Yep. Big bowls and water filtration encourage big hits and you'll definitely use more herb that way. OTOH a vape with a small bowl that restricts hit size may be frustrating all the time. That's why a lot of people end up with something that encourages conservation of herb, and another something that can provide the big hits. The price range on good electric powered vapes ranges from around $100 to over $500, so there's a lot to choose from. One of the best buys on the low end is the Vapolution- small bowl and an all glass vapor path (both valued and rare anywhere near this price point), and the Vapo guys have been offering members a great deal-$100 with the 8" glass bowl, which usually sells for $20 by itself. http://fuckcombustion.com/threads/vapolution-2-0.4940/ This model will let you load very small amounts or more, for lung filling but manageable hits. A big hitter that's very popular and a proven design is the Da Buddha, for around $150. As mentioned, the Solo is a good portable, as a cross between a pocket portable (like the Inhalater) and a home model. There are other good models too. Take a look at the fattest vape threads for the most popular models.vorrange said:For conserving bud you should try and choose vaporizers that use small bowls and have efficient extractions.
"In the field of pharmacology, potency is a measure of drug activity expressed in terms of the amount required to produce an effect of a given intensity."Potency isn't a concern, one model to another. You apply heat and you get vapor. Some are just easier to use than others.
To this I say think of this hole theory like a bong and a joint. With a joint, yeh you can get hits straight to the brain since it's pretty much just smoke directly to your bloodstream, but with a bong, even though you are losing potency from water and percs, you can smoke a hole joints worth of cannabis in one hit. it saturates your lung in one blast. yeh."In the field of pharmacology, potency is a measure of drug activity expressed in terms of the amount required to produce an effect of a given intensity."
-wikipedia
Given this definition, I have to disagree.
shorter path lengths have less losses, even if you recover the actives left behind on the surface of the air path, I believe much will still be lost. because as you cool vapor, it becomes visible, meaning you're no longer dealing with vapor as much as you are dealing with vapor condensate. I theorize that much of this active substance is lost on the mucous coating of the lungs, which jives with all of my anecdotal evidence.
for a desktop unit, the most efficiency/efficacy/conservation comes from the smallest bowls and the shortest, most insulating vapor path, as well as the highest temps. look for a short plastic tube through which the vapor will travel.
or you could consider the Gnome or Ubie which are the most potent portables.
be forewarned, the downside to potency is pain, lots of it, as hot, dry air really irritates the lungs.
but it is quite potent with amounts you would have previously considered impossible to get away with.
I can pretend like what you've said makes sense. If it makes you happy.To this I say think of this hole theory like a bong and a joint. With a joint, yeh you can get hits straight to the brain since it's pretty much just smoke directly to your bloodstream, but with a bong, even though you are losing potency from water and percs, you can smoke a hole joints worth of cannabis in one hit. it saturates your lung in one blast. yeh.
I can pretend like what you've said makes sense. If it makes you happy.
I don't think there is a thread for the ubie. http://www.americansmokeless.com/thanks for the replies guys. I'm going to read the threads for the vapes you suggested and go from there. Also, is there anything I can read about temps etc
Also, is there anything I can read about temps etc