them. I've got an original iolite (one of the first to be shipped from Ireland), and one with the latest updates. During use, I can't tell which one I'm using.