How about "butane content". If anyone has doubts they could send it out to verify on their own. People would start to get a bad rep if they got caught lying.
Not accurate? Preposterous!No one I know of tests for residuals. Basically you can claim anything you want for something from a dispensary.
There are NO (zero, zilch, none) consumer regulations, laws or protections. You are a lab rat. Not a patient.
And the con artist cannabis testing being done currently is a cruel joke on patients designed to con you.
You are 100% on your own, just like a back alley buy. Do you remember the meat packing industry of the 1930's? Welcome to the Greens packing industry of the 10's.
The collective I belong to has it's own LC and GC for testing, with appropriate calibration standards. You would be surprised how much ours varies from the "major" labs (frackin facepalm). People actually buy products by how much THC-A is in them, when THC-A isn't useable by your body! "Testing" is just bragging rights for dispensaries. It allows them to sell more.
Most people haven't a clue as to why a THC-A level doesn't mean much to your body that takes in THC and not THC-A and converts it to 11-hydroxy-THC that you body actually can use.. But it doe$ mean profit$ when they are bagging up your 94% THC-A Uber wax. (it's only a 47% THC concentrate when fully decarbed!) We have checked many samples tested by the well known labs only to find MAJOR discrepancies in EVERY sample.
But to be honest butane is the very last thing I would worry about being in my hash. I'd worry about nerve poisons like insecticides, herbicides, fungicides and non approved "plant enhancers and growth regulators" that are already considered too dangerous for FOOD but are used on your MEDICINE daily...
Besides butane residue isn't really harmful. You inhale 1000x the amount of unburnt hydrocarbons daily, just from sources around you. It's the contaminants and lubricating oils in canned butane that are unhealthy, not the gas itself. If you are hunting down what is hazardous, look at what your weed was fed on and sprayed with. And that's ALL weed that you didn't grow....not just concentrates.
There is quality, accurate lab testing being done every day. I have dealt with both Steep Hill Labs in Oakland as well as Halent Laboratories in Sacramento and have found absolutely no reason to doubt the accuracy of their analyses nor their results.
It's easy to pontificate on a subject, but until proof can be shown conclusively that a specific lab's published results are shoddy, inaccurate or "made up", any opinion is just that, an opinion.
Also, the use of pontificate seems very strange, was someone speaking like a pontiff?
Yes, I trust them and yes I have had same strain samples tested by different labs. It's part of my business' regular routine.You may have no reason to doubt them, but do you have reason to trust them? Have you done anything like send a piece of the same extract to more than one lab to see if the results are the same?
Seriously? You question my use of "opinion" over "conjecture" and yet don't understand the use of pontificate?fake name said:Also, the use of pontificate seems very strange, was someone speaking like a pontiff?
Yes, I trust them and yes I have had same strain samples tested by different labs. It's my business.
Seriously? You question my use of "opinion" over "conjecture" and yet don't understand the use of pontificate?
Any experience with SC Labs though? The guys built into weedmaps.comThere is quality, accurate lab testing being done every day. I have dealt with both Steep Hill Labs in Oakland as well as Halent Laboratories in Sacramento and have found absolutely no reason to doubt the accuracy of their analyses nor their results.
It's easy to pontificate on a subject, but until proof can be shown conclusively that a specific lab's published results are shoddy, inaccurate or "made up", any opinion is just that, an opinion.
Only one contact with SC Labs so I'll refrain from commenting on their validity. I generally ignore anything connected with weedmaps.com.Any experience with SC Labs though? The guys built into weedmaps.com
That's the testing I posted earlier in the thread with "Safety Screens: Untested".
What test determines "freshness"?SD_haze said:Honestly I mainly have used concentrate lab testing to try to confirm how FRESH the concentrate is.
It's more an issue with retail weedmaps dispensaries down here.. How long it has been sitting on their shelf in a pre-weighed half gram plastic container. After 2 months in those things, it simply doesn't smell as strongOnly one contact with SC Labs so I'll refrain from commenting on their validity. I generally ignore anything connected with weedmaps.com.
What test determines "freshness"?
Since a lot of dispensaries down here pre-weigh concentrates down to half grams, and store them in PLASTIC containers, they aren't air tight and oxidation does happen.I dont see how a properly prepared (ie stable, not a wax) and stored concentrate "expires" i have some liquid nitro extracted hash i have had for about a yr and a half and its still potent as far as i can tell lol. I keep all my concentrates in air tight jars out of the light.
Didnt they find some herb from a monk that was like 2000+ years old and it was stilla basically fine?
That's the other part I forgot to add.Ya but if your concentrate is stable and isn't a wax shouldn't it be almost nil? A wax I totally understand cause it has air and moisture whipped into it and will oxidize and loose terps rapidly but a shatter shouldn't I would think......