Every time I watch a video review the reviewers seem to have a thing about exhaling a cloud of unabsorbed vapor.
To me this makes no sense. You payed for that herb, you want it to be as effective as possible.
Hold that hit in and let it absorb.
Also taking hits so massive they exhale a huge cloud of waisted vapor then proceed to harsh out and start coughing. What is this... amateur hour? Stop abusing yourself.
Then, when they are clearly high as a kite, they pack another bowl, then another.
There is an old adage “You arent getting any higher just lower on weed” and it’s true.
One last thing. If you are a reviewer please stop mentioning clearly dodgy activity like vaping in a car or in public. If someone wants to use a device to break the law let them figure that out by themself.
Also, referring to your ADV (all day vape) as a “daily driver” just no. Metrics matter and our opponents are watching.
Seriously... why is this so common?
World class first world rant.Every time I watch a video review the reviewers seem to have a thing about exhaling a cloud of unabsorbed vapor.
To me this makes no sense. You payed for that herb, you want it to be as effective as possible.
Hold that hit in and let it absorb.
Also taking hits so massive they exhale a huge cloud of waisted vapor then proceed to harsh out and start coughing. What is this... amateur hour? Stop abusing yourself.
Then, when they are clearly high as a kite, they pack another bowl, then another.
There is an old adage “You arent getting any higher just lower on weed” and it’s true.
One last thing. If you are a reviewer please stop mentioning clearly dodgy activity like vaping in a car or in public. If someone wants to use a device to break the law let them figure that out by themself.
Also, referring to your ADV (all day vape) as a “daily driver” just no. Metrics matter and our opponents are watching.
Seriously... why is this so common?
But you also lose more bills with 300. More escape, whereas you might get all 3, or at least two thirds. Im not disagreeing with your logic here about saturation peak etc, but there is a line to be drawn in what percentage of bills are not caught as the amount increases.Imagine you are in one of those booths that you attempt to snatch money floating in the air. Is it easier with 3 bills or 300? That is you and vapor. The density of the vapor allows you to maximise absorption and monitor for when to re up.
It is people like this as well as the people who light massive joints at rallies that gives all of us users a negative shadow...
In the same vein, I asked about Cannabis Youtubers in a previous thread. I think it may be a fine line between simulated vaping/smoking buddies and shear entertainment. As @Diggy Smalls mentioned, he (like me) occasionally have no one to vape with and Cannabis Youtubers assist us in not feeling so isolated.
http://fuckcombustion.com/threads/is-your-vaping-buddy-live-or-digitized.25954/
what ever the reasons are , try and not let it bother you OP .
you tube vids aside , people smoke expensive cigars , or puff on pipe tobacco with out inhaling just for the pleasure and taste . i have many times vaped with my vape cap without inhaling just for my own enjoyment in doing so . i might tend to do this with some of my cheaper strains but i like it .
Showing off that with this device you too can be “that guy” that blows clouds and annoys everyone.
Or is this a weed version of the Jackass show.
Agreed. It's hilarious when you see their eyes go "wonky" in the middle of the hit. I would think videos like this are 100% worse for MJ's image than someone blowin a fat vapor cloud or sparking a huge doober at a rally. JMO.What i think is wasteful is when i video of a dude trying to dab 14 grams of shatter at once or another dude doing like 30 grams at once. That is wasteful and nearly pointless.
I'm not watching a ShowerHead video (or a Supreme, Evo, Sub, GS XLR, etc.) to see how well it pumps out the blue vapor.I personally think waste of huge vapor clouds is a good thing in videos. Sometimes it gives me a sense of the vape's possible vapor production
Maybe not upset, but a you seem a little agitated. Let the cloud chasers chase I say. But, that's just like, my opinion & stuff man.It's kind of funny to me that it upsets you so much
I think it is because so many of us come from combustion and love "big clouds" from the "good" (rather bad) old times. It took me nearly a year (and a Vapman) to give a fuck about visible vapor while exhaling and to realize that it is not the "big cloud" that gets me baked, but the efficiency of my vaporizer when it comes to extraction. In fact, I only stopped caring one week ago.
So: Fuck combustion! Fuck big clouds! One Love! Get high with wispy hits - Your lung will sing "Hallelujah" out of gratitude and you save LOTS of your precious material while still getting high like a stoned weasel.
...and I'm booking the airline tickets now! so it's gonna be like 16-18 hours...If you're not using your vaporizer exclusively at max temperature you're wasting as much cannabinoids as exhaling early.
Although personally I don't believe holding in hits increases effectiveness. I do think it causes more vapor to condense into sticky residue which accumulates on the lungs though...
I definitely don't find multiple small hits to equal a big one, anyones welcome to come rip my Showerhead at 777 if you truly feel that way.
My only problem comes when I try to apply my standard to others.
If you're not using your vaporizer exclusively at max temperature you're wasting as much cannabinoids as exhaling early.
Although personally I don't believe holding in hits increases effectiveness. I do think it causes more vapor to condense into sticky residue which accumulates on the lungs though...
I definitely don't find multiple small hits to equal a big one, anyones welcome to come rip my Showerhead at 777 if you truly feel that way.
Dude, only the first part of first paragraph was for you. Anything not about temperature was not directed at you. Geez, I hope you don't think that because I am pretty stream of consciousness most days. But I am tickled pink that anyone at all got the "Stripes" reference. Genius. Any of youse touch my stuff and I'll kill ya. That film has so many classic lines. @Boden you seem light enough, sorry for any miscommunications.
LOLDude, only the first part of first paragraph was for you. Anything not about temperature was not directed at you. Geez, I hope you don't think that because I am pretty stream of consciousness most days. But I am tickled pink that anyone at all got the "Stripes" reference. Genius. Any of youse touch my stuff and I'll kill ya. That film has so many classic lines. @Boden you seem light enough, sorry for any miscommunications.
I deny any malicious intent and blame the FC mods as well as the interwebs at large.
Love, p_j
That’s the opposite of what is happening in this case. We are not absorbing a gas but an aerosol. The aerosol needs time to settle on the surface of your lungs.
Still not convinced that holding in is better than the re-breathing technique, but I find the latter much more natural and comfortable, especially when doing it through the nose, makes for really tasty/smelly exhales when covering the receptors inside there.
We had that discussion extensively in another thread in the past, including IIRC some answers by guys working in the biology field. And I mostly recall the oxygen deprivation argument, the saturation and absorption rate which was time-bound and required fresh air supply and that re-breathing could be preferable.
But as always, whatever floats your boat!