OF
Well-Known Member
Gentle Friends,
I've had my FIERCE for half a day now, long enough to charge it up, do a few burn offs and try a session with the bent stem. Something I'll have to revisit.
But then I did what I think a logical test I don't think anyone has: An A/B test against Fury 2? I loaded both with the same herb, using the normal MPs, set both to to 390F and powered both up together. And sat with F2 in my right hand, the new one in my left (not that it matters which, of course).
F2 'made temperature' faster. 35 vs 45 seconds (FIERCE's clock, counting up, is handy here). This is an indicated temperature of the heater, not load of course. To me this indicates more power is being used heat the larger bowl, but not enough to completely offset the difference? F2 battery only half charged, it should be a bigger difference with equal charges you'd think? Anyway, fairly good vapor from F2 at one minute, FIERCE was still very thin. Which makes sense to me since the larger load has less surface area per unit of volume and longer heatpaths to the center of the load to slow things up.
At two minutes, F2 was rolling right along, FIERCE was catching up, but still behind. By 3 minutes it was basically a push, although FIERCE had less restriction for those who are big fans of hard hits (I'm a sipper, personally). This held to four minutes and shutdowns. No doubt the bigger vape has more life in it's ABV of course, but I'd have to say that in a flat out race to vapor F2 leaves the new guy in the dust.
I'm going to repeat a time or two, perhaps others who have both can try it and report? Either to confirm or tell the world just how full I am and what exactly it is I'm full of? TIA.
The two are definitely different beasts, although FIERCE does fit in my pants pocket (if it's empty) F2 is definitely easier to tote around. Not only smaller, but much lighter. Depending on your POV the new display is less useful IMO. It has more information displayed but the font is smaller? I don't really need to know 'full time' what the setting is for temperature and time limit for instance. I'd prefer bigger displays of the information I do need for better use without my glasses. The vibrate on turn on and especially turn off is nice (I often get caught sucking on a cooling F2), but some might like to be able to turn that off for stealth?
Very solid construction, as others have said. A real 'handful' for sure, makes F2 feel like a toy? Much bigger and heavier. I'm not big on USB-C, although it charges faster than the mini used on F2, it's an 'oddball' around here. I had to swap cables around so I could charge from my usual rig which monitors charge rate and total charge transferred. That may/will change over time.
I'm not sure I like the new retention system for the MP. It has a habit of sticking to the cover as it's pulled up and off, not a really useful feature IMO.
Anyway, it's not just a bigger F2. I see it as a different device, with different strengths and weaknesses? Both have their place, with only some overlap in features/function. FWIW I think this guy will better serve groups while F2 will continue to be the call for MMJ, travel outside the house, quick 'top up' hits and such. When it comes time to put it on a WT F2 should move over and let FIERCE pass. I'm not sure what I'd answer 'which would you take if you could only have one?'. It's not only too early to tell, but fortunately I don't face that hard choice.
@Vitolo, you have both, right? Am I correct in guessing F2 would work better for your customers?
Great product, IMO, at least thus far. And while it should be judged on it's own merits it seems natural to compare to F2.
Weekend regards to all.
OF
I've had my FIERCE for half a day now, long enough to charge it up, do a few burn offs and try a session with the bent stem. Something I'll have to revisit.
But then I did what I think a logical test I don't think anyone has: An A/B test against Fury 2? I loaded both with the same herb, using the normal MPs, set both to to 390F and powered both up together. And sat with F2 in my right hand, the new one in my left (not that it matters which, of course).
F2 'made temperature' faster. 35 vs 45 seconds (FIERCE's clock, counting up, is handy here). This is an indicated temperature of the heater, not load of course. To me this indicates more power is being used heat the larger bowl, but not enough to completely offset the difference? F2 battery only half charged, it should be a bigger difference with equal charges you'd think? Anyway, fairly good vapor from F2 at one minute, FIERCE was still very thin. Which makes sense to me since the larger load has less surface area per unit of volume and longer heatpaths to the center of the load to slow things up.
At two minutes, F2 was rolling right along, FIERCE was catching up, but still behind. By 3 minutes it was basically a push, although FIERCE had less restriction for those who are big fans of hard hits (I'm a sipper, personally). This held to four minutes and shutdowns. No doubt the bigger vape has more life in it's ABV of course, but I'd have to say that in a flat out race to vapor F2 leaves the new guy in the dust.
I'm going to repeat a time or two, perhaps others who have both can try it and report? Either to confirm or tell the world just how full I am and what exactly it is I'm full of? TIA.
The two are definitely different beasts, although FIERCE does fit in my pants pocket (if it's empty) F2 is definitely easier to tote around. Not only smaller, but much lighter. Depending on your POV the new display is less useful IMO. It has more information displayed but the font is smaller? I don't really need to know 'full time' what the setting is for temperature and time limit for instance. I'd prefer bigger displays of the information I do need for better use without my glasses. The vibrate on turn on and especially turn off is nice (I often get caught sucking on a cooling F2), but some might like to be able to turn that off for stealth?
Very solid construction, as others have said. A real 'handful' for sure, makes F2 feel like a toy? Much bigger and heavier. I'm not big on USB-C, although it charges faster than the mini used on F2, it's an 'oddball' around here. I had to swap cables around so I could charge from my usual rig which monitors charge rate and total charge transferred. That may/will change over time.
I'm not sure I like the new retention system for the MP. It has a habit of sticking to the cover as it's pulled up and off, not a really useful feature IMO.
Anyway, it's not just a bigger F2. I see it as a different device, with different strengths and weaknesses? Both have their place, with only some overlap in features/function. FWIW I think this guy will better serve groups while F2 will continue to be the call for MMJ, travel outside the house, quick 'top up' hits and such. When it comes time to put it on a WT F2 should move over and let FIERCE pass. I'm not sure what I'd answer 'which would you take if you could only have one?'. It's not only too early to tell, but fortunately I don't face that hard choice.
@Vitolo, you have both, right? Am I correct in guessing F2 would work better for your customers?
Great product, IMO, at least thus far. And while it should be judged on it's own merits it seems natural to compare to F2.
Weekend regards to all.
OF