for the people who actually bought the iolite over a year ago, $240 for an iolite without an optimizer might not have felt like the best use of my money
Although the original retail price was $250, internet savvy buyers could get one at the pre-sale price of $200, and a year ago it was a two year old model available many places on-line for much less than retail.
The iolite would be hard to clean
I guess that depends on how you use it. I've been using a three year old unit on a regular basis and it has required very little cleaning at all. I consider the iolite to be one of the easiest models on the market to keep clean, so again, opinions vary, and cleaning needs are determined by how you use it, as well as how often. I've found that loading light, vs. a full bowl, makes for less cleaning no matter how frequently it's used.
The iolite would take about 3-4 re-heats between hits for it to reach [my] optimal [milky-but-not-smokey] temperature, but with the optimizer it would only take 2.
I've never really counted the cycles. I always start to hit it after it reaches vaping temp in 90 sec.-2 min. and I'm fine with that-purely a difference of personal preference. The best flavor can be had early in the heating process.
The plastic mouthpiece would burn my lips and start to slide right off from built-up resin
The extension worked fine for me, and even without it, an easy draw prevented too much heat IMO. Hitting it harder will surely be more uncomfortable, and doesn't do much for the taste either, IMO. A little food grade tubing to extend the length has been popular since they first started shipping. As for residue in the mouthpiece, that's just a matter of a quick cleaning with a pipe cleaner. Built up residue in the mouthpiece has never been an issue for me.
You could barely see the orange butane light
Never had that problem. Even in direct sunlight I just use my hand as a funnel so the light is easily seen. They did do a better job of visibility on the wispr, with the larger light, but the iolite light has never been a source of frustration for me, as far as being able to see the color change.
it would often take 3-5clicks to start up
For me, using several different units at one time or another, one click was usually enough. Getting ignition can and definitely has been a problem with some units, but for me it hasn't been the norm.
To me, really hot means too hot to hold, and even holding by the vented area, where it's hottest, has never caused me pain or dropsies. The wispr also gets hot. With both units you have to know where to hold it. Holding the 'guts side' of either unit isn't comfortable.
there's no butane fuel-gauge
If they'd added that to the iolite, it would have been even more expensive. You don't want to make your initial product too pricy when you're a company new to vaporizers. You also want to make sure there's enough demand for a more expensive model, with more features and a higher price. O&B used this forum extensively for feedback on what people wanted as far as better features and improvements. They always had it in mind to offer more than one model at different price points. They've been making butane fueled tools for years. They were new to vaporizers, but not new to producing and marketing products.
it slides/falls off of surfaces easy because it's rounded
The wispr's shape is better or worse, depending on what you're trying to do with it. A lot of people prefer the iolite's shape to that of the wispr. Another instance of personal preference according to how and where you use it.
definitely draws people's curiosity.
Depending on the person viewing it, and the situation where it's viewed, the wispr could draw even more curiousity. At a distance the iolite can pass for a large cell phone or two way radio.
I wouldn't expect anybody to be offended when I call the original design pitiful
If anyone is offended, that's their problem. You didn't go off the deep end in your criticism, your view is just an extreme one, and your original post could have used an 'I think' or 'IMO'.
As for the price, like I said, savvy shoppers have never needed to pay full retail, and for a while it was widely availble (even on dealer sites) for as little as $99. And price, as far as being 'worth it', is always a matter of personal opinion.
I think they Wispr is what Oglesby and Butler were going for with the original iolite.
No, the wispr is what they had in mind for a 2nd, higher priced offering. What they included in the more expensive model was determined by the satifaction level of buyers of the iolite. This is not my opinion. It's info gained directly from an Oglesby.
I want a vape that does what it's supposed to do without any "little tricks".
For me, the wispr only needs the same one 'trick' that the iolite does- an extension for the mouthpiece. And in some instances, the iolite works better with an extension, since the wispr mouthpiece is too flexible to hold up tubing without flopping over. I have to attach the black iolite extension so it stands straight up, and that means a slight sacifice on length and a bigger one on visibility. The iolite, riding in my shirt pocket with a clear piece of tubing attached, is much easier to hit both hands free, and more stealthy as well, with clear tubing.
So, all in all, my use of this type of vape, in preferences and how much it gets used, is very different from yours. If I were to use the kind of terminology you're using, with "pitiful", my opinion of the worthiness of the wispr's improvements, for the extra money, could be 'pathetic'. And in case you haven't read much of the thread, I do own both models. For you the wispr is a much better vaporizer than the iolite. For me it's better, but for my vaping preferences and how much I use a portable, whether it's worth the extra $ or not is iffy. I'm glad you like the wispr, but if you plan to post here more in the future, I hope you'll qualify your opinions more on the basis of what you're looking for in a vape's performance, and how you use it, vs. using more absolute terminology.