and their estimates are not an deliberate deception, right? karma is a bitch. all i'm saying is that people should feel free to use theirs loopholes as they used our trust in those estimates.
i'm not saying that i'm gonna actually sell Hopper and do this warranty transfer. this argument started when one guy said that warranty is not transferable. i replayed that ACCOUNT can be transferred though.
OK. peace out honest people!
i told my point, not gonna talk about this anymore.
The loophole you (now) advocate exploiting (changing the name on an account) is not referenced at all in the warranty, so I say it has nothing to do with the warranty. It is part of the tracking process for a Hopper's ownership. The warranty is an agreement between HL and the original purchaser. There is no mechanism in the contract to allow changing the participants.
You didn't agree with my analogy about robbing the gas station because, you said that would hurt someone. I feel nonetheless that it's a perfectly apt comparison, because I see that cheating HL on the warranty is in turn increasing their costs (due to deception, they have to maintain the Hopper longer than they are obliged) which will eventually hurt customers with higher prices.
You have insisted that the warranty is transferable when it is clearly not. So you changed the argument to justify cheating because, a. You apparently believe you can cheat without getting caught, and b. You claim the company cheated you and turnaround is fair play, even if illegal and unethical.
Now it's all good because those weren't your arguments? It was about account change? Would you be interested in running for president of the US? You seem appropriately qualified to be a politician.
As I said before, you seemed to be arguing just for argument's sake. I'm gonna hope that this is indeed the case, this is all just academic theoretical discussion, right? You don't have to answer that...