This could be bad....................

lwien

Well-Known Member
................for dispensaries here in Los Angeles. Reposted from another site from a local attorney warning LA co-ops.

WARNING-ALL MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARIES IN LOS ANGELES

Tomorrow, District Atty. Steve Cooley and Los Angeles City Attorney Carmen Trutanich will be speaking at a luncheon training meeting of narcotics officers in the greater Los Angeles area.

Before you read further, it is necessary to relate why I am writing to you authoritatively. I have been practicing criminal law in Los Angeles for 35 years, am the past president of the Los Angeles Criminal Courts Bar Assoc. Cooley and I have been friends for roughly 20 years. Between my trying death penalty cases, I enjoy representing growers, vendors and clinics in the medical marijuana community and now represent a dozen Southern California clinics on a monthly retainer basis, and I have been doing so since 2005. If you need more of my bona fides, go to my website: havecrimewilltravel.com. This is not an advertisement. IT IS THE BASIS FOR THE WARNING THAT FOLLOWS:

I met privately with Mr. Cooley last Friday for roughly 90 minutes. With respect to our discussions re medical marijuana clinics, I am now convinced that clinic raids likely will occur sometime within the next week or two. The basis for my opinion is Dist. Atty. Cooley's representation to me that tomorrow's luncheon is about strategy and tactics, and therefore attendance at the meeting is limited to law enforcement only. (I tongue-in-cheek offered to buy Cooley and Trutanich lunch if I could come, but was smilingly turned down. Also not a good sign for clinic owners...)

If the DA and the City Attorney had concerns about their legal interpretation of SB 420, it is my opinion that tomorrow's training would not be about tactics. The word "tactics" connotes preparation for action, and preparation for action when directed at narcotics officers overwhelmingly suggests preparations for raids.

"Tactics" in this case probably means educating the narcs regarding their search warrant affidavits - i.e., what factual rendition that would cause a judge to believe an officer's representation that a felony was being committed inside the clinic. The prosecutors are relying on the last two pages of the California Supreme Court decision in People versus Mentch, in which Justice Werdegar, writing for a unanimous Court, states that marijuana may not be sold by someone outside a collective to a collective owner, manager or member.

The prosecutors object to clinics that operate at great profit to the owners (taking them outside the nonprofit status of SB 420). They also object to the vast proliferation of clinics, especially in the city of Los Angeles (and more especially during a ban on clinics opening while the hardship process occurred).

2) They also object to the vast proliferation of clinics, especially in the City of Los Angeles (and more especially considering the proliferation during a ban on clinics opening while the hardship process occurred).

3) The recent proliferation of clinics is mostly caused by people wanting to make money quickly with relatively little outlay when considered against the return on investment. Our office averages about 5-6 calls per day from potentially new entrepreneurs. Some of you are dedicated to marijuana as medicine. I know that. Others are dedicated to making money. You know that.

I expect that the cops, supported by various task forces and the DEA, will raid a significant number (a dozen or more?) clinics very dramatically and with news crews broadcasting, door kicking, dope grabbing, detaining, arresting, etc. behavior. Some law enforcement mucky muck will explain that the clinics violate both state and federal law (thereby meeting A.G. Holders rules for DEA engagement).

So DO THIS NOW to protect yourselves and your patients:

1) Protect your patient records. If you use computers and a modem to run your business you may be a provider within the meaning of the federal HIPAA medical privacy laws, and your patients physicians recommendations must be protected. In addition, the medical information falls within Article 1, Section 1 privacy provisions of the California Constitution. I assure you that the narcs will not care about HIPAA or the State Constitution and will seize your records. Let your lawyer worry about that problem. We actually have skills for this sort of thing.

2) My advice: A) duplicate your entire patient list and physicians recommendations in the next few days, preferably on computer, and preferably cached in a place that is secure (your house is not secure). They will hit your house and take your computer, as well as the clinics computer. Store the records encrypted online or on a CD or DVD or for that matter, a USB transport drive); B) your patient books must remain onsite for you to legally conduct business. However, your accounting books, correspondence and other papers should be removed and stored in a safe place, again not your residence. If the cops want your books, the DA knows how to issue a subpoena, and hopefully your lawyer knows how to quash one; C) The narcs will especially be looking for pays and owes, i.e., notes or lists of what marijuana you purchased, at what price and what you sold that product for at a presumably higher price. It does not matter whether you have used aliases or encrypted names. The list is the list and is a nasty piece of prosecution evidence if the disparity of what you paid and what you sold for is substantial. Put it somewhere safe. They will try to decrypt it, and at a minimum, use expert testimony to explain its intricacies to a jury.

3) Minimize your on-site inventory. They are going to take it, so the more you have, the more you will lose. If somebody else gets hit, breathe a sigh of relief after the next round is over.

4) If you are raided, the cops will order you to open the safe. Presumably, the warrant will cover the contents in any safe, which means their order is legal (read the warrant they have to give you a copy). Open the safe if the cops order it. If you dont cooperate, they will have locksmiths drill the safe. Why waste a good safe? Obviously, it would be good to have nothing of significance inside the safe.

5) These raids will make no sense unless the cops make arrests. The cops may arrest all employees in the dispensary, or just the manager, or just the owner, etc.. We have no way of knowing who or how many in advance. You probably will be charged with violating Health & Safety Code Sec. 11359 (possession for sale a felony). Bail for Sec. 11359 is $20,000 for under a pound, $25,000 for more than 1 lb., $30,000 for more than 10 pounds, $50,000 for more than 25 pounds and $100,000 for over 50 pounds. If you have edibles, they will count the weight of each entire brownie, etc. The smaller the inventory the smaller your bail. Assume you or your employees are going to get arrested NOW, not later, and make preparations to pay for bail. The cops also may cheat and weigh the weed inside its container. Shit happens. Just be ready. Jail is unpleasant.

6) Put aside a serious chunk of money NOW for lawyers. If you own a clinic, you may have a very hard time qualifying for public defender or indigent defense legal services. Employees are more likely to get appointed counsel since they make relatively small money. DO NOT put your bail or attorney money into your BANK. As soon as they can find bank statements, check books, etc., they are going to freeze your accounts, and then try to forfeit your money. They also will tell the bank not to let you have access to your accounts, and your bank will obey. Make alternative plans with people you can trust. You are simply trying to keep your business going under potential adverse circumstances. Your business is legal under California law, and you should take appropriate precautions. Think earthquake, etc..

7) DO NOT under any circumstance deposit or withdraw $10,000 or more from your bank. They are required to report such transactions to the FBI. They also may, but are not required to, report smaller cash deposits and withdrawals.

8) If your patients use an on-site debit or credit card machine, there is a fair chance that IRS forensic accountants will eventually be looking at those transactions. Your books must reflect your patients electronic transactions. There are formulas for extrapolating gross income from credit/debit card data.

9) The cops are not your friends. If they arrest you, they will not go easy on you if you cooperate. They will not talk to the DA on your behalf. They will screw you. They are expressly allowed by the U.S. Supreme Court to lie to you to get you to confess wrongdoing. SHUT UP AND CALL A LAWYER. DO NOT WAIVE YOUR MIRANDA RIGHTS. IF TIME GOES BY, JUST SIT THERE AND BEAR IT.

10) The reason weed costs $400/oz. is because it is legally dangerous to possess, grow, sell or transport. You may take the risk out of dedication to the cause, but some of you make a very healthy living. If it wasnt illegal, everyone could grow it in his/her backyard. Stop bitching. This risk was and is inherent to the business, and presumably your prices incorporate that risk.

11) If you dont have a lawyer, i.e., a criminal lawyer, find one NOW. You will need to call someone when it hits the fan, and criminal lawyers after your arrest will demand to be paid up front, as you have no business relationship. (We deal with criminals. What would you expect?)

12) NORML has a list of approved counsel. I am on that list, but I dont like the list itself. You do not need a marijuana lawyer no matter what other civilians tell you. You need a very very good criminal lawyer, preferably one who does marijuana cases as a part, but not the entirety of, his/her practice.

13) Some idiot out there seems to think that L.A. marijuana defendants require attorneys from the Bay Area, devoted to the cause to defend them. She has tried to explain the rationale to me, and it is nonsense. We have perhaps 100 times as much crime in L.A. as S.F.. Do you really think some out of town dope lawyer is going to scare the D.A.s office? This isnt the Matrix, and you certainly are not Neo. You are going to need help.

If you take this warning seriously, do a mitzvah and inform other clinic owners, etc. Not everyone reads Weedtracker. I already have posted an email to my colleagues on a state-wide encrypted criminal defense attorney bulletin board, and 3 or 4 of us advise our colleagues when it gets too arcane.

I have been giving out free bits of advice on Weedtracker periodically over the last several years just to help folks out and have amassed reputation points to show for it. I strongly urge L.A. CITY and L.A. COUNTY clinic owners to make their preparations NOW. They are coming. The difference for surviving or not surviving personally, for the health of your patients, and for your dispensary is PREPARATION. Good luck.

Charles L. Chuck Lindner
Attorney at Law
Santa Monica
 
lwien,

The_Other_Shoe

What's Going On?
That is very true, that could be bad... Fortunately I live in the Bay Area, and don't have any close ties to any clinic or dispensary which is kinda unfortunate you know :lol:.
 
The_Other_Shoe,

SmogTown

Well-Known Member
I cannot believe how many people just start chatting with the cops who are investigating them. I just wouldn't say shit. You know what's funny whenever a cop gets in trouble, yes that happens up here lol, the first thing they do is quit talking to the other cop and get a lawyer. Even cops don't really trust cops.
 
SmogTown,

SmogTown

Well-Known Member
Thanks for the link. Its good to keep up on things. Yeah there are a few good lawyers. The ones that scare me are the ones that go into politics :lol:.
 
SmogTown,

Hippie Dickie

The Herbal Cube
Manufacturer
great thread, lwien ... thank-you for taking to time to let us all know about this.
 
Hippie Dickie,

DJDIZZY

Well-Known Member
I don't think it helps that Southern California has the most amount of dispensaries of the states that do allow it. Somewhere around 850-950 was the last count I heard. I am grateful to have so many to choose from but something was bound to happen with so many.
 
DJDIZZY,

Purple-Days

Well-Known Member
Anything, man, anything is a step in the right direction. :cool:

An if you are compliant, well...

And if you are not, well... it's a state's rights thing and I'm all for that. :2c:
 
Purple-Days,

lwien

Well-Known Member
Purple-Days said:
....... it's a state's rights thing and I'm all for that. :2c:
Yeah, me too. It's just the stupid ass DA out here has a very warped interpretation of the law but the way the dumb ass regs are set up, it allows HUGE loopholes for just about anyone to jump through from the DA on one end, to the recreational business for profit dispensaries masquerading as medical co-ops. We got over 800 fucking dispensairies out here. More dispensaries than Starbucks or MacDonalds. New strict regs need to be set up so everyone is playing by the same rule book.

But yeah, the feds statement helps. It protects us from the feds, but not necessarily from local law enforcement if they get a hair up their ass to cause trouble which is kinda the way it is here in LA currently.

We just don't have a rule book yet, but the Feds just wrote the preamble. ;)
 
lwien,

Beezleb

Well-Known Member
I am interested to see how other states translates and use the lessons from what is going on now in CA.
 
Beezleb,

tuttle

Well-Known Member
Some more: http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-pot-ordinance23-2009oct23,0,3225170.story

If you are a resident of the City of Los Angeles, I highly recommend you write or call your city council member as well as the council president, Eric Garcetti and let them know how you feel about this. The current polling completed Monday and Tuesday found that 74% of the county's voters support the state's medical marijuana law, while 54% want to see marijuana legalized, regulated and taxed like alcohol. It is critical that the city council not only read these numbers, but they get enough calls and emails from the community to reinforce the fact that they are out of step with their constituents.

Garcetti's contact info is here
and the rest of the council members are here
 
tuttle,

lwien

Well-Known Member
A few co-ops got raided yesterday, with NNCC among them, the largest dispensary in the San Fernando Valley and they were pre-ico. Doesn't look like any of them are safe.
 
lwien,

tuttle

Well-Known Member
This is my email:

I read with dismay council member Garcetti's remarks on the proposed ordinance to restrict or prohibit access to medical marijuana which appeared in today's Los Angels Times. I feel that Mr. Garcettie's comments reflect a willful disregard for the wishes of his constituents want as well as issues of drug safety and availability.

This is a drug that is a safer analgesic that most Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs), which include aspirin, ibuprofen, naproxen, diclofenac, ketoprofen, and tiaprofenic acid. By moving to deny patients access to medical marijuana, Mr. Garcetti is purposuflly putting the people who rely on these drugs at higher risk of death, kidney failure, liver failure, ulcers, and prolonged bleeding after an injury or surgery. I have a good friend who had renal impairment due to heavy reliance on ibuprofen and other NSAIDs. Her doctor recommended marijuana as an alternative, and this change has greatly improved her kidney function.

I implore Mr. Garcetti to rethink his stance on the issue. Please talk to medical professionals to not only determine the medical benefits of this drug, but also its extraordinarily low number of long term side effects. A vote of endorsement for this ordinance flies in the face of both the wishes of the California voters, Mr. Garcetti's immediate constituents (74% of whom approve of medical marijuana laws), and of good science.

Thank you for you time,
 
tuttle,

MoeOnTheMoon

Medical Marijuana Activist
Company Rep
lwien said:
A few co-ops got raided yesterday, with NNCC among them, the largest dispensary in the San Fernando Valley and they were pre-ico. Doesn't look like any of them are safe.
I contacted my City Councilman about ithis about a week ago, and he acknowledged receipt and said he would pass it along to those who need to see it.

I will follow up with a seperate email to Garcetti and to the City Attorney (though I think the City Attorney has NO ears on this subject, he's made up his mind to be anti-mmj).

On what basis are they busting these dispensaries? I have not had time to read the articles the past week. I figure it's some kind of technicality and heard it had something to do with the dispensaries not growing their own (i.e. buying from members to sell to members). This seems like a pretty easy thing to do - if the growers join the co-op. what's the problem? But maybe I am not understanding the issue.

Basically the issue is that we have a dickwad for a City Attorney!

I do agree that there are too many dispensaries and I'm sure some of them are not following the letter of the law.
 
MoeOnTheMoon,
Top Bottom