So after a few days of 5+ sessions per day, I have a few thoughts on the QC Teflon.
The build quality of the device is high. It really feels like a premium device when holding it. I've been pairing it through a mini bubbler using the basket/rimmed screen/flexicone tube module and the Hermes 14mm glass adapter.
The taste is really immense and seems to hold for at least a dozen lungfuls (using a loosely-packed large basket). The teflon core does a nice job of 'milking' the herbs into the bubbler with each long, slow draw (approx 7 seconds). Large basket sessions seem to last at least 10 minutes, and that's starting at red. I have no idea how long a large basket would last if I started on blue and stepped my way up. Too long for my needs, that's for sure.
I've been using the power puck for the most part, so I can't really comment on how many sessions I can get out of a full charge.
I certainly won't be needing all the accessories I ordered, and in hindsight I wouldn't have bought extra flexicones or small baskets, but rather extra flexicone whips and extra large baskets. Maybe even an extra 14 mm glass adapter as a spare just in case.. I don't think I'll be using the silicone delta3d 14mm adapters because the Hermes flexicone whip and glass adapter work so well with my mini bubbler. As for the 18mm Delrin I have coming from stickstones, I'll need to buy a bigger glass piece in the new year before I can test out that adapter. I also really like my current mini bubbler, which is also really chunky and well-made for a little guy, so I'm not in a rush to upgrade my glass just yet.
Now for my gripe, and it's a big one.
The sessions last far too long for my needs, even starting on red, and at the end of a 15 minute large basket session, I'm still not feeling particularly medicated.
Sure, the flavor is tremendous throughout the session, but flavor for flavor's sake is not why I vaporize my herbs. I vape instead of combusting for health reasons, but I expect to feel medicated as part of the process. The super flavor should be an added bonus of the experience, not the primary requirement. Flavor should (again, only for my needs) be secondary to medicating efficiency.
If I could take two large baskets back-to-back, I would. But that's too much vapor over 20-25 minutes for my throat/lungs to handle.
I feel I have a few choices:
- Stick with the teflon core for another week and see if the medicating properties improve as I adjust to this new vape signature.
- Order a decarb ring immediately and when it arrives, swap out the teflon cylinder for the decarb.
- Contact Patricia and see if I can return my QC teflon core and switch it for a QC glass core.
It has to be said that my MV functions 'flawlessly'. It heats up pretty quickly (I let it heat-soak for a minute or two longer than when the flashing stops), it produces HUGE clouds and immense flavor for what can seem like an eternity (when using a bubbler), it has a superior build quality, is both cordless and can be used with mains power.
Everything else about the MV is exactly as I had hoped it would be, but the huge flavorful clouds don't seem to get me medicated, and my lungs/throat can't take the 30+ lungfuls I might require in order to feel medicated in one sitting. I take 10 minute breaks between 2 large baskets, but that takes the the best part of an hour for a session.
How can it be that a device which produces such thick clouds does not get me as medicated as even an original Pax did? Does it have to do with the pure convection properties of the device? Does conduction really impart the couch-lock feeling to a vape signature?
EDIT:
I should add that my abv comes out a nice, even dark color, so there is definitely plenty of extraction happening.
I am extremely interested in the side-by-side reviews of those few who bought both the teflon and glass QCs. If there is a trade-off to be had where 50% of the flavor is lost during the session, but 25-50% medicating properties are added by using the glass core instead of the teflon, I have certainly bought the wrong core for my needs. How much does the decarb ring mimic the properties of the glass core, if there is indeed a noticeable difference between the two cores?