Looking for decent 510/ego thread carts/attomizers to use with BHO

Status
Not open for further replies.

filteredhead

Well-Known Member
You are not kidding shipping is expensive over $15 to ship two atomizers lol
Yeah, that's crazy, i guess if one wanted to get a few packs then it may be worth it, not sure actually. Anyways so I guess the shopxhale and other sites have them for a bit cheaper if just buying one pair:
http://www.amazon.com/Sticky-Wax-Bu...3CS6/ref=aag_m_pw_dp?ie=UTF8&m=A1BLNBE26VK62N
there's also the stickwaxburner.com website and there's even something new called Sticky Wax Lips which looks like the shape of the cloud pen: http://stickylipswaxburner.com/ but those sites do not seem to sell the carts by themselves.
 
filteredhead,

steven22

Well-Known Member
dang $15 is killer. decisions, pick up one whole kit for $38 shipped. or 2 atomizers for $25 shipped from 4aces. Ebay has single atomizers for $12 shipped and the full kit for $38 shipped

going to place an order tomorrow for either a whole kit or 2 atomizers if I can find the atomizers alone for cheaper.

Also the stickylips didnt appeal to me. It seems the same as the stickywaxburner except it uses a non 510 threading,pricier. Only benefit I see is it is more compact
 
steven22,

filteredhead

Well-Known Member
I do like 510 attachments so definitely know what you mean. It is just totally nuts, i saw these folks have the sticky wax burner stuff and also a clone of the ruvaped.com micro unit for like almost half the price of the website and lhs:
http://www.aaaglasspipes.com/Micro-VAPED-KIT_p_834.html
http://www.aaaglasspipes.com/search.asp?keyword=sticky&search.x=0&search.y=0&search=GO
They are showing a pair of SWB carts for $5.50, not sure what they charge for shipping though. I've never bought from them, they show a SoCal address and also list atmos thermo for way cheaper too. the sales on these pens must be blowing up, everyone and their grandmother is selling them it seems.
 
filteredhead,

steven22

Well-Known Member
A seller has told me there are actually 2 versions of the sticky wax atomizers. and not the 1.6 vs 2.2.

Old ones did not have a resistance rating and had more shallow bow and came in 2 packs.

The new ones come in a single pack and have a rating of 1.6 or 2.2.

seller didnt provide any pics... If anyone else can confirm that would be cool
 
steven22,

steven22

Well-Known Member
Im guessing this is the newer design atomizer. Looks like it has a deeper bowl, red washer, slightly different shaped funnel compared to what filteredhead posted in the last page
111stickywax_1.png
 
steven22,

mmenzie

My friends call me "Menz"
thermovape dart (I don't think this is 510/ego threaded though)
the Dart is 510 threaded and will work on EGO batteries. i have a dart i use on my EGO-C Upgraded battery. just make sure you use the "LV" (Low voltage) version of the Dart
 
mmenzie,

steven22

Well-Known Member
I found the atomizer that is used in the 710 mini which is one of the designs I really liked. This is from ruvaped.com they have something identical called the micro vape for $70. The atomizer and mouthpiece is $30.
http://www.ruvaped.com/shop/skillet-attachment/

can anyone confirm that this is 510 threaded? and can fit the ego c twist?. Anyone know if these can be had for cheaper? (generic). $30+ shipping is pretty pricey for one atomizer.
 
steven22,

josh mac

socalog
Nice, that looks exactly like the atmos f5 atomizer. How much was it?

Not sure what could be done about the wastage. A buddy of mine with the f5 pulled the outter sleave and funnel off. Exposing only the coil and then dropped his concentrates right on the coil

I dont know if your in so cal. Spot in santa ana on 17th. Its was 20 bucks...
The more i use it, i can figure it out more now. Its all about how long you hold the button and what not. Can load that much in there either. I get a solid 4-5 hits, but nothing to crazy with the high
 
josh mac,

steven22

Well-Known Member
yeah, I figured you just need to load it more carefully with the right amount of heat.

------

for the others, I am now really liking the micro vaped Glass globe attachment. They sell the glass globe attachments individually and it looks like a high quality unit. More-so than the sticky wax burner atomizers.
 
steven22,

SSVUN~YAH

You Must Unlearn, What You Have Learned...
Steven check out the vaporizer on zainy.net, it might be what you are looking for? Imo much better deal than one atty for 30 bucks!
 
SSVUN~YAH,

farscaper

Well-Known Member
My buddy loves his phoenix rebuildable atty, its a drip style... He uses stainless steel mesh for "wick" material and wraps (well I wrapped the last one and it held for some time) with canthal wire... So u buy the atty shell and rebuild it when it quits working, easy to claim from. Im trying to finaggle a tank system with the kanger evod, but this works and is cheap!

Here is a cheaper clone: http://www.discountvapers.com/phoenix-rebuildable-atomizer-clone/
 
farscaper,
  • Like
Reactions: SSVUN~YAH

steven22

Well-Known Member
Hey guys, well I ended up getting the micro vaped Glass globe attachment.

I received it and used it for 2 days. It seems pretty nice and I like the functionality of it. Very easy to load, easy to see when your dab is spent and needs to be reloaded.

I wish the globe had a tighter seal to the bottom 510 adapter. (held by 2 rubber washers). Mine doesn't have too much tension there. because of that and the fact of it being glass, It isnt as pocket friendly for me. I now keep the glass globe attachment in a separate pouch with out the battery.

Also, though it vapes very well, I notice that oil drips off the coil and collects in the ceramic bowl. It seems to vape really slowly in there. I actually scrape it up carefully with a paperclip and spread it back on the coil.

All in all, this will do for now, good price too, $40 for 4 nails and a globe

I probably will pick up their original skilllet and mouth piece since it isnt fragile.

20130418_105420_zps46762996.jpg
20130418_105628_zpsed8f3db2.jpg
20130418_105529_zpsb2dabc2b.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom