Rios Montt, Guatemala...Is Allan Nairn a Commie? Yeah, I didn't think so either!

VWFringe

Naruto Fan
I have ADHD, and tend to use anger and superiority to access my dopamine reward system, so take what I write with a grain of salt (and know that I do too)....






Rios Montt was convicted of genocide last Friday. I saw a news report on channel seven - I've been clean and sober of Corporate Programming, but my ex-wife was watching the nightly news while I was cooking my sprouted lentils and tofu. I commented, "they left out the fact that our government put him in power," without realty knowing. She did NOT like that comment. I asked her when the last time she heard a news report about the Koch brothers, and she didn't know who they are (but she's probably heard their Heritage Foundation or Kato Institute used to support news reports), and I asked if she thought it was right the rich can buy their invisibility from the news while still manipulating our opinions, to which she began to yell I should shut the fuck up, and that was the last time she buys me food (to which I said, yeah, kill the messenger, that three buck bag of spinach was totally worth being yelled fuck at).

So, I bookmarked that story mentally, and Democracy Now covered it extensively, and I believe I've made a further connection I'd like to share with you all....


Allan Nairn reported from Guatemala in 1982 and was there for the trial. He said at one point on Democracy Now, this Monday:
foreign companies, when they come into a country and are looking to invest, they want some laws to be enforced, like the laws on contracts, and they want other laws not to be enforced, like the labor laws and the laws which stop them from murdering their employees if they try to organize unions. In the ’80s, the leaders of the American Chamber of Commerce described to me how they would sometimes turn over names of troublesome workers to the security forces, and they would then disappear or be assassinated. Fred Sherwood was one of the Chamber of Commerce leaders who described that. And now, with this verdict, it seems that Pérez Molina and the corporate leaders and the elites in Guatemala, in general, are worried that they may have a harder time killing off workers and organizers when they need to.
These statements jibed with the quotes of Rios Montt, who was taught perhaps by our advisors, not to look at the indigenous People as Mayan Indians needing to be exterminated, but as communist rebels who are bad for business.

Now, oddly, perhaps, the connection that came to my mind, is of the phrase, "regional stability," when used to justify the CIA over-throw of democratically elected leaders, and the new learning I obtained from watching economist Richard Wolff speak so eloquently about giving Democracy a chance to replace Capitalism in the USA. He said that before the "New Deal" was struck in our country, that the labor unions, and the Socialist and Communist Parties in America were VERY powerful during the Great Depression, and that many here in America were dissatisfied with the 25% unemployment at the time, and, that the president knew that we were on the verge of electing a different set of players into government that would be willing to move the country in a different direction (and commented this was not taught as a part of our history for some reason). That in itself was something of a revelation to me, but I did not doubt what Richard Wolff said because I know he was taught at the top schools here, and knows a lot about how things work in other parts of the world as well (and I had been exposed to the idea that the banks actually precipitated the fall of the stock markets to gain control of, and privatize, our monetary system, which we now know as the Federal Reserve (which is a bank owned company from which our government has to borrow from for each printing of money, and pay interest for, each time) in the film. "Thrive."
And, so, the McCarthy-ism here was not, perhaps a fear of Russia taking over our country, but actuallty a quashing of internal forces. And, so, the statement, "regional stability," is perhaps not a fear of the spreading of communism, but a fear that American's will remember their history, and think again of trying something different, as Capitalism here hasn't just experienced the Great Depression, and the Economic Collapse of 2008...but has experienced 55 other periods of instability or corrections, or whatever you want to call them. I myself have lived through several during which my (low) wages have been frozen for a couple of years each (remember, I have ADHD, and so have worked most of my life in low wage jobs, not having been diagnosed until a year or so ago after being kicked out of high school for exactly the type of behaviors now readily associated with ADHD, or understanding what it takes to concentrate and be able to read books). So, to my mind, now, the statement and justification, "Regional Stability," really, truelly, means, "Thought Control," or preventing the American (USA) People from imagining any other way of doing things than letting big business do whatever the hell it wants, and allowing them to make big bucks selling guns and stuff to our military, and allowing certain government agencies to get un-holy powerful, killing by proxy un-told hundreds of thousands of People in South America (and other parts of the world, like Vietnam to name one huge example) in the process, but making it seem completely different in the nightly news.

One element of the fall-out of this process is that when you massacre the People in a village, or provide the guns and ammo and military intelligence for the rich in those countries to do that, there are People who become displaced and have to flee their country.

But, the rich here have developed a line of reasoning for that also, and so we bottom feeders who have decided to trust the explanations of the rich, and watch the nightly news, or Corporate Programming, have been taught to call those People "*Illegal Aliens." Which is pretty fucked up, if you ask me. And, now, after allowing the rich to phrase things for so long, we have a LOT of true believers, who have been taught to see things as they are NOT.

Go figger'

* Harvest of Empire is a book and now a movie explaining how each action the US government has taken in South American counties has resulted in refugees who had to move, and wound up here in the U.S. It is co-authored by journalist Juan Gonzales, who reports on Democracy Now sometimes (he's the one with visible dopamine access, the heart of the show, IMHO).
 
VWFringe,

Armerad

Dabbin'
It is an interesting point that you bring up, the displaced persons from impoverished countries (displaced due to covert and dubious CIA operations) come to America, only to be exploited as a new source of cheap labor while also being demonized by their employer as "different".
I generally try to avoid conspiracy theories, but that's pretty shadowy.
 
Armerad,

VWFringe

Naruto Fan
It has been said that immigration to the United States was encouraged in the past to bring down labor wages, and has been said more recently that a certain amount of unemployment is necessary to keep labor wages from climbing too high. Those ideas are not seen as conspiracy theories.

I guess I don't know why mine would be (conspiracy theories)..."stability in the region," or "preventing communism from taking a foot-hold in our hemisphere" aren't, but I don't think anyone in our government or our military really imagined they'd climb the walls and invade us, so that leaves the idea that we'd get the idea, and change things from inside, if we thought they were doing a better job of taking care of everyone than we are...so, again, using killing to control what we think is just looking at the result if not the intent.

Our government's interventions in other governments, to this day, are well documented, if not officially admitted. They fall into the category of opinions, rather than conspiracy theories, IMHO....as do the things I have written. But, I tend to look to the end effect, or results, as I am also looking for solutions.

But, first and foremost in my mind is the certainty that I used to think I am smart...until I realized I haven't read books, other than sci-fi and horror books occasionally, for the past eighteen years, so now I know I am not smart (bright perhaps, not smart). But, I also "choose to believe" that living in the TV Universe (borrowing from the terms Marvel or DC Universe), led me to certain beliefs, and knowing that "talking points" are used in our television news, and that high paid political analysts and Modern PR are both used in formulating those talking points, and the news, leads me to believe they know exactly where they've led me, and understand that many are limited to watching the TV news. Many of us, those with ADHD, share a learning disability, and believe the news is ubiquitous (news is the news is the news, don't matter who tells the story, they can't lie on TV)...but the number of People who refuse to listen to the news on TV is growing, when I worked in LA during December eight out of ten People I had deep conversations with already knew what I have come to believe: The TV news is not a valid source of news because of the spin. Some were Latin, one was Black (though two other Blacks thought I was funny and had no idea who Michelle Alexander was or what the Mass Incarceration of the United States meant - they're probably still watching TV news), and a couple had even read "Appology of An Economic Hit Man." Others I've met who've stopped watching television news are Iraq and Afganistan soldiers who returned, and saw how things are grossly mis-reported, and who believed they were helping spread democracy, but now understand that's not what's happening, and was never the intention. The truth is out there and it isn't hard to find, but connecting the dots according to logic instead of propaganda takes some time. So, I find myself making inflammatory statements in my head, and as soon as I am homeless, will probably be making them to nobody from street corners, like, "our government is prevented by law from using psy-ops within our borders, but that doesn't stop corporations from doing it, and our government from camping on, and feeding them talking points."

I feel more engaged in our news now than before, I feel more connected to People around the world now than before, and whenever I catch a couple of minutes of corporate sponsored TV news now -- I know more about the stories than what they are saying, and can tell the spin from the truth more now than before. My emotional reactions are deeper now than before, my sense of when, where and how I am getting my dopamine is more acute now than before. I still have ADHD, and the problems with concentration and impulse control, but I know about it now more than before, and have hope of getting better more now than before (when I didn't even know it existed, or thought it wasn't really a factor in People's lives).

Our culture lies to us because it is so manipulated by the rich, and TV news is really where rich white men teach us how they want *us to think about things...In my humble opinion (I'm an asshole with an opinion).

EDIT: * TV news is where rich white men teach us how they want "us" to think about things (not how they think about them, just how they want us to).
 
VWFringe,
Top Bottom