• We are experiencing temporary outages. Keep trying, it does recover. We hope to rectify this as soon as possible.

The Bookworm Corner

el sargantano

Well-Known Member
Currently finishing 'We' by Ievgueni Zamiatin in... (drums) 1921!!
Magnificient, a classic must read, unsuspected viewpoint, higienic and brilliant.
It's the real first distopy where Huxley & Orwell base upon their ones, but from the inner part of a totalitarian state.
The barrier between android/humans dillutes a bit in a if I can call it 'soviet classic way'.
Lil Bud 4 flower & VapCap 4 hash makes my brain rush!
 

el sargantano

Well-Known Member
Well, during these strange times I've been reading. To take a break from microbs sinergies I stumbled upon 1961 'Return from the stars' by Stanislaw Lem (the Solaris writer).
Good one. Deeply sad, depicts the loneliness of a cosmonaut on his first day back to Earth after a hundred years long space trip. No family, no friends and a completly changed society where he cannot fit in.
Obsolete, rejected & isolated hero trying to find his place in an alienate society.
Lem makes you think on existencialism and your goals.
Good read, tho not so happy.
 

Philabrookla

@philabrookla
The lady and I are getting back into reading. Her friend started a book club, their first read is Exit West by Mohsin Hamid. Supposedly a candidly poignant take on Israel/Palestine relations.

For me, I decided to start acquiring books that I've been wanting to read, mainly recommended by guests on podcasts. Love Lex Fridman's podcast.

The first is American Cosmic by Diana Walsh Pasulka, and then I am going for Debt: the First 5000 Years by David Graeber. Feel free to ask me about these.

One thing I wanted to add, before ordering a ton of books from Jeff Bezos, we went to our local bookstore. They had my lady's book, and they ordered my 2 books for me, same price as Amazon, to arrive this week. What is the opposite of guilt? Righteousness? Yup. Righteous.
 

Greenteam

Less ego. More soul.
:hmm:The lady and I are getting back into reading. Her friend started a book club, their first read is Exit West by Mohsin Hamid. Supposedly a candidly poignant take on Israel/Palestine relations.

For me, I decided to start acquiring books that I've been wanting to read, mainly recommended by guests on podcasts. Love Lex Fridman's podcast.

The first is American Cosmic by Diana Walsh Pasulka, and then I am going for Debt: the First 5000 Years by David Graeber. Feel free to ask me about these.

One thing I wanted to add, before ordering a ton of books from Jeff Bezos, we went to our local bookstore. They had my lady's book, and they ordered my 2 books for me, same price as Amazon, to arrive this week. What is the opposite of guilt? Righteousness? Yup. Righteous.
+1 for supporting your local bookstore, I started to change my buying behaviour with regard to that more and more , although it's sometimes convenient to buy online or from bigger stores. My last book was 'The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy' but although normally I like that type of humour, I couldn't really warm up to it. But I read it in German, so maybe it depends on the challenge to translate the given Humor in another language, like in TV series from UK or US, lots of friends only watch the original version.
My next book will be 'Water Music' by T.C. Boyle, my first book from him was 'Budding Prospects', i liked it a lot, so I'm excited about his other books.
 
Last edited:
Greenteam,

FlyingLow

Team NO SLEEP!
Just picked up Widespread Panic in the Streets of Athens Georgia... this show was a heater!
Any FC'ers in attendance?



In April 1998, legendary southern jam band Widespread Panic held a free open-air record release show in downtown Athens, Georgia, its homebase. No one involved could have known that the predicted crowd of twenty thousand would prove to be nearly five times that size. The ultimately successful show, now known as “Panic in the Streets,” went on to become a cult favorite of Panic fans and a decisive moment in Athens music history. This event still holds the record for the world’s largest record release party, but the full story of how the event came to be has not been told until now.

Widespread Panic in the Streets of Athens, Georgia places readers at the historic event, using in-depth investigation and interviews with the band, city officials, and “Spread Heads” who were there. Told as much as possible in real time, music journalist Gordon Lamb’s narrative takes the reader from conception to aftermath and uncovers the local controversies and efforts that nearly stopped the show from happening altogether.

This deeply researched and richly sourced book follows every stage of the concert’s development from the spark of an idea to approximately one hundred thousand people from all over the world packing the streets of a legendary music town. Taking us back to 1990s Athens through vibrant, on-the-scene writing, Lamb gives us the story of a band on the verge of greatness and a town reckoning with its significant place in music history.
 
FlyingLow,

Green420

Well-Known Member
Read the preface and first Chapter of David Cooper's Psychiatry and Anti Psychiatry. The purpose of this book is to reverse the trajectory of blame, from being held by the prejudices of society, and being places on schizophrenic patients, to looking at the way the schizophrenic patient is not a fixed idea, but rather never repeats. It's very Deleuzian, it's basically a way of saying that the way we look at schizophrenia is not so much an illness that corresponds to something in the brain, but rather schizophrenia relates to a "dialectical" "totality" which takes on different aspects throughout the person's life. So a person can become a certain way because of the events in their life, and often times we blame the schizophrenic patient for acting in a way which is socially unacceptable, and we see the schizophrenic as fixed, whereas Cooper wants to look at people as a mobile totality, not a straight line. Cooper does indeed use line metaphors in a way that breaks away from them, much like a line of flight in Deleuze and Guattari, reference how true repetition is impossible, also like D & G. I would say this rare paperback spits hot fire, one of the best things I've read all summer.

513912340_23905669682453974_550003048598392661_n.jpg
 

Bazinga

Well-Known Member
Read the preface and first Chapter of David Cooper's Psychiatry and Anti Psychiatry. The purpose of this book is to reverse the trajectory of blame, from being held by the prejudices of society, and being places on schizophrenic patients, to looking at the way the schizophrenic patient is not a fixed idea, but rather never repeats. It's very Deleuzian, it's basically a way of saying that the way we look at schizophrenia is not so much an illness that corresponds to something in the brain, but rather schizophrenia relates to a "dialectical" "totality" which takes on different aspects throughout the person's life. So a person can become a certain way because of the events in their life, and often times we blame the schizophrenic patient for acting in a way which is socially unacceptable, and we see the schizophrenic as fixed, whereas Cooper wants to look at people as a mobile totality, not a straight line. Cooper does indeed use line metaphors in a way that breaks away from them, much like a line of flight in Deleuze and Guattari, reference how true repetition is impossible, also like D & G. I would say this rare paperback spits hot fire, one of the best things I've read all summer.

513912340_23905669682453974_550003048598392661_n.jpg
Probably too difficult for me to absorb.
 
Bazinga,

Green420

Well-Known Member
Added this 3000 year anthology to my list of summer reads. 56 pages into Reich, 85 pages into Boss, 20 pages into Becker, 40 pages of Cooper, and on 237 in my full summary walkthrough I'm doing of Anti Oedipus with my friend. Dropped Perlman's Letters of insurgents due to the surprise 700+ book and growing gift. Going through other books too, but I made the most progress with these. I could use more thinkers like Reich. Here's some notes on the books.
Some notes about The Mass Psychology of Fascism by Wilhelm Reich. Just read 15+ pages of the preface and a few pages of the first chapter last night, I was wondering when the preface would end, but when I had checked it was a quick read and I was already finished with it, with only a couple pages to go. If anyone's ever seen Mysteries of the Organism, the movie about Wilhelm Reich, Reich was a psychoanalyst who Deleuze said the community "never forgave" for his turn to vitalism. He built "the orgone accumulator" to capture this vital energy from the atmosphere in a small outhouse looking box you stand inside, but it was quackery. But if you read his account against fascism, and watch his movie, you get the sense he was a wildly sexually liberated leftcom of some sort? Who is critical of right wing Marxism, and uses his vitalism of the orgone against the repression of "small man syndrome" of fascism. Very influential on Deleuze and Guattari, as well as one I have not read as much, Bergson who was influential on Deleuze's vitalism, along with Nietzsche.


Read like 26 more pages of Wilhelm Reich's The Mass Psychology of Fascism. A very relevant book. The thing about Reich which is interesting is he was really against metaphysics, and mysticism - thinks mysticism is reactionary - but yet has his own vitalist ideas that led him to thinking a box collects vital energy when you sit in it. He actually was remarkably sharp, his theories reflect so much of what Deleuze and Guattari say about the family. Namely that the family is a small state apparatus, which is important for instilling the fascist tendency in people through authoritarianism. Reich pinpoints the primal scene of sorts of fascism to be the repression of masturbation. In other words, Reich has a somewhat different view of Freud, where Freud often talks about a sort of sexuality which is not sexual, often from early memories in childhood, Reich believes that there's a psychosexual repression which is about literal sex which fascism suppresses.

Reich looks at how fascists co-opted socialism, and then betrayed socialists, the fascists saying they wanted to bolster the peasants, and galvanize the middle class through scapegoating, the purposeful suppression of facts, and a rabid geo-political insecurity which the fascists capitalize on. The mega-machine that Deleuze and Guattari talk about in Anti Oedipus, this is deeply connected with the social machinery that Wilhelm Reich talks about. There are capitalist machines in the psyche, but they are not overdetermined by economics; Reich attacks Karl Marx for over-emphasizing the economic in the psyche. Reich emphasizes not only the economic, but also the sexual, and the systems of control that go down to the very foundation of one's psychology through development. Looking at not only individual psychology, but "mass psychology" is how Reich examines fascism.

Read 26 pages of Medard Boss's Psychoanalysis and Daseinanalysis, a form of analysis inspired by Martin Heidegger. A sexually liberated form of analysis that looks not at what is real and not real, but rather looks at unconcealing the symbolic meaning of his schizophrenic patient. Boss uses the example of the patient that made him discover Daseinanalysis. At first, he believed that there were true and false statements that could be applied to schizophrenic patients. The patient goes through phases of development as she explores her identity, some rather dirty details. Aside from that, she was nursed by a bottle by Medard Boss, and in the end she said she was "cured" of her illness of seeing masks, and schizophrenic hallucinations, such as spies trying to get her and saw off her legs. Daseinanalysis says not that these symbolic hallucinations are wrong, but to let them happen, and embrace where they take you. The patient says it was because Boss was in continuous contact with her that it made her feel as though she could exist with her unconscious. Here we have a very Deleuze and Guattari adjacent idea, that repression of schizophrenic tendencies is not healthy, rather it is as it implies - repressive.

In the second chapter of Cooper's book, there is an emphasis on the violence of family life. Families will often put a lot of restrictions on people, and they become they purveyor of inhuman arrays of symptoms, and have no individuality because the "wrong" must be systematically removed from them. Whereas Cooper wants to say, that these are social stigmas imposed on the schizophrenic patient, and violent behavior often comes from a series of events which were violent on the patient. The schizophrenic is seen as they "author of the totally superfluous deed" to paraphrase, in the eyes of society, and only recently people have begun to look at violence on schizophrenic patients, in Cooper's time.
 

Bazinga

Well-Known Member
Added this 3000 year anthology to my list of summer reads. 56 pages into Reich, 85 pages into Boss, 20 pages into Becker, 40 pages of Cooper, and on 237 in my full summary walkthrough I'm doing of Anti Oedipus with my friend. Dropped Perlman's Letters of insurgents due to the surprise 700+ book and growing gift. Going through other books too, but I made the most progress with these. I could use more thinkers like Reich. Here's some notes on the books.
Impressive reads.
 
Bazinga,

florduh

Well-Known Member
I'm finally finishing The Expanse series. For my money, it's a better story about a starship crew than any Star Trek :shrug:

img_1092.jpg


At one point in the book I'm on now, a much more powerful military force starts doing a land (space?) grab. They take over a space station and begin a brutal occupation. One of the characters goes on to describe The Churn

Kenzo: It must be nice, having everything figured out like that.
Amos: Ain’t nothing to do with me: we’re just caught in The Churn, that’s all.
Kenzo: I have no idea what you just said.
Amos: This boss I used to work for in Baltimore, he called it The Churn. When the rules of the game change.
Kenzo: What game?
Amos: The only game. Survival. When the jungle tears itself down and builds itself into something new. Guys like you and me, we end up dead. Doesn’t really mean anything. Or, if we happen to live through it, well that doesn’t mean anything either.

And just after...

Alex: “This is Medina Station… …It's not Baltimore."
Amos: "Everywhere's Baltimore."

The occupation force installs a Governor who is very angry about "terrorist" attacks from the natives. He asks, "why do these bigots hate us" as if he didn't just steal their home. The Governor then considers tunring off the air in the station, killing every native, so the new settlers can live in safety.

I'm glad this is science fiction and has no relevance to the modern world:nod:
 
florduh,

Bazinga

Well-Known Member
Wait - is this the same Expanse that was a television series? Great looking women. And Jane was a guy. I had no idea there was a book series.
 
Bazinga,

florduh

Well-Known Member
Great looking women
:brow:
maxresdefault.jpg


Wait - is this the same Expanse that was a television series?

Yes. If you enjoyed the series, the books are excellent. The writers, Daniel Abraham and Ty Franck..... I don't know how to put this nicely. I read a lot of sci-fi. A lot of sci-fi writers....seem like they've never had sex :shrug:

They don't know how to write women or even human beings generally. Seems like they never leave their homes or interact with the world. Ty and Daniel... they write like they've had sex before. Very believable characters throughout.

The TV series ends with the 6th book. There is a 30 year time jump between the 6th and 7th books. So all the characters are in their 70's! (Except for the sexy grannie pictured below who is in her early 100s)

The writers started a new series, which is also excellent.

mercygodssummerpreview.jpg
 
florduh,

Rodney

Well-Known Member
This is a decent read and good self help book

ELuvBQw.jpeg



I have many books, mostly biblical related and christian self help books and a few Wilbur Smith adventure novel. Is mostly the Bible I read :)
 
Rodney,

el sargantano

Well-Known Member
There was a thread from several years ago where we talked mainly about sci-fi:


Maybe is it worthy to merge them together @Stu & mods?
 
el sargantano,

Bazinga

Well-Known Member
:brow:
maxresdefault.jpg




Yes. If you enjoyed the series, the books are excellent. The writers, Daniel Abraham and Ty Franck..... I don't know how to put this nicely. I read a lot of sci-fi. A lot of sci-fi writers....seem like they've never had sex :shrug:

They don't know how to write women or even human beings generally. Seems like they never leave their homes or interact with the world. Ty and Daniel... they write like they've had sex before. Very believable characters throughout.

The TV series ends with the 6th book. There is a 30 year time jump between the 6th and 7th books. So all the characters are in their 70's! (Except for the sexy grannie pictured below who is in her early 100s)

The writers started a new series, which is also excellent.

mercygodssummerpreview.jpg
That's the lady whose voice sounds like she smokes about 10 packs a day.
 
Bazinga,
  • Like
Reactions: florduh

bellona0544

Well-Known Member
I just started the 10th anniversary edition of "An Indigenous Peoples' History of the United States". Highly recommended read for anyone who wants to get a look at how this nation was founded on settler-colonialism and ethnic cleaning even while promoting a narrative of "melting pots" and multiculturalism. It will also challenge some ideas you may subconsciously hold about Manifest Destiny.
 

Green420

Well-Known Member
I am currently working my way through chapter 3, section 9 of Deleuze and Guattari's Anti Oedipus one of the central chapters of the book. They've been talking about how capitalism is a territorializing machine. The mega-machine is a large collector of petty debts, and it is the internalized superego, the policeman in your head which represents the move psychologically from Feudalism, which was defined solely by the state, to the mega-machine. The mega-machine is contrasted to technical machines, for instance, a clock, vs the global market which is Leviathanic in that it has tentacles for Perlman. But while Deleuze and Guattari do not use the same tentacle metaphor, they do talk about a sort of mega-machine which is independent of the technical machines - for instance a fork (technical machine) vs the justice system (the mega-machine). One might also remember Hobbes Leviathan. In this section, number 9.

Deleuze claims that capitalism is not the disillusion of Feudalism, that is why there was so much time in between. D & G take shot at Hegel saying the only universal history is contingency, and why European history? Why not Japanese, Chinese, Islamic, etc. The schizophrenic voyage is the only kind there is, implying that one is not territorialized as an identity like a nation implies a single, stable identity? Capitalism itself represents the decoding of flows, so it represents the capture of all the meaning into something very similar to Guy Debord's Spectacle. The spectacle is an image, which consumes everything around it - in this way the significance of all semiotics, signs and symbols, becomes sucked into a capitalist adjacent lifestyle, and implication. Everything has a price or reflects on the mega-machines deterritorialization of old ways of life, which is otherwise known as colonialism. Capitalism for Deleuze and Guattari, as they say in no uncertain terms in an earlier chapter, is colonialism.

Deleuze and Guattari take aim at humanism, saying that there's a god-capital, like Lugalzaggizi Optimus Maximus from Perlman's Against His-Story, Against Leviathan, the god of war which has been enshrined on the dollar. They say that humanism is cynicism and a strange piety. The strange piety is god-capital, and the cynicism is a means of extorting surplus labor. The very act of money begetting money, surplus value being extracted, is the beginning of the capitalism machine. The capitalism machine becomes "anus and vampire," saying much like Perlman that capitalism is dead labor, and sucks of the life from living labor, like the Leviathan sucks potentiality out of people and subordinates them to the mega-machine. It is anal, because the debt and creditor relation occurs early in childhood, with the giving and recieving of feces as is the beginning of the relation of giving and withholding. So in other words, capitalism codes everything through an anal drive, which holds or expels money, the equivalent of shit, and it is the Leviathan which is the arbiter of this vast array of invisible, mechanic flow of literal materials, and the implication of what possibilities are extended that shine forth through their semiotic code.

Deleuze and Guattari talk about how displacement is a core feature of capitalism. Keeping developing nations poor increases surplus value, Franz Fanon can attest to this. Investors would come to Africa and form a bourgeois class, and the poor of Africa would not actually see any benefits that the bourgeoisie said they would give them, instead the French government killed and harshly repressed the Africans. America felt Lumumba threatened US interests in Africa and that is why assassins were sent to kill him. Capitalism runs on "primitive accumulation" deterritorializing previous territories, in order to decode the flows into capital. That is why they keep attacking Palestinians, because they want land, capital. Capitalism turns code to flux, flows of code are on the interior and exterior of the machine, which form "elements of a technology, even a science." Machines do not create capitalism, capitalism creates machines. Unrealized surplus value creates unemployment and stagnation, as the machines inside of you depend on the mega-machine and its control of petty debts. There is "knowledge capital" the decoding of the minds of people, and there's the surplus value extracted from war. War is one of the primary modes of the extraction of surplus labor value for the leviathan.

There is anti production at the heart of production, the state and police who shut down whatever alternative to the economic order there is, while at the same time extracting surplus labor value for the mega-machine, which only exists because it creates surplus value. Ultimately what is produced is the Lacanian notion of "lack." This is described as the small object a, the thing which prevents full enjoyment that also drives you to seek enjoyment at the same time. Capitalism tells you you are never satisfied, you need the next thing, you need to allocate your time, which is an internal clock that capitalism instills in you around capitalism. Capitalism is as Perlman calls, the world eater. With the knowledge and capital that is produced, there is an "equivalent flow of stupidity." The military, and the production of goods no one needs, are an "anti human enterprise." Perlman describes Zeks, worker slaves, as captured in a Leviathanic machine, D & G's mega-machine. D & G say money and the market are capitalism's true police, implying the police go where capital tells them to go. It is at the level of flows, not ideology that desire is regulated. D & G suggest that we are not schizophrenic enough, schizophrenia being the foreclosure on the name of the future in Lacanian psychoanalysis, which means that we rebel against the internalization of paternalism, through the superego. Deleuze says we have not even begun to see the "process of acceleration."
 

Bazinga

Well-Known Member
I am currently working my way through chapter 3, section 9 of Deleuze and Guattari's Anti Oedipus one of the central chapters of the book. They've been talking about how capitalism is a territorializing machine. The mega-machine is a large collector of petty debts, and it is the internalized superego, the policeman in your head which represents the move psychologically from Feudalism, which was defined solely by the state, to the mega-machine. The mega-machine is contrasted to technical machines, for instance, a clock, vs the global market which is Leviathanic in that it has tentacles for Perlman. But while Deleuze and Guattari do not use the same tentacle metaphor, they do talk about a sort of mega-machine which is independent of the technical machines - for instance a fork (technical machine) vs the justice system (the mega-machine). One might also remember Hobbes Leviathan. In this section, number 9.

Deleuze claims that capitalism is not the disillusion of Feudalism, that is why there was so much time in between. D & G take shot at Hegel saying the only universal history is contingency, and why European history? Why not Japanese, Chinese, Islamic, etc. The schizophrenic voyage is the only kind there is, implying that one is not territorialized as an identity like a nation implies a single, stable identity? Capitalism itself represents the decoding of flows, so it represents the capture of all the meaning into something very similar to Guy Debord's Spectacle. The spectacle is an image, which consumes everything around it - in this way the significance of all semiotics, signs and symbols, becomes sucked into a capitalist adjacent lifestyle, and implication. Everything has a price or reflects on the mega-machines deterritorialization of old ways of life, which is otherwise known as colonialism. Capitalism for Deleuze and Guattari, as they say in no uncertain terms in an earlier chapter, is colonialism.

Deleuze and Guattari take aim at humanism, saying that there's a god-capital, like Lugalzaggizi Optimus Maximus from Perlman's Against His-Story, Against Leviathan, the god of war which has been enshrined on the dollar. They say that humanism is cynicism and a strange piety. The strange piety is god-capital, and the cynicism is a means of extorting surplus labor. The very act of money begetting money, surplus value being extracted, is the beginning of the capitalism machine. The capitalism machine becomes "anus and vampire," saying much like Perlman that capitalism is dead labor, and sucks of the life from living labor, like the Leviathan sucks potentiality out of people and subordinates them to the mega-machine. It is anal, because the debt and creditor relation occurs early in childhood, with the giving and recieving of feces as is the beginning of the relation of giving and withholding. So in other words, capitalism codes everything through an anal drive, which holds or expels money, the equivalent of shit, and it is the Leviathan which is the arbiter of this vast array of invisible, mechanic flow of literal materials, and the implication of what possibilities are extended that shine forth through their semiotic code.

Deleuze and Guattari talk about how displacement is a core feature of capitalism. Keeping developing nations poor increases surplus value, Franz Fanon can attest to this. Investors would come to Africa and form a bourgeois class, and the poor of Africa would not actually see any benefits that the bourgeoisie said they would give them, instead the French government killed and harshly repressed the Africans. America felt Lumumba threatened US interests in Africa and that is why assassins were sent to kill him. Capitalism runs on "primitive accumulation" deterritorializing previous territories, in order to decode the flows into capital. That is why they keep attacking Palestinians, because they want land, capital. Capitalism turns code to flux, flows of code are on the interior and exterior of the machine, which form "elements of a technology, even a science." Machines do not create capitalism, capitalism creates machines. Unrealized surplus value creates unemployment and stagnation, as the machines inside of you depend on the mega-machine and its control of petty debts. There is "knowledge capital" the decoding of the minds of people, and there's the surplus value extracted from war. War is one of the primary modes of the extraction of surplus labor value for the leviathan.

There is anti production at the heart of production, the state and police who shut down whatever alternative to the economic order there is, while at the same time extracting surplus labor value for the mega-machine, which only exists because it creates surplus value. Ultimately what is produced is the Lacanian notion of "lack." This is described as the small object a, the thing which prevents full enjoyment that also drives you to seek enjoyment at the same time. Capitalism tells you you are never satisfied, you need the next thing, you need to allocate your time, which is an internal clock that capitalism instills in you around capitalism. Capitalism is as Perlman calls, the world eater. With the knowledge and capital that is produced, there is an "equivalent flow of stupidity." The military, and the production of goods no one needs, are an "anti human enterprise." Perlman describes Zeks, worker slaves, as captured in a Leviathanic machine, D & G's mega-machine. D & G say money and the market are capitalism's true police, implying the police go where capital tells them to go. It is at the level of flows, not ideology that desire is regulated. D & G suggest that we are not schizophrenic enough, schizophrenia being the foreclosure on the name of the future in Lacanian psychoanalysis, which means that we rebel against the internalization of paternalism, through the superego. Deleuze says we have not even begun to see the "process of acceleration."
Well written !! I disagree with most ot it. However, I thoroughly enjoyed it and am looking forward to more. Thanks for sharing.
 
Top Bottom