Should I choose the E-Nano or the SSV?

[Brachmanhuxley]

Hi, I recently posted asking about two other vaporizers, but I've been doing more research and one thing I know for sure is that I prefer a plug-in vaporizer.

After getting some useful opinions and reading about the pro's and con's of a lot of plug-in vaporizers, I am pretty sure that I'm going to choose one of this two vaporizers (E-Nano or SSV) as my first. However, if you think another one would suit me better, I'm open to any suggestions.

What I'm looking for:
- Size: not too big so I can take it with me to my friends homes.
- Efficiency: I'm not a heavy smoker during the week but I still would like to cut down the amount of herb I consume, so I would like to get a vaporizer which works fine and medicates well with smaller amounts of herb as well (I do have a moderate tolerance I guess).
- Taste: this is one of the main points. I'm pretty sure a glass wand will provide better taste than a silicon/plastic wand, right?
- Smooth vapor: When I smoke I easily get throat irritation. Even if vapor is more gentle on the throat and lungs, I would prefer a vaporizer that doesn't produce too harsh clouds.
- Durability
- Easy to use and easy to clean: I would prefer one where you don't need to stir the herb constantly to get the heat to reach evenly through the whole bowl. It would be nice too if it's easy to clean.

For the moment I plan on using it without water filtration but maybe in the future I'll change my mind, who knows lol

After what I've read and heard about both of them, I think the E-Nano suits me better, but there's something about the bigger clouds I think you get from the SSV that attracts me (probably because I'm used to smoking ).

Another important thing I didn't mention is that I live in Europe, where you can buy the SSV but not the E-nano. This is a big pro if I need to replace anything.

How's the taste from the SSV compared to that of the E-Nano?

Thank you

 

[M4k4v3l1]

I was stuck on the same question and now I've made up my mind to get the Nano, even got a piece of rosewood ready to send, as far as I've researched I think it's crazy good efficiency wise, and its small and really easy to use, I read that people had issues trying to teach their friends how to use the SSV.

I haven't used either myself but just researching about plug ins for a while here I'm pretty sold about the Nano, will ship the Rosewood piece as soon as I'm home, also I think the fact that the maker of that vape is constantly on here for questions and support is amazing, I plan on using it with my Helix Bubbler and Bong since I heard its amazing with glass.

 

[Delta3DStudios]

I've only got the E-Nano, and never used an SSV. So I'm not going to even try comparing the two because I would be a fanboy about it. But they are both quite popular around here.

Here are two things to think about
1) I believe the E-Nano is much smaller - Think the size of a small redbull can.
2) The Nano uses 110V - it's sold exclusively through www.epicvape.com (Well, not true, there is one LHS in the USA that carries the nano, but he's the only place in the world currently stocking it!)- You will need a power inverter to work with 220V. There are several options mentioned over on the Nano thread, but it is an added expense.

Personally, the Nano is perfect for me - cured any desire I have for bigger vapor clouds. That said, I do prefer using it with water filtration. I rarely vaporize dry anymore. The Nano and my Lotus have really spoiled me (as is the Cheap glass bubblers thread). I've got quite a handful of different glass ready to use with my Nano thanks to the cheap glass thread!

(Note, I purchased one nano, and loved it so much I bought a second nano with extremely custom exotic Afzelia Burl wood from @Snappo )

 

[Brachmanhuxley]

Thanks for your input @M4k4v3l1 and @Ratchett.

The Nano seems like a very good option, indeed. However, I'll wait to see what other people, especially those who have owned/tried both, have to say about the SSV and the Nano.

If the Nano was available in Europe I would clearly choose it, but since it's only available in the US I'm a bit worried about having issues if I need to replace anything...

 

[Gonzo]

Have not used an E Nano, but I own a couple other log vapes as well as an SSV. I personally think both are great options but the choice will come down to how you plan to use it. If you want to use a whip, go with the SSV. If you think you will prefer the direct draw more, go with the Nano. both will mate with water tools fairly easy, and as far as I know both can produce good quality vapor.

 

[Seren]

I've only ever tried the E-Nano (I love mine!), but I'd still like to share some thoughts with you. I also narrowed it down to these two before plumping for my beautiful log.

A very knowledgeable and well known member here advised me that the Nano can in some respects be considered a type of hybrid between the SSV and logs. Apparently, the heating element of the E-Nano performs similarly to that of the SSV, and is quite distinct from the other logs available. However, the Nano looks like and provides the same efficiency as the other logs. The E-Nano would therefore, in some peoples eyes, seem to offer the best of both worlds.

In terms of cleaning - the stems of the E-Nano are very easy to keep looking like new. I guess it's inherently more difficult to say the same of any whip delivery system. But saying that, it's also very easy to change the whip tubing after a while.

Both the E-Nano and SSV come with bags for carrying them around to your mates. If you do need a step down converter - that will add more weight and bulk to the E-Nano load. How that compares to the SSV weight etc - I'm not sure. Both units can be left on all day, and both have a lot of happy fans.

The taste and quality of the vapour produced by the E-Nano is superb. For me, that and the organic feel of the wood are what makes the Nano stand out above the SSV - but that is just a personal preference - one you may very well not share.

Anyway - good luck in deciding. I don't think you can go far wrong with either.

 

[M4k4v3l1]

(Note, I purchased one nano, and loved it so much I bought a second nano with extremely custom exotic Afzelia Burl wood from @Snappo )

God damn I didn't know that fella was selling such exotic wood planks, puts the Rosewood I picked up to shame, and he ships em to Epicvape personally too which makes my life easier, I think I found another solid reason for the Nano to be my first plug in vape! Being a part time wood worker myself I can imagine getting high and then doing small carvings all over my piece, there's another reason I would take this over the SSV, decorative wise it looks so damn nicer imo, and I can already imagine what I wanna draw on it!

I've only ever tried the E-Nano (I love mine!), but I'd still like to share some thoughts with you. I also narrowed it down to these two before plumping for my beautiful log.

The taste and quality of the vapour produced by the E-Nano is superb. For me, that and the organic feel of the wood are what makes the Nano stand out above the SSV - but that is just a personal preference - one you may very well not share.

Anyway - good luck in deciding. I don't think you can go far wrong with either.

Hope we get some people here who've tried both to comment on the difference between taste quality of the two, I'm also curious to know now, although because of the beautiful wood and smaller size and efficiency and all im 100% certain ill stick with the Nano, but I get OPs point about the problems it could have living in EU and needing maintenance and a converter and such.

 

[Seren]

I get OPs point about the problems it could have living in EU and needing maintenance and a converter and such.

I understand the concern too - I live in the UK. I'm pleased to say I haven't experienced any problems with my E-Nano. I'm also pretty sure of the fact that if there were a problem Andy would provide nothing but excellent follow-up care - as he has done with the unfortunate few who have had to send theirs back. The step-down is not really an issue, just a small extra cost - IMO.

 

[Gonzo]

One thing I will add is that if you currently use concentrates or plan to use them in the future the SSV would take a step ahead IMO. I use concentrates with my log vapes but IMO the oil kit for the SSV is awesome! It has permanently replaced my torch and nail because it can always be left on and is ready to go hit after hit without reheating the nail.

 

[Gonzo]

The SSV like the other 7th Floor products can be very efficient or not efficient at all. The different wand sizes allow for many differs load sizes. I personally use the GG wand with a vapexhale ELB and oil kit heater cover. This allows me to leave the oil kit cover on but choose between vaping bud or concentrates.

My usual load size in the ELB is .10-.12

 

[hoptimum]

How is the efficiency of the SSV herb wise?

It's not as efficient at conserving herb due to a larger bowl, but I think the flavor is comparable, and the hits can be massive and unrestricted. I have a different log (HI), and I like alternating between them

 

[biohacker]

Wouldn't the LSV be the better comparable?

 

[Gonzo]

More of an aesthetic difference IMO. I used to own a LSV as well but sold it before getting my Cloud. I do like the glass air path of the LSV and the ability to easily pass it around with a group of friends but prefer the SSV because of the oil kit option. Once again. it depends on how the OP plans to mostly use the vape.

I am a big fan of log vapes (I own 3 Underdogs, 1 CRZ, and have owned a HI and Woodeez as well) but the logs do have their disadvantages. I never use my logs with friends mainly because I would have to reload too often.

If the OP vapes mostly alone and conserving is a priority then the log wins IMO. If using with friends and wants the option of loading more but still being conservative when alone, then my vote would go to a 7th Floor product.

 

[Toastface_Killah]

SSV is a reliable heavy hitter, huge cloud maker, weed eater and tank of a vaporizer. Nano is a super efficient heavy hitter and cloud maker, just not as hardcore/heavy as the SSV.

For years I thought only the SSV could satisfy my needs for something heavy hitting, but I always disliked how it was too easy to eat up my stash. When I found the Nano, I quickly realized how wrong I had been going about things for the past couple years. I always found ( at least with my SSV wand) that it was impossible to pack in tiny loads and get a satisfying single large hit, which always leads to more being packed in. That doesn't happen with the Nano as I can put in a tiny amount, change the screen location and still pull a chunky cloud out of it.

Now, the only time I pull out the SSV is if i'm oddly in a mood where I do not care about efficiency and just want to rip massive clouds (which is very rare, as I can still get the chunky clouds I crave from the tiny mighty Nano), or my friends are around and theres no time to take turns with the Nano.

 

[hoptimum]

SSV is a reliable heavy hitter, huge cloud maker, weed eater and tank of a vaporizer. Nano is a super efficient heavy hitter and cloud maker, just not as hardcore/heavy as the SSV.

For years I thought only the SSV could satisfy my needs for something heavy hitting, but I always disliked how it was too easy to eat up my stash. When I found the Nano, I quickly realized how wrong I had been going about things for the past couple years. I always found ( at least with my SSV wand) that it was impossible to pack in tiny loads and get a satisfying single large hit, which always leads to more being packed in. That doesn't happen with the Nano as I can put in a tiny amount, change the screen location and still pull a chunky cloud out of it.

Now, the only time I pull out the SSV is if i'm oddly in a mood where I do not care about efficiency and just want to rip massive clouds (which is very rare, as I can still get the chunky clouds I crave from the tiny mighty Nano), or my friends are around and theres no time to take turns with the Nano.

you can limit the amount you use in the bowl with a Vapor Brothers mini whip for the standard heater cover, or by using an EQ elbow screen in the GG heater cover

 

[Brachmanhuxley]

Thanks for all your replies.

I intend to use it with friends as well as alone but even in the first setting I think it's going to be me who uses it most of the time as they are very used to smoking and are not so impressed with the vaping idea. But who knows maybe when they try they'll change their minds

I'm very interested in efficiency so I'll probably get the Nano as some of you also said you get very good hits out of it. I hope I won't crave bigger clouds too much

Just out of curiosity @Gonzo, how many loads of that size do you need to feel a decent effect?

Peace

 

[lwien]

I always found ( at least with my SSV wand) that it was impossible to pack in tiny loads and get a satisfying single large hit.....

This hasn't been true with my LSV. Is there a big difference in bowl size between the LSV wand and the SSV wand?

 

[Toastface_Killah]

This hasn't been true with my LSV. Is there a big difference in bowl size between the LSV wand and the SSV wand?

I had a custom spherical ground glass wand with mine for stock, and it just had a very deep chamber compared to my friends stock one. Even still, I've used the stock wands of a friends numerous times and, while there was a difference, it still did not vape the small loads like a Nano will. I also never purchased a standard heater cover to work with the Vapor Bros mini wand.

 

[Gonzo]

@Brachmanhuxley

.10 definitely gets me going in the right direction but usually two is my average. Depending on the amount of time I have, I will sometimes load up about .20 just to get get the job done in one quick session. I like the option of being able to do that.

If efficiency is your main concern and you will only share with friends on occasion, I would probably recommend the log. Like I said I have never tried an ENano but i love my Underdogs and CRZ, and I have read great things about the ENano.

 

[al bundy]

If you get the Nano just get extra stems that way everyone gets a stem and you pass the lNano around.

 

[Mr. Gweilo 420]

The Enano can supply massive clouds if thats what you like or it can provide wonderful flavor. It has a lot of power in reserve and can really vape concentrates well also.

 

[exit]

I actually have my nano and ssv running next to each other.
The nano gets almost all of my use. I love it.

The only time I use the SSV really these days is when i want to pack a giant load into a stem and vape a ton of weed at once.

They're both great vapes and you will enjoy either one. I personally think they complement each other quitenicely.

 

[max]

how many loads of that size do you need to feel a decent effect?

Your question is 100% subjective. Personally, I need considerably less than that size of a load for a decent effect. Judging how much you need by how much someone else needs is a waste of time, since everyone is different. And after that 'base difference', you have to account for tolerance difference.

I personally think they complement each other quitenicely.

The SSV and a log vape have been paired up many, many times.

 

[Brachmanhuxley]

Your question is 100% subjective. Personally, I need considerably less than that size of a load for a decent effect. Judging how much you need by how much someone else needs is a waste of time, since everyone is different. And after that 'base difference', you have to account for tolerance difference.

I wasn't judging how much I will need, it was mere curiosity to know if he needs to reload it very often.

 

[Brachmanhuxley]

Tried to edit my last message but I can't find the Edit option so I'll ask here.

Which accessories would you recommend buying? I was thinking about getting a Glass Adjust-A-Bowl E-Nano Stem, but is there something else I should also get?

For the moment I won't get the GonG as I want to try the Nano by itself first and then later on maybe I'll get a minibong, but not yet.