DeadShort, I bought a #5 Torx (Standard, not Safety) but it's too big. Maybe a #4?
Wow, it took like 4 days, but I managed to read every post in this 178-page thread. I'm officially sold on the Pax and will be ordering mine tonight from VapeBot (I couldn't resist a free bag for carrying it around) in Amethyst. I'll report back when I receive it. Wish me luck.
I have found that I like to pack the oven 1/3 full. Then stir after only a couple of hits. There's that initial shrinking of the load away from the oven walls, so I stir to re-pack. After that the clouds cometh.
80% of my sessions are at low
I have found that I like to pack the oven 1/3 full. Then stir after only a couple of hits. There's that initial shrinking of the load away from the oven walls, so I stir to re-pack. After that the clouds cometh.
80% of my sessions are at low
I have always used my Pax on low and only some times on medium. I found that I get great clouds but then again I stir about every 8 or 9 hits. The stuff I get is mid grade at best.
I have found that I like to pack the oven 1/3 full. Then stir after only a couple of hits. There's that initial shrinking of the load away from the oven walls, so I stir to re-pack. After that the clouds cometh.
I too also like to pack the bowl 1/3 full for myself, but it only lasts about 6 hits then its cashed.
80% of my sessions are at low
I thought the PAX didn't give good results with less than a full packed bowl.
I thought the PAX didn't give good results with less than a full packed bowl.
There isn't a right or wrong way to pack the Pax, just personal preference.
I've tried all sorts of variations by now, and I agree with this. The effects vary depending on how you load the oven, but they all work. I can throw in a pinch that barely covers the oven floor, not do any packing and still get decent vapour. If it's not packed you can shake it; in fact you have to if you want get all the vapour.
Well you're new enough that you get a pass. I'm taking that as a joke. darkrom, on the other hand, has been around a long time and should know better than to drop into a thread and demand a summary.
Again wasn't demanding a summary. I know the summary from all my reading. I'm asking for some negative reviews which luckily are buried in the many many positive reviews. My reading this thread is why I am here asking for more specific information on the negatives.
It's like reading the cloud thread looking for negatives...hard to find buried in with endless glowing reviews.
I don't think its unreasonable to ask about the rarely talked about negatives to this vape since I already did my research on how to use it, watched plenty of vids, read the thread, and know all the very apparent positives. Unless this is the holy grail of vapes with NO downsides, I still think it is a fair question.
I'm not being lazy, I'm asking for more specific and focused input on the cons.
im done with this pax
this is crazy.. 250 and u use it a few times and it doesnt function how its supposed to unless u start cleaning. i been cleaning this after every use cuz it gets stuck
i cant recommend this to anyone, pax has been a headache.. damn!
Thanks, i was under the impression, from reading the thread, that the PAX was not such a very good experience with a low packed bowl. Although the process of vaporization went as it should, of course.
The key word here is experience. That means it's subjective. The packed bowl idea comes directly from Ploom, who recommend it right in the owner's guide, so that's how most people start out. A full tightly packed oven definitely will get you nice vapour at any temperature setting, so the idea arose that you must pack the oven tightly. Rebels, like me, decided to try other loading techniques and discovered that they worked too, sometimes better than the recommended method depending on your preferences.
As an experiment, after I wrote that last post I dumped just enough into my Pax to cover the oven floor. The vapour I got at yellow was thin but tasty, just what I like. If I had kept using this in my normal manner, I'd have taken two or three hots and turned it off. That would guarantee that the taste would be gone when I turned it on again, and I'd get no more than half the hits I could with the same amount in the MFLB, most of which would also taste better.
This time I used it more like combustion, hitting it repeatedly with only short pauses. The taste lasts a little longer this way and I got about 75% as many hits as I would have gotten from the LB. When the taste started to go off I stepped up to orange for three or four hits then on to red. The vapour got a little thicker and less tasty but it kept coming, until the taste got too nasty for me. Here's what the ABV looks like:
That's all that was left, and it worked quite nicely.
That is great pakalolo, thanks for taking the time. I really had the impression all around about the efficiency in this vaporizer. It seems the process is quicker than the mflb, perhaps to a bit of more convection going on?