kernal6500
Well-Known Member
I emailed Matt about this issue or thought when the first v2 came out. The holes are intended to be that close actually. The airflow is what creates the vapor. I think Matt has done his R&D and found this set up to give off the most vapor. Try firing your donut without the cap on. Then do the same and blow on it. When blown, visible vapor emerges
I do agree with the leakage problems though. This thing isn't perfect for sure. But I think Matt has his priorities right. I would prioritize vapor production and flavor over leakage too.
The holes on the bottom although may be a leakage point, drainage holes may be better off because once the atty is clogged and gunked up internally, it may be beneficial to have a drainage point. However, this can also be achieved by removing the contact pin on the bottom for cleaning. I like the little bit of airflow those holes provide though
I disagree here.
I don't see how it would make a difference if the air holes are higher, you would still get good airflow. think of an atomizer for liquid nicotine the only air holes it has are no where close to the heating element. The airflow does not create the vapor the heating element does. The airflow allows you to inhale the vapor...
I personally hate when I get into my car after work and realize my atty leaked out a huge chunk of my expensive concentrate.
A proper atty= airflow+ no leakage which ='s a long atty life and happy customer. I still get amazing airflow even when the bottom holes (where u screw in the atty ) are clogged.