Recent content by mulciber

I have a very newbie-sounding question. I've been using the TM/TM2 for years, and always with the short glass stem. I've never really had an issue with cooling. I handle it other ways and enjoy the vapor completely. I just broke one of my stems and was about to replace it. I can see that the...

I'm afraid I never gave much thought to battery life. I'm seeing my 18650s drain instantly in light use. I've seen that there are ways to preserve the power as long as possible, but I'm wondering how many recharges are the average for these before they meet their demise. I've also seen some...

I had one I wasn't using and sold it through FC. Have a look in the chats and so on to see if anyone's looking for one. For those who love them they're quite valuable.

They may not answer promptly, but in my experience they're happy to answer questions if they can. The switch broke on my TM2 about 1.5 months after it arrived. There appears to have been some bad switches, and that may be all this is. They sent a mailing label and had a repaired unit back to...

This person is asking about point #4 of the appendix on the back page of the instruction manual. It allows the user to go beyond the set temperature range. I've never done it, so I can't advise. However, I'm curious as to why one would want to.

I am not a physicist, but I honestly can't see how it would be possible for "aluminum dust" to gather on the o-ring. In fact it just doesn't make sense to me that the device would be generating "aluminum dust" in anything like normal handling. No offense, not disputing, it just doesn't seem to...

There is not, especially since they are designated "Food grade silicone" on the Tinymight website. I regard some of the flags raised here warily. Not an expert on these matters, but the maker of the TM seems to have begun with an eye to safety concerns, and made improvements for the second...

It's true that I saw at least one tear-down, but it was insufficient to determine the security of the path. I'll follow your reference. Thank you!

I tend to believe the maker absent any information to the contrary. I searched for a proper tear-down or X-ray cross-section of the OG TM (what I have) and haven't found one. I suppose there's been no one willing to take a band saw to their device. I'd very much welcome being pointed to...

As a matter of fact, I do. I have two original Legacy's. One was a bit spotty so rather than repair it, I got another. then I purchased the Pro. They work differently, and sometimes the OG Legacy is just what I want. It hits more lightly, and is, perhaps, better for "microdosing" than the Pro...

Up to you, but I can assure you that there's _plenty_ to like about this unit. I am very glad I have it, as I was with the OG, despite any shortcomings. It does more things v. well than most comparable devices, imo.

I've played around with these variables too, and you may be right. It's a fairly subtle difference. I think a bit too much may be made of the conduction angle. I do think the redesign may put a little more weight on the heat retained by the chamber, but I don't think you've got a real conduction...

You've got it right, it's useless. I posted about this before — it's just a fail. I suspect they'll figure it out and issue a fix, but they'll probably charge for it. The "theory" was that as you turn it anticlockwise the cap would extend downward and make the chamber smaller and compact it. But...

I want to give you a bit more detail. First, the mouthpiece is ceramic, and it's one of my favorite things about the unit. Feels right, pulls right, easy to clean, more or less unbreakable. The path on the pro works like this: hot air through the material in the bowl, vapor rises and goes...

It really sounds like the Legacy Pro checks a lot of boxes for you. Good luck!