The Pax is not built to be an art piece or some pin-up calendar that never sees any use, it is an extremely functional and incredibly portable vaporizer. It might not be as efficient as the Inh but if you are going to do a comparison you should at least mention how much easier the Pax is to throw in a pocket and go.
Also the Pax gets about 6x 10min 0.25g sessions on a charge:
That is terrible battery life! Is that accurate?
Yes, the pax wasn't designed to be just a piece of eye candy and it
does perform very well. If I had an unlimited, free supply of herb, I would: 1) use the pax as my daily driver and 2) freak out.
Sadly, that's not the case so I resort to other vapes if I'm trying to maximize my supply.
However, I don't think that we can completely ignore the aesthetics of the pax. I'm sure that the designers put a ton of thought into its final "look" (duh) and, like myself, the design played a part in many customers' decisions to purchase.
I totally agree that the pax is a top-notch stealth vape and it's my go-to when I know I'm going to be walking around for a significant portion of the day. I don't have an inh (yet), so I can't attest to how big it feels in my hands and in my pocket. But based on the pics I've seen and the dimensions listed on the site, I'm pretty sure that my pax will my remain my preferred vape for stealth missions.
The things that intrigue me the most about the inh are its use of a capsule/cartridge system, 10 level temp control, potentially better efficiency than the pax, and the ability to use a pass-thru.
My inh is on its way and once it arrives I hope to do a heads up comparison in my lab (aka couch) and report back.