I myself would rather have a ss screen for better airflow. As it is the screen thats in there has been Rammed in,. in no uncertian fashion to the point that it is buckled (concave) and impossible to "fish out".Quality control seems a nonsense when units are going out the door in that condition, I'm not impressed.If they want to enhance thier customer base they should take heed, if not i'll buy elsewhere next time.
PS ; I dont do passthrough on anything connected to a wall.
Cool. I guess I didn't make myself clear enough. I see no 'defect' nor justification for "Quality control seems a nonsense when units are going out the door in that condition" since I think it's designed to be built like that.
Basically just like is done in Imap+. Are you suggesting they too have a "nonsense" QC policy? I don't believe it's poorly designed nor sloppily built/inspected, it's just not done the way you'd recommend?
If they get a lot of warranty returns for fouled lower screens they'll no doubt address that. Being as the design of that part is 'mature' (long history), I sure don't expect a change for the normal reasons.
Then again, I also think mindlessly 'opening up the air flow' without considering why such restrictions were designed in is not sound logic. While individual tastes might vary, the guys that design these things are generally not stupid I think. They try such things out and make decisions based on those results? Remove too much restriction and more guys will overdraw the heater and get worse (not better) production. There is a fixed amount of heat energy available in the walls of the oven, drawing cold air in robs vapor production. You get more volume but less potent concentrations of THC. This is why when you 'milk glass' with vapes you go slow generally.
Skills learned from blazing, where for instance harder draw feeds the fire and makes more heat in the load, not less like in this case, are often not useful. Best to, as CK so well and often advises, 'go with the flow' at first?
Glad to hear you don't "do passthrough on anything connected to a wall", but I'm hard pressed to think of a pass through that isn't connected to the wall (either directly or indirectly). That's sort of the definition? Unless it's in a car or RV/boat, where I consider 12 Volts DC to be 'the wall'. Obviously some work well, like the original Solo and most cell phones/laptops/tablets where the charging supply is more powerful than the demand of the unit (so the battery is never really used, only suffers a slower charging). Most vapes don't do this. A good rule of thumb might be 'is the run time shorter than recharge time?' I think. If it is avoid 'use while charging'.
OF