alright i got my "review"
the unit, is great. after researching the battery size, the element design, heating methods. and owning both usits, the pax by ploom and the vape blunt 2.0 (awsome unit in its own rights) with the one you have showy waste of money, they made an effort. it also doubles as a very simple design that wont fail in to many spots. 10 year warrenty BOOM. easy money. charge a premium for the nice warrenty.
the VP. you have a very nice thought through design, you have a cheaped out manufacturing process. parts could of been chosen better, less generic design. better strurider wires going into heating elemtnts, far to thin to even support multible 100 clean downs. i got mine apart and together but i woudln't advice doing it again!! super thin wire. tight spacing, cheap plastic. little protection, BUT ENOUGH. your putting fire in your hand no matter how you shake it with both units.
the battery, easily repalcable + on the VP 2.0, not eaisly done, but not needed with 10 year warrent, even bunch for punch. so their both gonna last roughly as long.
cooking, their both pretty much metal conduction into an oven. the VP a more conventinal top hat screen. very easily filled, the pax the same, although hard to clean on the pax and prown with tight corners, not the case with the cone ont he VP. 1 button on each unit total, each unit goes about it completly differently. the pax only uses it for heat control.the VP uses it for the power button and heat settings. pax is far easier.
using with the buddys. your gonna find their both impractical, as the vapor still needss a moment to build up "cook" i think of it as. so, not good in the pass around the buss. but good for 2-3 buddys ont he couch. great in fact. the VP, has its draw backs, better flow. full heat seems to do a better job keeping the vapor flowing, but still with oven size far to small. but plenty big for 1 -3 peple again if wanted but quite as far as the pax for length.
the VP has the design for the stoner award in my book. easy feed, easy build in stir stick. the quality seems poor in both deparments but with the wear around the areas they seem sufficiant, but nothing worth my penny for sure. not the feel anyways. perhaps to much $ in design, not enough in production, the pax much the same the opisite, as its practical uses are limited, where as the VP can expand, add a water unit which is VERY nice. very massive plus. if the unit could last longh to be worth the 150$ I don't know my self. ima wait a few months on that purchase myself. see if the unit can last long enough to warrent a glass pieace that expensive that can only use this unit.
features and design all on the VP
lacking in the follow through with quality but does the job well. seems "worth" it.
the pax, great follow through on wuality. could of had more practicality, but also with its smaller size (smaller batter) its more efficiant heating and smarter heating lower temps gives it only slightly shorter life span than the VP. which seems wasteful IMO but ive yet to kill mine, can't ocmpare life. life on pax is about 45 mins. pretty firm on that on red. probobly not so firm with yellow and orange settings.
so. their ya have it. i smoke entirly to much vapor, and my unit turned off while i wrote this. I need to go fill up!
my esatimated production cost for both units is likley very similer for each unit. maybe more in fact for the VP. i got mine for 170$ because im a cheap fuck. XD
I like the pax for taste on red yellow and orange. the VP seems fast, but little suface are and smaller oven affect that too, also the cloud size. a slightly longer wait between the two. depeneds how its filled, how hot is and how long it sbeen on, what your ocoking how much it has how dry it is. so both units vary, i dont have any kind of references.