They don't like using it even though it's legal (in Washington) because of all the messages they've gotten over the years.
This is what intrigues me. How perception and categorisation works in a post illegal world.
Legality vs stigma , medicine vs enjoyment and the perception of who fits where.
If you are prescribed morphine for a long time, you can be just as much a heroine (opiate) addict as your commonal garden smack head.
You can also argue that after a point a street heroine addict is no longer a recreational user, and it becomes medicine because without it they become very sick indeed.
I caught a gimps of the Jeremy Kyle show, and he was ripping into some kid because he smokes weed plus having a right dig at his ex-girlfriend for having got pregnant by a stoner dope head. The audience cheered and clapped profusely to his rhetoric!
How do you think that made me feel literally a month from becoming a father.
How would this perception and attitude change if it should ever be made legal or at least decriminalised in the U.K.?
We can't have scumbags like Jeremy Vile spewing his bile on national T.V.
How do you change this ignorant and arrogant attitude of the general public?
Hell even in legal states, you still get that dick head in the DEA calling MMJ a joke.
So is it only truly medicine if you pretend you don't like it?