Thanks Shrike, but I can read what paklolo says for themselves. Can you read what I wrote? They were tempted to remove my post, yet not the post that started this whole thing? That's what I thought was interesting "...end of story"
What I'm saying is that by pakalolo's "ruling" (for lack of a better word) the post I responded to is just as against the rules, which I have nothing against! What I am against is unequal application of those rules. The original post I responded to was just as much about race and politics yet did not spur any sort of mod action or attention. That post to begin with should have received the same threat of deletion and warning issued to not discuss further.
I am all for the deletion of this post, your post, my post responding to pakalolo, pakalolo's glib response, my original post, and the original post i responded to, as that'd be an equal and fair application of the rule against politics and race discussion and would continue to allow FC to be a drama-free "safe-space" (again for lack of a better word).