ELEMENT by PHASE3

Rodney

Well-Known Member
It has 300% more thermal mass than glass.



This vape is designed for most of the cooling to be achieved by mixing in ambient fresh air.

As of right now this project is on pause and I’m working on a new high surface area cooling design for all 8MM vape platforms.


I cant see it on the site, can you link it please?


it says no O rings or replacement parts this is why am interested.

oh its been paused for now? shame :(
 
Rodney,

vapormachina

Well-Known Member
that looks very nice, I made something similar some years ago

I never liked the configuration in the dynavap tip so I made this a bit less restricted and with more mass. With armored cap it works like a charm💪🏻

504-5.jpg
504-6.jpg
 

Ernielicous

Well-Known Member
I would buy a couple of these tbh! a zirconia bat for on the go is a home run! I don't even have to try it, to believe. would be cool if these got produced I've wanted one since you first brought up the concept
 

Clapped_r6

bass in your face
I'd buy one, everything else you've made has been dope
100%
Definitely. I'd love to have a non-metal stem that tastes great but is also unbreakable.
Count me in. For me personally, my TA3 is a hot sob, metal stems transferred way too much heat. Glass works good, but fragile etc. I remember talking to you about this concept a year or so ago? And it was a good idea then, and a better idea now
 

TigoleBitties

Big and Bouncy
Also the ceramic work gets really expensive when you start getting fancy, I want to keep this closer to $100 than $200 to broaden my brands accessibility
I think one iteration back when this was named the Puritan, you wanted to keep the price point at $100 but couldn't keep the ceramic built-in screen because you mentioned the price would be too high. Now I see the ceramic permanent screen is back. Did the price of such complex machining drop?
 

invertedisdead

PHASE3
Manufacturer
I think one iteration back when this was named the Puritan, you wanted to keep the price point at $100 but couldn't keep the ceramic built-in screen because you mentioned the price would be too high. Now I see the ceramic permanent screen is back. Did the price of such complex machining drop?

The difference is this design was positioned to be molded rather than machined to keep the price point lower.
Thus it would need a certain amount of interest to justify the high upfront investment.

To just machine the entire thing, the fixed screen is too complicated to do without splitting the device into two pieces (tip + stem)

Although maybe splitting into two wouldn't be that big of a deal. I dig the unibody minimalist take though.
 
Top Bottom