Vape Donkey 650
All vape, no smoke please.
The Puffco Plus does allow you to access and clean every part without disassembly. Since the heater is below a dish its as simple as swab the dish just like an enail.
Can you access the entire air flow path and remove the heater with it's wire leads from their contact points on the atomizer base, and also clean underneath the cup? It's possible for oil and reclaim to leak into the atty from the side air flow holes, I think(like any dab atty) so if you can't access that stuff underneath, that can lead to a marginally fouled air intake. This could happen on the DT 2.5 and others. It's a rather marginal point, IMO, but some people want a 100% cleanable atty, not just a cleanable vaping surface.
I completely understand why @herbivore is not convinced on the DT. There are many reasons I am not sold on it like the simple reason that exposed donut tech is flawed IMO because you cannot clean it without disassembly. Thats probably a big reason why DT is trying to get crucibles/cups for the atomizers he sells. I also would not take well to someone telling me its no big deal to take apart the atomizer for thorough cleaning as I just dont have time for that shit. I am a very busy person at home and work so I really appreciate the ease of sticking a q-tip in the Puffco Plus and spinning it around a couple times after one heat cycle to get it brand new white again!
Agreed that the crucible cup holds the best potential as a ceramic heating element that is the easiest to load and keep tidy. Not sure how they compare vs donuts on air flow and leak resistance? Donuts have been mounted in a variety of attys with different cups and air intakes and paths, some implement the design better than others. The DT... v3.5 let's call it? with a crucible cup seems like it will be made sometime this year, let's hope, so we'll see how it compares with the puffco, if and when?
I'm also a pretty busy guy too, and work, but at least we're finding time to make these posts? I disassemble a v3 donut for a full soaking and cleaning and burning...every several weeks or so...after dozens + loads. To keep it clean in the intermediate, I try to vape up my loads in entirety, not leaving partial melts and reclaim on the bottom. I pick at any oil that may stick to the side with a dab tool to put it back on the donut. And if any crust accumulates, I wipe it clean with my flat dab tool at 200F and it looks almost as white as new. Not as easy as a quick qtip swab but I mange it pretty easy. There will be trace reclaim underneath the donut in the cup, but I don't hate on vaping a little reclaim if it isn't all thick and grossed out. At that point that stuff makes less vape and is flavor-neutral, but still has alot of actives. Some people demand keeping their dab gear even much cleaner than me, most are much more slovenly.
Those of you who have posted about the DT have had very little to say about the Puffco Plus. You have even criticized or questioned the performance, yet you have not tried any such device because it is currently the only one. It shows that you guys did not look into the Puffco Plus really and do not understand its design.
I read through the whole puffco thread not that long ago...I looked at as many pics as I could easily look up. My memory may fail me, but correct me if I'm wrong about some of the drawbacks or potential problems with the puffco:
- units overheat - fixed by using box mods I think? But why even sell them with "vape pen" batteries then?
- cups can leak out if overloaded or if you don't vape up your loads to completion - nothing special there. I think any atty mentioned in this thread is prone to that, to some degree
- airflow on the puffcos looks pretty limited, that limits performance and vape cloud production. i see this as a crutch to aid heating elements that don't warm up quickly with high watts also
- you can't change the heating element or cup or access underneath the atomizer. you just throw away and replace atomizers when they wear out. convenient for some users, but others like to re-use, tweak and clean all internal parts
To really be fair, let me list the downsides of the DT v3.0. It's not perfect either. I've already listed the strengths
- wire lead holes underneath the cup are prone to a slow, slight leakeage if you overload the donut or don't vape up your loads completely. with the air holes this can happen too but I find this more avoidable there. this can be minimized with proper use but i'd like to see it eliminated, could make over-loading more feasible
- the posts on the atomizer deck for the wire leads can be improved - the contact between the post, screw and wire lead isn't always sufficient for a steady Ω reading which can cause TC to act erratically or drop into VW mode. This problem can be eliminated by stuffing a few short wire strands in the post to act as conductive buffers, but better post terminals and screws would be nicer. Other atomizers that aren't rebuildable won't have this problem, but I've found poor contact on the wire leads in many non-RBA carts to be an occasional problem, on the non-RBAs you can't fix the wire if its contact breaks. Out of 14 DT v3 atty's I'm using, the contact problem only bothers me occasionally on 3 or 4 of my donuts
- the design of the cup that holds the donut allows some oil to collect underneath, which won't always be vaped up with normal use at moderate temperatures. you can get at most of this stuff easily with a small tool, but it would be nice if this didn't happen. cups hold more potential for tidyness in this dept.
Please don't take my words as further contradiction. Instead, please understand them as another perspective.
For sure! I don't think anyone here is meaning to say their preferred device is the only way to go, and all others are crap. Some of us have different vaping needs and preferences and priorities than others. I don't think anyone posting on this thread is going to convince the other guy to switch to the competing device that they're skeptical of, but at least for the many other people lurking or reading this thread, we should at least try to get the most, best, accurate information out there, to help others make good choices right?
I understand the Puffco plus perfectly, I'm skeptical after all of the bad reviews and reports on it. It definitely does not have many supporters on FC, which is a red flag to me if the atomizer works so well, I feel like everybody would be talking about it. I love the cup idea for sure, but it would be super frustrating to go back to such a small atomizer.
I feel you on that too. Just because we're group-thinking donuts doesn't necessarily mean it's better for all, but I do tend to trust the general consensus on this forum and factor in the reviews. Maybe some of the earlier rough patches in a new product release (which are common) have been smoothed out and some of the bad reviewers weren't using the product properly (many people get confused by the DTs + TC at first too) But I just don't see tons of people here saying they love puffcos, maybe I'm just not seeing them
The biggest "red flag" to me on the puffcos is why the maker is telling people not to use it in TC mode? If they know the composition of their lead wires, and the supplier is consistent, and it is not kanthal, there should be no problem in using TC.
Possible reasons for not promoting TC might be cuz puffco's donut wires may be of varying sources? Or maybe they just want to continue pushing those little obsolete overpriced unregulated batteries that go with them? IDK?
Lucky for me, I'm fairly healthy. But the closest thing I have to a disability is being prone to asthma if i breath polluted crap like smoke, combined with my allergies. I can tolerate very little smoke before I can't breathe well, so having a vape than can possibly combust with normal use (even a little bit) is a deal-breaker for me. My airway can actually tolerate and enjoy pretty big decent vape clouds if it's pure and sufficiently cool. I've never found a vape atty that fires at a fixed wattage could satisfy my hunger for big clouds and reliably not combust at the same time.
Even a little pyrolysis in my vape makes my throat swell up too
It's really easy to see if the puffco or any atty can TC if you have the mod. If it's under 1.5Ω, just set the TCR low to start at 120 or so (SS) and maybe 350, 400F or whatever, at moderate watts at first, commensurate to the atomizer Ω. See if you get any vape. See if it drops out of TC into VW (if it doesn't thats good) Keep bumping up the TCR # in increments of 10 or 15 or so, holding the same temperature, until you start getting vape. As you notice the time duration it takes to reach protection, you may increase the watts as well. When you find a TCR # that makes the kind of vape you want at a reasonable temperature setting you want to use, then you've set up your atty for TC! If you know your wire material, you can skip all this.
Also, if you have access to an IR thermometer with adjustable emissivity, you can keep your atomizer empty and dry while you bump up the TCR #'s until it matches the readings on your thermometer.
All of this stuff has been well covered in the DT thread. I don't blame anyone for not wanting to dive in and read the 102-page tome that is that thread today, but there's tons of good stuff in there.
Sorry for another TC-nerd rant, but this kind of stuff is critical to my vape needs
Last edited: