Looking for new vaporizer (~$200)

Status
Not open for further replies.

1337Dude

Well-Known Member
Currently, I have Da Buddah Vaporizer. I like it but I've had it for a long time and I know there are better vaporizers out there now for the money.

I've been looking at the EpicVape and it looks ideal. It's claiming to be efficient, has glass airway, heats up fast, and is pretty much at the amount of money I want to spend. But I would like compatibility with my bong because I often like to vaporize through my bong and I'm not sure how I can accommodate that.

Has anyone here used the EpicVape and can compare it to other vaporizers in the price range? If there's something that is more economical and/or offers a better vape experience, I'd like to know.

Thank you guys
 

KidFated.

Unknown Member
Currently, I have Da Buddah Vaporizer. I like it but I've had it for a long time and I know there are better vaporizers out there now for the money.

I've been looking at the EpicVape and it looks ideal. It's claiming to be efficient, has glass airway, heats up fast, and is pretty much at the amount of money I want to spend. But I would like compatibility with my bong because I often like to vaporize through my bong and I'm not sure how I can accommodate that.

Has anyone here used the EpicVape and can compare it to other vaporizers in the price range? If there's something that is more economical and/or offers a better vape experience, I'd like to know.

Thank you guys
The enano by epicvape is a very nice vaporizer, but i slightly like the Underdog more. More stem options and with a vvps more fine tuned temp settings. Both are great vaporizers, both a great with water tools, and both have awesome customer service. Research them both and decide what's best for you!

I would also suggest looking into some portables, they are getting better and better.

Have you tried using the LSV (lifesaber vaporizer) wand with your dbv? That was my favorite way to use it..

Good luck and read lots before you decide!
 

CarolKing

Singer of songs and a vapor connoisseur
The Enano from Epicbape is an awesome vaporizer and many enjoy water tools with that unit. They come in several beautiful wood pieces. It doesn't use as much herb as my Solo and the Solo doesn't use that much. It produces really great vapor flavor and medicates with little herb.
I just recently bought 2 nanos, a very nice choice if that is what you decide on.


You may want to look at a portable because you already have a desktop. Why not check into the Arizer Air or the Solo? They have the glass air path like the Enano.

The Solo is larger of the two and a very good vaporizer that can be used and plugged in at the same time. The battery initially lasts over 2 hours of use before a charge is needed. The Air uses batteries that the user can replace and last almost a full hour. Both have great flavor and are easy to clean. They both hook up well to water tools too. The Solo is around $150 and the Air you may be able to get for $200. They have several glass mouthpieces that you can attach.

Do your homework and read up on several vaporizers and get whatever will work best for you.:cool:
 
Last edited:

howie105

Well-Known Member
Its a great choice, convenient, low maintenance, good performance and not not bad looking either. Is it perfect, no its slow to heat up unless you just let it run 24/7 and IMO it is a bit over priced. However when it comes to this vape many of my likes and dislikes are my own and so may not be relevant to your situation and expectations. Buy it and enjoy it it is a good vape like many others out there.
 

max

Out to lunch
If there's something that is more economical and/or offers a better vape experience, I'd like to know.
Not a good question Dude. Yes there are more economical vapes and yes, at least for some people, others offer a better vaping experience. But since "better vape experience" is so vague and subjective, you'd have to qualify it. In some ways my VapeXhale EVO gives me a better vaping experience, in other ways I prefer the E-Nano. What's hard to beat with the Nano is versatility. It can be a herb saving, but still satisfying vape, and used with glass, it can also deliver more 'EVO like' hits- bigger and smoother.
IMO it is a bit over priced
Compared to some popular models (plug-in and portable) at 2-4 times the price, I'd say it's a bargain. You can always get 10% off, and we just got done with a 420 sale that offered more than 20% off. Then there's the lifetime warranty for FC members.
 

howie105

Well-Known Member
Not a good question Dude. Yes there are more economical vapes and yes, at least for some people, others offer a better vaping experience. But since "better vape experience" is so vague and subjective, you'd have to qualify it. In some ways my VapeXhale EVO gives me a better vaping experience, in other ways I prefer the E-Nano. What's hard to beat with the Nano is versatility. It can be a herb saving, but still satisfying vape, and used with glass, it can also deliver more 'EVO like' hits- bigger and smoother.
Compared to some popular models (plug-in and portable) at 2-4 times the price, I'd say it's a bargain. You can always get 10% off, and we just got done with a 420 sale that offered more than 20% off. Then there's the lifetime warranty for FC members.

However when it comes to this vape many of my likes and dislikes are my own and so may not be relevant to your situation and expectations.
 
howie105,

RUDE BOY

Space is the Place
If there's something that is more economical ..., I'd like to know.

I think As big and old school as it is the Vapolution 2 is still one of the best buys out there, Love mine and hope to always have one on hand even though my epicvape ev-2 and underdogs are getting more use right now due to the size factor but when I can sit back and not worry about discretion (the vapo 2 is kinda big and has "VAPOLUTION 2 the original glass on glass vaporizer" printed on the side of it so it's hard to pass it off as something other then a vape to a 13 year old that can read) it's still my go-to vape when everyone's away or asleep.

All said the enano is also an awesome little vape as are the Underdogs both are worthy as a daily or only driver.
 

1337Dude

Well-Known Member
Not a good question Dude. Yes there are more economical vapes and yes, at least for some people, others offer a better vaping experience. But since "better vape experience" is so vague and subjective, you'd have to qualify it..

"A better experience" isn't necessarily vague. What would typically be considered a better vaporizing experience is characterized by...
- Faster heat up time
- Convenience of packing/stirring bowl
- Efficiency (amount of vapor extracted per amount of bud)
- Ability to choose temperature
- Draw suction
- Taste
- Etc.

It's up to you to weigh out which of these aspects creates a better experience for you overall. But I was pretty clear the aspect I care about most, which is efficiency. Aside from that - I don't care, I just I don't want something that is in any way a downgrade from DBV. Obviously if something is drastically more complicated to use, takes a super long time to heat up, or offers poor hit-performance in relation to DBV, I don't want those recommendations.

The EpicVape E-Nano, for example, is supposedly in upgrade in every department compared to the DBV. It heats up faster, uses less material, and supposedly delivers better-tasting and more satisfying hits.

All of these things contribute to a better vaping experience. What I want to know is what vaporizer would you recommend based on the criteria that makes it a better experience for you but within the scope of what I'm asking. I'm not looking for objective evidence, just a general rundown of a vaporizer that you like more than the DBV and why.

I understand that some vaporizers that are more efficient don't produce clouds as big as the DBV, so there may have to be some compromises in that department.

The Enano from Epicbape is an awesome vaporizer and many enjoy water tools with that unit. They come in several beautiful wood pieces. It doesn't use as much herb as my Solo and the Solo doesn't use that much. It produces really great vapor flavor and medicates with little herb.
I just recently bought 2 nanos, a very nice choice if that is what you decide on.


You may want to look at a portable because you already have a desktop. Why not check into the Arizer Air or the Solo? They have the glass air path like the Enano.

The Solo is larger of the two and a very good vaporizer that can be used and plugged in at the same time. The battery initially lasts over 2 hours of use before a charge is needed. The Air uses batteries that the user can replace and last almost a full hour. Both have great flavor and are easy to clean. They both hook up well to water tools too. The Solo is around $150 and the Air you may be able to get for $200. They have several glass mouthpieces that you can attach.

Do your homework and read up on several vaporizers and get whatever will work best for you.:cool:

Thanks, but recommending me portable vaporizers doesn't do me any good because they simply don't perform as well as desktop vapes on a desktop. There's absolutely never a time I'd need to vape that isn't at my desk, at my car, or by an outlet. I had The Lotus for that function and I've sold it. I'm also selling my DBV

Ummm..........for some, there may be better vaporizers out there for the money but for others, their DBV IS the best vaporizer for the money.
Exactly how many desktop vapes made post-2010 have these people tried before reaching that conclusion? I'm guessing not very many. If there's anyone who has an E-Nano and thinks their DBV is better, that's definitely an opinion I'd be interesting in hearing in detail.

It's a fair opinion but the fact of the matter is that the DBV is an old vaporizer and there have been innovations in technology since then. There are indisputably nicer, better performing vaporizers out there. They do what DBV does, but better. I'm sure of it. If I'm wrong, I'd love to be pointed towards any comparisons of why they like the DBV more than anything else. I have two of the damn things, but I've had them for a really long time. I'd be really really surprised if there isn't something that aims at doing the same thing, but better.

The enano by epicvape is a very nice vaporizer, but i slightly like the Underdog more. More stem options and with a vvps more fine tuned temp settings. Both are great vaporizers, both a great with water tools, and both have awesome customer service. Research them both and decide what's best for you!

I would also suggest looking into some portables, they are getting better and better.

Have you tried using the LSV (lifesaber vaporizer) wand with your dbv? That was my favorite way to use it..

Good luck and read lots before you decide!

I haven't tried using the LSV wand with my DBV. Seems like that would be hot. I can't seem to get very good hits compared to water-bonging through the usual tube because it irritates my throat a lot more. I enjoy using water if possible because it essentially eliminates the irritation in my lungs from taking lengthy draws.

Thanks everyone for the advice so far. I really appreciate it. :D
 
Last edited:
1337Dude,

lwien

Well-Known Member
The EpicVape E-Nano, for example, is supposedly in upgrade in every department compared to the DBV. It heats up faster, uses less material, and supposedly delivers better-tasting and more satisfying hits.

The DBV's heat up time is about 4 min. What is the heat up time of an E-Nano?

Thanks, but recommending me portable vaporizers doesn't do me any good because they simply don't perform as well as desktop vapes on a desktop.

That general statement is just not true.

I have both the Mini, a portable, an MFLB (a portable) and the LSV, a desktop, and I love all three of them for they provide three different experiences and I enjoy each of them for what each has to offer.

It's a fair opinion but the fact of the matter is that the DBV is an old vaporizer and there have been innovations in technology since then. There are indisputably nicer, better performing vaporizers out there. They do what DBV does, but better. I'm sure of it.

The DBV is just as viable today as it was when it was first introduced. For the money, most consider it the absolute best desktop whip based vape on the market.
 
Last edited:

hoptimum

Well-Known Member
They do what DBV does, but better. I'm sure of it.

This is very much a minority opinion, I think. For the price, few desktops can deliver the same type of mind numbing smack to the head that the DBV does (or for that matter the LSV and SSV). I've owned more than a few, including HI and UD logs. If you know of a harder hitting desktop for the price, please feel free to share.
 

stickstones

Vapor concierge
Exactly how many desktop vapes made post-2010 have these people tried before reaching that conclusion? I'm guessing not very many. If there's anyone who has an E-Nano and thinks their DBV is better, that's definitely an opinion I'd be interesting in hearing in detail.

It's a fair opinion but the fact of the matter is that the DBV is an old vaporizer and there have been innovations in technology since then. There are indisputably nicer, better performing vaporizers out there. They do what DBV does, but better. I'm sure of it. If I'm wrong, I'd love to be pointed towards any comparisons of why they like the DBV more than anything else.

This is where your noobs are showing...so I'll give it a shot! There are a LOT of vapes I prefer to the DBV, but they all cost more than $400. So without knowing it, you have taken yourself out of the improvement market. Most vapes coming out these days are portable with an intent to reach desktop performance on the road. The portables that do this best, imo, are the Crafty, Mighty and the lighter vapes like the Lotus you have already tried. I was going to recommend the Daisy to you, but if you didn't like the Lotus you might not like this one either.

Personally, I don't think a log vape is going to give you enough improvement to notice, if any at all. Check the LSV thread and you will find a few log vape owners that call the LSV a log vape on steroids. And the LSV uses the same tech as the DBV. If you are looking for a different form factor, I get it. But if you are looking for 'better' vapor for under $200, then @hoptimum is right...come tell us when you've found it and be the hero!
 

max

Out to lunch
A better experience" isn't necessarily vague.
It is when you don't qualify it, as you did with your list. It's like asking 'what's the best car?' without qualifying that question.

The EpicVape E-Nano, for example, is supposedly in upgrade in every department compared to the DBV. It heats up faster, uses less material, and supposedly delivers better-tasting and more satisfying hits.
Having lived with both models, I'd have to disagree. It doesn't heat up faster, doesn't deliver an equal amount of vapor from less herb (that's about temp and draw), and better taste and satisfying hits is subjective, and in my experience (and subjective opinion), neither has any significant advantage in those areas.
 

1337Dude

Well-Known Member
The DBV's heat up time is about 4 min. What is the heat up time of an E-Nano?
Under 2 minutes, but that's what's advertised. Max says his takes longer than his DBV.
That general statement is just not true.

I have both the Mini, a portable, an MFLB (a portable) and the LSV, a desktop, and I love all three of them for they provide three different experiences and I enjoy each of them for what each has to offer.


The DBV is just as viable today as it was when it was first introduced. For the money, most consider it the absolute best desktop whip based vape on the market.

Since you have difficulty answering the question in a way that's helpful, let me restructure the question to get the opinion I'm seeking: you could only keep one of those vaporizers til the end of time and you're stuck at your computer - what do you pick?...

And if you think MFLB hits as good as the DBV, then I wish my MFLB was as good as yours. :lol: I mean, if you really like draining batteries while not being able to control your temperature while getting relatively poor airflow...

Most people don't really consider that economical or convenient in a desktop situation.

And many consider the Volcano to be the best vaporizer, period, purely because it's all they've used. Being popular =/= being the best.

It is when you don't qualify it, as you did with your list. It's like asking 'what's the best car?' without qualifying that question.

Most people probably could easily answer that question in different aspects without pretending like it's a huge fuss to do so because it wasn't specific enough...

I mean, if I really need to narrow things further than general budget and what I'm seeking for from my vape (which I declared clearly in my OP that I'm looking for something similar to DBV or Enano), then I think you're confused about the purpose of this thread.

Person X asks "What vaporizer should I get?"
Person Y asks "You should get ABC because [insert qualifying reason]"

It's really that easy. Telling me why Person Y prefers ABC automatically tells me what criteria is being judged upon.

I'm not trying to objectively rate vaporizers as being better than another. I'm looking for subjective opinions and experiences comparing the DBV, Enano, and directly competing vaporizers. If you prefer one vape to another, it helps to say why, so I know what criteria you're judging it upon. No need to over complicate things.


Having lived with both models, I'd have to disagree. It doesn't heat up faster, doesn't deliver an equal amount of vapor from less herb (that's about temp and draw), and better taste and satisfying hits is subjective, and in my experience (and subjective opinion), neither has any significant advantage in those areas.

You've lived with both models and didn't notice that the E-nano takes <2 minutes to heat up while DBV takes longer than 4? Weird...

False advertising is definitely something I'm interested in knowing

Thanks for weighing in your opinion.

better taste and satisfying hits is subjective

I'm not looking for an objective comparison of vaporizers. What I'm asking for is subjectivity.

Personally, I don't think a log vape is going to give you enough improvement to notice, if any at all. Check the LSV thread and you will find a few log vape owners that call the LSV a log vape on steroids. And the LSV uses the same tech as the DBV. If you are looking for a different form factor, I get it. But if you are looking for 'better' vapor for under $200, then @hoptimum is right...come tell us when you've found it and be the hero!
Based on the majority opinion of people who've owned both DBV and Enano, I've read a lot of people greatly favoring the E-nano, so I might already be that hero based on e-surveying alone.

But, if I extended my budget to $400, do any extra obvious options spring to mind?

This is very much a minority opinion, I think. For the price, few desktops can deliver the same type of mind numbing smack to the head that the DBV does (or for that matter the LSV and SSV). I've owned more than a few, including HI and UD logs. If you know of a harder hitting desktop for the price, please feel free to share.
I'd be surprised if it were the minority opinion - I already asked many months ago around the 'net for opinions on vaporizers and most seemed to rate DBV being good, but not necessarily great. A lot of people don't really think DBV's vapor quality is up to snuff with newer vaporizers on the market.

DBV being put on a pedestal is really only something I've experienced here. Most people I'm aware of who own a variety of vaporizers usually prefer something else in terms of desktop vaping. Head to Reddit and DBV definitely will *not* be the most recommended desktop vape in its price range.

I can extend my budget up to $400 if that radically changes anything in terms of my options.

So far I'm still set on the Enano, and I'm considering the Underdog vaporizer, but the Enano looks much more appealing due to the faster heat up time, easier varied temp, and compatibility with water-gear.
 
Last edited:
1337Dude,

KidFated.

Unknown Member
Bigger hits with the dbv compared to a log, very clean tasting hits with a clean setup, I loved using an LSV wand. vapor quality is the same imo, you can control the how thick the hits are on each model, but it will always be easier to get hits from the dbv. If thrown on max heat the dbv doesn't take 4 minutes ime.
 

1337Dude

Well-Known Member
Bigger hits with the dbv compared to a log, very clean tasting hits with a clean setup, I loved using an LSV wand. vapor quality is the same imo, you can control the how thick the hits are on each model, but it will always be easier to get hits from the dbv. If thrown on max heat the dbv doesn't take 4 minutes ime.
So with LSV wand, you hold DBV up to your mouth? My only issue with that is it seems a bit heavy. If I had the budget, would you recommend just getting the LSV directly? If it's really that great, I'd consider it, but I'd prefer to not buy a 7th Floor Vaporizer. They have really poor business ethics (won't honor warranties on new vaporizers from other retailers), and have completely ignored me after shipping me an order that was missing items.

I usually have to wait 5 minutes before either of my DBV's can be vaped out of. Any less than that and I'm not getting decent hits. Which is why I usually avoid my DBV in a rush (and dab instead).

Also, both my DBV's have a taste associated with them. Even after cleaning my DBV's thoroughly, there's something about DBV's airway that flavors the taste. That's why the Enano also appeals to me, because it supposedly taints the herb's taste less due to its airway.

Most vapes coming out these days are portable with an intent to reach desktop performance on the road. The portables that do this best, imo, are the Crafty, Mighty and the lighter vapes like the Lotus you have already tried. I was going to recommend the Daisy to you, but if you didn't like the Lotus you might not like this one either.

I liked The Lotus. It's just not very enjoyable for me to use in relation to DBV at a desktop.

Why? Inconvenient to hit. High draw resistance.

Which is why I honestly wouldn't put the Lotus in the same realm as the DBV in terms of vaporizing performance. If the Crafty and Mighty have high draw resistances and are in any way less convenient than DBV (such as requiring me to perform a certain technique or method just to take a hit), I'm not interested. I'm also not interested in constantly monitoring battery levels or butane. Which is why I'm interested in a desktop vaporizer and not a portable. It's extremely beneficial to not be limited by a battery or butane.
 
Last edited:
1337Dude,

Dr. Plutonious

Well-Known Member
If you're willing to go up to about the $400 range, the EVO is priced at $450. If you wait for a deal on it (which happen multiple times every year), you can get a great value on one, perhaps even with some glass.

I have always been a big fan of the HI too. A VVPS takes it to the next level.
 
Dr. Plutonious,
  • Like
Reactions: 1337Dude

1337Dude

Well-Known Member
If you're willing to go up to about the $400 range, the EVO is priced at $450. If you wait for a deal on it (which happen multiple times every year), you can get a great value on one, perhaps even with some glass.

I have always been a big fan of the HI too. A VVPS takes it to the next level.

Can you tell me what makes the HI a better vape experience for you personally? In relation to the SSV, or DBV. Would you directly recommend the EVO over the HI if money weren't an issue?

I've read that you used the Sublimator. I've always been interested in that vaporizer. How would you compare these vapes to it?
 
1337Dude,

hoptimum

Well-Known Member
DBV being put on a pedestal is really only something I've experienced here. Most people I'm aware of who own a variety of vaporizers usually prefer something else in terms of desktop vaping. Head to Reddit and DBV definitely will *not* be the most recommended desktop vape in its price range.

No one here is "putting the DBV on a pedestal"; that's a straw man argument. I have 20 odd vaporizers, so to me that qualifies as a variety of vaporizers. I've only said the DBV is the best value at its price point. If it isn't, then what is? You havent responded to that yet.

I liked The Lotus. It's just not very enjoyable for me to use in relation to DBV at a desktop.

Why? Inconvenient to hit. High draw resistance.

This is an absurd statement. The Lotus has virtually zero draw resistance. How could there be?

Which leads me to my final point: your interpretations of comments that I and others have made and your definitions of terms like flavor and resistance are so idiosyncratic and foreign to my experience that you make my brain hurt. Reductive comparisons of a vaporizer like the HI with the Cloud EVO are non-sensical, and a novice oversimplification. Its apples and oranges, and youre just throwing mud against the wall until something sticks. Good luck with your next purchase.
 

lwien

Well-Known Member
you could only keep one of those vaporizers til the end of time and you're stuck at your computer - what do you pick?...

LSV

And if you think MFLB hits as good as the DBV, then I wish my MFLB was as good as yours. :lol:

Show me where I said that the MFLB hits as good as the DBV.:shrug:

I mean, if you really like draining batteries while not being able to control your temperature while getting relatively poor airflow...

First off, with any portable that does not use butane, you are draining batteries and draining batteries does not bother me in the least. Secondly, I AM able to control the temperature of the MFLB by how I hit it as well as how long I keep the battery engaged.

Most people don't really consider that economical or convenient in a desktop situation.

The MFLB is one of the most efficient vapes on the market due to it's ability to instantly apply and remove heat as well as it's restricted air flow and overall thermal design.

Like I said, I enjoy my LSV, MV and my MFLB but for different reasons. I use my MFLB primarily for maintenance hits. I use my LSV when I want an immediate massive hit to the head and I use my MV when I want to just sit back and relax while taking a few more, very tasty hits than I would with the LSV.
 
Last edited:

Dr. Plutonious

Well-Known Member
Can you tell me what makes the HI a better vape experience for you personally? In relation to the SSV, or DBV. Would you directly recommend the EVO over the HI if money weren't an issue?

I've read that you used the Sublimator. I've always been interested in that vaporizer. How would you compare these vapes to it?


I didn't mention the sublimator because it can ran over $500, especially for the new ones. Though, it is an awesome vape. I've used the Apollo head (mainly for ground herbs), the E-nailator head (designed for dabs), and the new carb cap/ double decker head (designed for double deckers, where you do a dab and a herb hit at the same time). If you're a big BHO user, I'd definitely recommend the sub. IMO, it's the best vape out there for oil (not including designated E-nails, though I'd still say it is on par with the D-nail, just a different experience). It also does herb extremely well (the Apollo head especially), it'll give you SUPER thick vapour hits. The problem is that for ground herbs, the sublimator is slow to adjust temps and it can be dangerous to use with friends.

The EVO is my all-time favourite vape. It's too easy to use, I've actually had to tell people to just hit it hard and stop worrying about the fancy techniques lol. IMO, this is the best vape for use with glass and for using with ground herb. It provides monsterous vape hits, like the Sub, but you can adjust temp a lot easier, it's smaller and a lot safer, and it fits into more glass pieces easily. Plus, I have yet to meet someone who hasn't fallen in love with it. Mine is with my cousin right now unfortunately, I just moved. But if money isn't an issue, I'd recommend this vape over any.

Keep in mind, I'm an herb over oil guy. The EVO does do oil, and it does it well, but you need a piece that can sit directly on top of the EVO and you also need the vapexnails, which are breakable. And you'll need multiple of them if you wanna do rapid dabs. Personally, I guess I like the ol' school dab motions more, so I tend to go to E-nails and the Sub for oils. I've done plenty of oil in the EVO and it's good. It's just preference. Some people on here swear by the EVO for oil.

I've owned the SSV and used the DBV many, many times. What makes the HI my personal choice over these is:

1. It's about the same price (the wait list is long, but you can find 'em used in the classifieds. I posted an ad saying I wanted to buy one over a year ago and I got a response within the day).

2. It's a direct draw vape, so the taste is a lot better since you don't need to inhale through a tube.

3. It's small. Really small. So it's about as stealthy of a desktop vape there is. It also makes it really easy to transport.

4. The craftsmanship is excellent. Alan builds each one buy hand. The guy is also a mad-scientist, so he's always making new accessories for the vape.

5. It works very well with both just a stem and with glass. I had some strawberry kush last year and I got some ridiculously flavourful hits out of it. The EVO is a taste machine too, but idk. Low temp HI hits have always been the tastiest to me.

6. It uses less herb material than the SSV or the DBV I find. At low temps, I found it just as efficient as the Purple Days (the original log vape everyone on here loved).

Other than that, the durability is about on par with 7th floor products. Alan also stands by his product in such an admirable way. The one thing I will say is you NEED a VVPS to get the full enjoyment out of the HI. I used one for a long time without a VVPS and don't get me wrong, I could make a large piece go opaque easily. But that's the thing, with just a standard adapter the HI runs quite hot. While learning the skills of the vape will allow for some adjustment, a VVPS gives you full control on temp. You can run the vape cooler than it normally would run and the taste/ efficiency of it is awesome. You can also crank the temp up if you need a bit of extra force.


In reality, the Sub, EVO, and HI are my 3 favourite desktop vapes. The EVO is my go to since I love doing monster vape rips with ground herb. I've been tempted by the Sub in the past but the fact that it's literally a scorching hot piece of metal has turned me off, since it can burn me or whoever is using it rather easily. The HI is my backup, 'chill' vape. I break it out quite regularly though, even with the EVO, just because it is still so nice. I also find it's got a better, easier draw than most log vapes.

Anyways, that's my opinion on the 3. Hope it helps!
 

blackbur

Well-Known Member
Currently, I have Da Buddah Vaporizer. I like it but I've had it for a long time and I know there are better vaporizers out there now for the money.

I've been looking at the EpicVape and it looks ideal. It's claiming to be efficient, has glass airway, heats up fast, and is pretty much at the amount of money I want to spend. But I would like compatibility with my bong because I often like to vaporize through my bong and I'm not sure how I can accommodate that.

Has anyone here used the EpicVape and can compare it to other vaporizers in the price range? If there's something that is more economical and/or offers a better vape experience, I'd like to know.

Thank you guys

This may make things easier..answer these 3 questions.

Why do you vape? (Taste..smell..stretching your stash etc)
What do you like about vaping?
What do you dislike about vaping?
 
blackbur,
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom