I am currently running a ghost mv1 stealth and a dynavap "M" 2019. I am shocked at the small amount of flower these units use, and how nicely they vape product, especially the dynavap "M" using an induction heater my avb is perfect everytime, The effects are fantastic. Now I have to ask what device is more efficient, using the least amount of flower but still get you medicated?
Most efficient vape?
- Thread starter david8613
- Start date
pxl_jockey
Just a dude
I’d say you should get a plug-in vape, it’s more power and you’ll experience even more efficiency. There are lots of options in this category but the first type that came to mind was a log vape. There are 4-5 brands here and they all seem to share the same basic tech and they’re all very efficient, producing clouds and effects with just a few crumbs of your herb. Definitely worth looking into imo, and can’t imagine that you would be disappointed.
A log like a Woodscents and/or a Enano would be my suggestion as those are the two I have.
Both are very efficient direct-draw beasts - I like the glass stems for the Nano and pretty much only use VapCaps (minus the cap) with the WS. Of course, you can use them with water pipes and I like to pair the Nano to a smaller sized bubbler for even bigger hits but even then, I prefer anhydrous glass (dry/no water) to preserve flavours and hopefully more of the goodies inside me and not floating in water. All this is only my opinion and YMMV. 
A log like a Woodscents and/or a Enano would be my suggestion as those are the two I have.
Both are very efficient direct-draw beasts - I like the glass stems for the Nano and pretty much only use VapCaps (minus the cap) with the WS. Of course, you can use them with water pipes and I like to pair the Nano to a smaller sized bubbler for even bigger hits but even then, I prefer anhydrous glass (dry/no water) to preserve flavours and hopefully more of the goodies inside me and not floating in water. All this is only my opinion and YMMV. That is a good idea! I remember the first time I vaped flower my friend had an old school wooden box gadget with a long tube coming out of it. it was from a company called vapor brothers, he had the original from 1999! He still uses it, It still works! When I first drew on it, I did not think it was doing anything, very light vapor, it was too smooth, 20 mins later I was feeling it big time! I might have to look into desktop.
Last edited:
shredder
Well-Known Member
I'm surprised you site a dynavap for being consistent. I have a handful but use a dv tip mostly with a @DDave water wand.
I like it and it's probably efficient, but its not consistent bowl after bowl, even with a induction heater, than say a mighty, or even a log. Not even close really. Imo anyway.
Last edited:
Ramahs
Fucking Combustion (mostly) Since February 2017
Hmmm...I get extremely consistent results with my Dynavap vaporizers and a torch.
It would be certainly one that I would name as more consistent and efficient (once you get your preferred technique down). In fact, I get more consistent hits and roasts with a single-flame torch with my Dynavap vapes than I do when using an induction heater.
However, I still use my induction heater when speed and convenience are more important than consistent and perfect extractions. But the IH just doesn't rival the controlled and even roast I can get with a precise single-flame torch. I have tripple and quad-flame torches, but they are more like the brute-force, simplicity, and speed of the induction heater...but lack the ability to get a perfect and even roast like I can get with a precise single-flame torch.
CalyxSmokr
Well-Known Member
log by a mile. if you are a super cloud chaser then maybe not best choice but for sure most efficient. It is more than enough hit size for me but biggest hit takers complain.
jeffp
psychonaut/retired
I haven't used my vapor brothers in a long time but it's a very good, perhaps an excellent vaporizer. By the way the lightness or heaviness of the vapor is largely determined by the temperature level it's set at as well as the force of your inhale. It also has something to do with the potency of the herb. Also, the unit needs to be warmed up a good 15 minutes for monster hit results. Speaking of monster hits, the Silver Surfer bests the vapor brothers (in my opinion) significantly and that might be a good direction for you. I prefer the spherical model (non hands free) for control and management of the hits.
stinkytofus
Well-Known Member
Sticky brick jr is pretty good, .05, good hits, cloudy, easy to clean
flammy
Well-Known Member
I think any log will most likely be extremely efficient. They can also produce clouds with the proper technique and setup. I have both a UD and WS and love them both.
Desktops are generally more efficient than portables. All of my desktops are efficient except for the Canos. That said, I find my EVO and SSV to be very efficient as well.
Desktops are generally more efficient than portables. All of my desktops are efficient except for the Canos. That said, I find my EVO and SSV to be very efficient as well.
stinkytofus
Well-Known Member
U have ghost mv1 and dyna, you good for portables imo, get a good desktop or two and u set!
Ramahs
Fucking Combustion (mostly) Since February 2017
Yesssiiirrr it is! I love mine. But many aren't willing to spend the time developing a technique.
olivianewtonjohn
Well-Known Member
Arizer solo (with screen to make it half bowl) and e-nano. I strongly dislike inefficient vaporizers, buying a solo as my first vap I think I was spoiled. My dynavap is efficient but not quite as much as my solo