Maybe older WPA in there???How can you tell?
Maybe older WPA in there???How can you tell?
That too!!!The best way to tell is if the screen doesn’t flip.
Is there any rubber smell or taste with the new version?
Do you have a source for the tape in the CFV?
Old WPA and the display doesn’t invertHow can you tell?
Yeah I agree. I prefer the way it looks too. I think you even get more airflow aswell.I do think I like the glass mouthpiece more. The vapor is warmer, but I don’t think it’s anything beyond something you’d get with an Arizer. Actually get Arizer vibes from this in a couple ways.
Anyone else experiencing the swivel mouthpiece top popping off very easily whilst hot? It takes considerably more force when it has cooled off
Yeah I don't love the look of the magnet connection. I don't have mine yet tho so we'll see.YESSS
Happened in my upcoming video too.
It's not the magnetic part that's the problem in my case. The part that swivels is coming off very easily when it heats up.Yeah I don't love the look of the magnet connection. I don't have mine yet tho so we'll see.
Ohhhh, like just the mouth piece.It's not the magnetic part that's the problem in my case. The part that swivels is coming off very easily when it heats up.
From Boundless message number *1043,....' The number “201803” will be printed on the bottom of the unit’s base'.How can you tell?
VapeCritic pulled this vape out on his latest live stream and it made me turn away from the Tera big time. He was supposed to showcase the whole thing, but stopped because he was not enjoying the vapor. He said the vapor quality was similar to the CFV, had to turn the temps up really high to get any visible clouds and it had a burnt spot when he did so. In addition, when he took his final draw, he made a face that implied "this thing tastes disgusting". He did a comparison with the Haze Square and said the price of that unit and the Tera should be swapped.
I like information. Deception , not so much! Nuff said!I watch to get informed not be entertained so I will watch both of them. Both reviewers have value.