It's ('the study's') prejudice (of assumed authority and final word) is apparent from the start, "can be characterized as two types..." Who the hell says so? They continue by lumping non-related cases into a single group, "arrested marihuana, or other drug law violators..." and this is not a scientific way to study anything. Crap, if you can't get past the first sentence or two, WTF ? Even Judge Judy (if she were on their side) would be on these statements like white on rice . beyond that point I have no need to go furhter, seen this type of science since before 'the war on drugs' , been there... marihuana lumped with pain pills and any other substance, well except alcohol, cause that's condoned and taxed and . . .
VVV Eww, just notices your avatar changes... COOOOOL... I'm slow... or stoned...