I'm kinda with you on that. I know that there's a LOT of love here for it and there are those that recommend it as a primary vape above all others, but I just don't see it. I had one of their first ones that they brought to market and I looked at it as little, stealthy "dugout"........nothing more. For a portable, I guess it's ok, but I would NEVER trade in my LSV or MiniVap for it. I have a hard time wrapping my head around a VapCap being a bong-like vape. Like jumbo shrimp, it's kind of an oxymoron.
I'm rather with you guys. I have VapCaps and love them, really do love them...particularly my OGs.
BUT, I think a bit of disservice is being done to inquiring members when the vC is almost always tossed out as the one-size fits all, nut for ever bolt, solution.
It is simply not to my mind and I not only love my OGs, I really deeply admire and respect George, Matt and the rest of the Dyna team for their outreach, their CS, and their dedication to bringing a really wonderfully functioning butane vape to the market.
I have had early models and I have the lastest Ti tip. Yes, improvements have been made, this is one of the things I so admire about them, the continuing improvement program they run. But improvements still don't make it a one answer solution for every vape purchase inquiry.
Its seems to me lately that no matter what the OPs criteria are, no matter how these criteria may exclude the VC, there will be a bunch of people recommending it. I don't get it. The VC certainly has a place in my line up, but if I was limited to one vape and one vape only, it would not be the VC. That's just me, you may be well different.
As far as the VC being bong like or not...wow, not really a relevant question to me. The VC does, however, extract wonderfully and completely in a couple of draws and runs outstanding with very small loads. The VC really does have some extremely desirable characteristics, but not the answer to all inquiries IMO.
Cheers