I'm still concerned about images longevity. On imgur we had the insurance that they would not delete pics. On other sites it's not that clear.
I share that as well. I tend to post technical photos and go to some considerable effort to describe what's going on, often the same basic information and photos for a number of reasons.
Unlike what ImageShack did to us a while back, the reason I changed to Imgur, those photos are still available for those who really what to see them. I will take Stu's suggestion going forward and post the link instead of the 'BBCode' version to make it easier (guys won't have to use the 'reply' trick) but balk at those who beg/demand I change for their convenience. Sorry about that. Yes, I'm a bit upset that a couple years posts are now useless in large part since the photo is lost forever with ImageShack. I'd have to guess what was there, post by post, to try to recover that from my camera.
Imgur gets a separate request any time anyone looks at a page (25 posts) so that photo loads whether needed or not. I can understand their reluctance to pay for such service, IMO we have screwed ourselves by being so popular?
Perhaps I'll change and 'start all over again' for a third time, but for now I'm with Stu and KZ (who is wise in so many ways....), there's a 'work around' for those interested.
OF