What do you prefer BHO or ISO

Mflbparox

Member
which one do you prefer and why?

which one do you think is easier.

i think that iso would be easier and better than bho is
 
Mflbparox,

scottio19

scotty
most would say that bho is a better quality hash. at least that is what I have gathered from my research on fuckcombustion, grasscity, and other forums.

iso is easier as well as safer, but the entire process takes longer because it doesn't evaporate instantly like butane
 
scottio19,

smartrott

Active Member
The tastiest concentrate that I have gotten to try would have to be some Double Deadhead Iso. It was delicious and very, very strong. It does cost 60$ a gram though compared to the 30-35 a gram for the bho.
 
smartrott,

Lo

Combustion free since '09
I think it's like comparing high quality herb to dirt weed myself.

ISO is for those of us too chicken or not able to make BHO. I don't envision anyone saying they'd prefer ISO given the choice ;) If I lived in medical state - I'd have BHO in hand now. Just my :2c:
 
Lo,

smokum

I am who I am and your approval isn't needed!
I like qwiso in winter..... too dry to safely run BHO in the dry air of winter with chances of static sparks.

But I do prefer BHO when there's a choice. Both quicker to complete/finish and the taste/strength is so much better in my opinion.

edit: spelling
 
smokum,

AGBeer

Lost in Thought
Not being a fan of either I have noticed that the majority of folk seem to prefer BHO. Some go further than others in refining it but, BHO appears the maj.

I have seen a small handful of folk that preferred the properly done (frozen/short run/decarbed) ISO. They compared the ISO as being more floral and flavorful and BHO being more 'hashy' tasting. Definitely the minority.

Then you have the dry sift/bubble folk. Sometimes its funny to watch them bicker with the BHO folk about whos better (but it gets old really fast) How about CO2HO? :D You gotta figure I live in a nonmed state so all of my observations are just that ;)
 
AGBeer,
Top Bottom