Iamloco724
New Member
I found it and purchased it with the cfx, it wasn't on the cfx page I found it on the site through a Google search
No need for a spacer on top?I've gotten some decent clouds with as low as .05 grams. With .08 grams you will definitely get good clouds. That's assuming your material is good of course.
I find lightly tamping the load gives more dense vapor, especially with smaller loads.
Nope. The Boundless vapes are very forgiving. Honestly tamping doesn't even affect vapor density that much, but there is a slight noticeable difference.No need for a spacer on top?
Nope. The Boundless vapes are very forgiving. Honestly tamping doesn't even affect vapor density that much, but there is a slight noticeable difference.
I get great results no matter how I grind or load my CFX. I've never had a disappointing session.
It's definitely not revolutionary. I have other vapes that are more cutting edge. The Boundless vapes simply do one thing, and do it well. They provide effortless vapor.I think it's gotta be the partial convection; the combo of the two. Plus a kickass battery and a really good path(s). These units do stand apart in terms of general price to performance and yeah do pretty well no matter how you load it. Heat up time is one of the best on the market too. I mean it's not revolutionary but definitely noteworthy and somewhat evolutionary.
Aristotle said:The whole is greater than the sum of its parts.
It's hard to beat a pure convection vape for pure vapor production. My Grasshopper, E-Nano, and Sticky Brick put out super dense, potent vapor.I guess your last statement is essentially what I meant. If it was more of a "leader" in more categories it would not be sub-$200, for starters.
I haven't tried enough other ones to be able to say more 'across the board' like you can. So what are some examples of the best you've tried in terms of general vapor production amount per pull? Though I know there can be a few factors in that equation.
Thanks I think I might try to buy some Crafty MPs just to see.Never tried the stock mouthpiece. Switched it out first thing cuz I couldn't stand the shape. Just a more comfortable mp for me. I believe it should improve airflow over stock.
I don't think it'll be out until this fall, obviously not sure but I'd say 2 months at the minimum. I understand wanting to wait--I have high hopes for the CFV as a real entry level and regulated convection device.Wavy vaporizers commented on namaste vapes CFX video that he would be reviewing the CFV. I hope it comes out soon. I've been holding off on a CFX.
Ask and you shall receive:Hey guys, I was trying to come up with a way of making the CF more discrete in public settings, IE, since the shape sort of looks like a box mod, go with making it look more like an ecig. Overall I feel that the mouthpiece is the biggest obstacle to this. Is there any straight mouthpiece that could be attached? I suppose the WPA could be drawn from directly, but that probably gets hot as it's plain metal. Any other thoughts?
I've tried this and it does indeed work very well.This is the mouthpiece i use now, it started when i was using my water tool then i popped a reducer on there and it turned out to be a great mouth peice.
Its just the cfx WPA with a reducer to 14mm i like that it looks kinda like a box mod. Keeps things cool even for the short length no burning lips.
Speaking of convection, I have it on good authority that a video announcement is coming tomorrow regarding the features of the CFV, Boundless' first full convection model. Very excited!
From what I've heard, the user will have their choice of stainless steel, Quartz or wood for a ring that acts as a heat sink for the herb chamber.
Do I know what that means? Not really. Am I very fucking excited? Yes, certainly.
Awesome, thats exactly what I was looking for. Makes the unit a little less pocket-able but perfect for a concert or festival where e-cigs are allowed and in common useAsk and you shall receive:
I've tried this and it does indeed work very well.