Cappella Sistina said:
I have to wonder what kind of clueless morons write news stories anymore.
From the above story by Associated Press (gods help us!):
"Day by day, scientists in boats tally up dead birds, sea turtles and other animals, but the toll is surprisingly small given the size of the disaster. The latest figures show that 783 birds, 353 turtles and 41 mammals have died numbers that pale in comparison to what happened after the Exxon Valdez disaster in Alaska in 1989, when 250,000 birds and 2,800 otters are believed to have died."
Excuse me? I would be willing to bet that number does not encompass even the Louisiana wildlife losses. Seriously, think about it. The VAST majority of the deaths are occurring well beyond our tiny viewing area and the dead are already in pieces or at the bottom or both. What we see on the surface is less than 1% of what is out there.
Valdez my big red ass, that was a relatively small amount of oil spilled once in a relatively insulated area and limited in its effect on the rest of the state.
Here's another awesome paragraph:
"For nearly four hours Monday, a three-person crew with Greenpeace cruised past delicate islands and mangrove-dotted inlets in Barataria Bay off southern Louisiana. They saw dolphins by the dozen frolicking in the oily sheen and oil-tinged pelicans feeding their young. But they spotted no dead animals."
And obviously by this, we should infer that being covered in oil is not harmful? WTF?
What kind of fucking monkeys is AP buying "news" stories from now? Shit, one of them is writing from fucking Michigan!
Watch for the extinction reports.