Old School
Vape13man
Sorry no it does get confusing after awhile....my replacement had the lower temp but was limited by the higher temp.....the latest version has the higher temp now bumped out to 250 which I think even exceeds what the Q2 was capable of.....Are you using the newest version? Are the reports of wispy hits untrue? Are you having a different experience?
Yes I in fact feel it should be higher and was in fact higher with my Q2......see if this helps....I'm confident that my new replacement Q3 will be like my old replacement with the added fact that I can now kill my cap on my 3rd run like I like too.....{I really missed that ability} however......I'm also expecting based on Sonics comments that I will not be getting my Q2 rich thick velvety smooth draws like I used to....w/Q2I don't really care what the dial # says, just what temp it translates to. Inh has said 125-250 on an 8 digit dial w/ even distribution. That means +18 degrees per bump. at 6, that would be 214C (that is over 417F).
If this is the 1st place you get noticeable vapor (more than wispy) I don't consider that effective or on par w/ comparable products. Do you not feel that the vapor to air ratio should be higher at a lower temp?
However I want to say again to be clear....my replacement was still better IMO than what is out on the market today.....even without the higher temp ability to kill a cap....I really enjoyed the 3rd run as its when you get smacked bt the CBN "couch lock" it has a place......I prefer night time just before bed...