Please stay on topic: pyrolysis
Well, an interesting alternative take on vaping for sure.
Sadly, you're making some major league claims that you've not explained, or provided any references that you've used as resources to your thoughts (e.g. how do you know all the definitive claims you're basing this on?).
Some of the comments are not very scientific - e.g. "It takes a tremendous amount of energy to transform a liquid into a gas, and heated air is a poor means of transferring heat to the essential oil in the dried herb."
This doesn't really say anything about what's going on. You're talking about heat of vapourisation, but not describing it correctly, just saying something is enormous says little with nothing to compare against or quantify, and all vapes have to achieve this. It's not helping to understand what you're trying to say. And why is heated air a poor means of transferring heat (i.e. convection)? And with respect to what?
Also, how have you determined the amounts of terpenoids being extracted from the weed in normal vapes at a range of temps vs. your device, so as to provide empirical comparisons to show the advantages and quantify them? In addition, how are you measuring the output to compare between a normal vape and your device? I would imagine you'd need to be passing the vapour through a gas chromatograph to see the components and quantities. How can you tell whether only pyrolysis is taking place and no oxidation is occurring (see previous comment - chromatograph and/or spectrometry analysis probably required).
You ideas sound interesting, but the descriptions given are not convincing (which doesn't mean your thoughts don't have value, just that I can't assess that value without real data on how all your conclusions have been discovered and how accurate they may or may not be).
I could go through your OP bit by bit on specific parts but I don't think that would be especially engaging to read or helpful, frankly, and would just produce reams of boring text, so I just threw in some examples of why I find the post hard to be more enthusiastic about without more info on sources of information and how you've come to your conclusions. Just saying something without that appears to be an opinion more than anything.
