Just wanted to chime in here as an European who occasionally uses type 3 flower from the US.
I understand that it's a question of legality, but there's literally a night and day difference between US and EU hemp. The EU scene is so heavily regulated in terms of genetics, in contrast to US breeders basically only having to focus on THC levels (which opens up almost infinite crossing opportunities).
Hopefully we'll see a general legalization of <1% THC somewhere down the line, that would be very interesting (and arguably reasonable).
Just wanted to highlight this in case someone tries EU hemp and writes the whole thing off based on that one experience. There's just not enough potential in the gene pool, and everything outside of that is unfortunately considered illegal over here. CBD dominant flower can, however, be excellent when done right.
For reference, I've had hemp flower from some of the more prominent US growers that on all counts were looking, smelling and tasting just like your average "mid" type 1. And with very relaxing effects (high CBC levels often add some "punch" to the entourage effect, even with very low THC).
Lastly, I personally think it's a shame that type 2 and 3 don't get more recognition overall; they should IMO be the market standard for Cannabis since the effects are a lot more balanced and "life compatible" for most people. It's a bit like comparing beer and liquor, or having a buzz vs being high. The current lack of options and constant chase for potency probably isn't doing the legal status any favors.
Type explanation if anyone's unaware:
Type 1: THC dominant, low CBD. AKA MJ.
Type 2: Balanced THC:CBD ratio. "80s weed".
Type 3: CBD dominant, low THC. AKA hemp.
Same plant, just different chemotypes.
Banana MAC crossed with a high-CBD strain. 0.41% THC, 13.81% CBD. Full-body, couch-lock leaning effects.