Just can’t decide between the Fury Edge and Mighty

[Monk Debate]

I do remember pet rocks! Seems like the kind of thing someone would come up with after a bowl or two.

 

[shredder]

I've bought 5 F2's, and have ordered an edge. I've also bought 2 mightys, the first one five years ago next month.

I gave away all the F2's. Four were gifts. I still have both mightys.

I like both, and agree the edge is a nice vape, but like most vape critics, I vote the mighty Numero Uno.

 

[invertedisdead]

I was starting to question myself reading these posts, but I just cleaned the cooling unit and water pipe adapter right now and it couldn't have taken more than 1 minute. Ziploc + ISO in the microwave for 10 seconds. Cooling unit unlocked and split into two pieces.

I don't find the CU takes any longer to clean than an Arizer stem. I would argue Arizer stems let more particulate through and need more frequent cleaning. I never get scooby snax with the Mighty.

But all of these portables have compromising designs in some way with regards to air path purity. That's why the Vapcap is still one of the cleanest portable designs on the market. Of course it's not the convection dominant vapor most of us prefer, either...

Frans: My superior German engineering sensibilities lead me to propose that we use plastic!

To be fair S&B has been using thermoplastics for like 20 years in their vaporizers. Solid valve anybody?
I would assume because it's more durable than glass, less conductive than metal, and easier to tool to tight tolerances.

Edit: Damn I just watched Troy's Fury Edge vs Fury 2 video...

Think I'll be sticking with the Mighty!

 

[John Coaltrain]

. . . I don't find the CU takes any longer to clean than an Arizer stem. . . .

So . . .

• Spinning the CU off the unit . . .
  
• Taking the locking mechanism off the CU . . .
  
• prying the CU apart . . .
  
• removing the mouthpiece . . .
  
• removing the 3 seals . . .

Takes the same amount of time as:

• Dropping the Arizer stem into a bag of iso?

Maybe it's my technique that was faulty.

No thanks. I'll pass on the plastic device with the titanium price.

 

[invertedisdead]

So . . .

• Spinning the CU off the unit . . .
  
• Taking the locking mechanism off the CU . . .
  
• prying the CU apart . . .
  
• removing the mouthpiece . . .
  
• removing the 3 seals . . .

Takes the same amount of time as:

• Dropping the Arizer stem into a bag of iso

Maybe it's my technique that was faulty.

No thanks. I'll pass on the titanium-priced plastic device.

I think it took me longer to read your list than that actually takes.

Why remove the seals? It spends such a short time in ISO, I don't bother. I treat it just like my Solid Valve.
Are you removing the O-rings from your Dynavap condenser?

Because realistically, without removing the O-rings, we're talking, what? 5 seconds?

I don't remove the mouthpiece, it gets cleaned too. You slide the lock back, split into two parts, and drop into warm ISO. Shake, shake, rinse, done.

And I would argue Arizer stems take more frequent cleaning as they let so much particulate through the glass screen.

I actually fired up my Arizer for curiosities sake a little while ago. We must have two totally different devices, the AVB is SO uneven in my stems. Polar opposite of what comes out of the Mighty.

And they are all wasteful with weed compared to a desktop plugin like the Flowerpot IMO.

 

[John Coaltrain]

Sure, dude. Sure.

 

[bossman]

Fuck those honeycomb screens for real though. The dome screen in my Fierce stem helps a lot but I sadly never about that in my Solo II days.

 

[John Coaltrain]

Fuck those honeycomb screens for real though. The dome screen in my Fierce stem helps a lot but I sadly never {ed. "thought"?} about that in my Solo II days.

Domed screens in Arizer stems are fantastic. They decrease draw resistance (by preventing the four little holes from becoming clogged) and they stop Scooby snacks in their tracks.

Perhaps the Arizer team might have benefited by consulting some of those consummate German engineers. I can almost hear them now . . .

Hans: Your price is too low, the unit heats up too fast, and you don't utilize enough plastic.​

 

[LesPlenty]

Plastic test tubes are great for Arizer stems, I purchased 10 or so AA stems with the black plastic tip for about $40 so I would always have a nice clean stem to use, that many CUs for the Mighty would cost $250!
I am a bong man at home and would pick my Tera over my Mighty 99 times out of 100 for that purpose.
I still think the Mighty is good... at US$223 when on sale but fuck paying US$335 RRP for that fucking dinosaur.

 

[dzunk]

I can compare cleaning of e-nano (glass stem) and crafty. With enano i push out the screen and throw the stem and screen into iso. With crafty i have to take off the cu, dissasemble the cu(which i dont mind very much) soak it into iso and then take it out and clean the whole insides of cu with qtips. Otherwise its not 100% clean. And that whole process takes at least 5-7 minutes. I have never tried to use microwave oven though(as i dont own one).

also troy and other vape reviewers all say that for a waterpiece terra is better than mighty. But still troy says mighty is the best vaporizer. My problem with crafty/mighty is the extraction. With my enano i get get totaly black abv and when i need to get rid of pain, i do that every time, since the last part(from brown to black abv) gives me the most pain relief-even though its not tasty or anything, its just needed. And sab vapes just cant deliver this kind of power...

 

[invertedisdead]

Hans: Is that a 10 cent ceramic donut heater?
Anders: Ah, Yeah, eh!

that whole process takes at least 5-7 minutes. I have never tried to use microwave oven though(as i dont own one).

Warm solvent is much more effective.

 

[GoldenBud]

Can someone help me out here? I’ve got analysis paralysis here.

My use case is something I can use on and off during the day, 2-3 hits without much trouble or prep. On weekends, I like to share with 2 others who are not regular users, talking about 10-20 hits or so total for all 3 of us there in a night. We do sometimes use something on the go, like in a car before entering a business. I’m fine with a session vape, as long as it’s not something that takes forever to prep and use. I’d ideally like to have something prepped for several days like dosing capsules or something easy to load and use. I don’t need huge bowls.

I have a starry now. I find the flavor lacking, and the restricted air flow and cleaning annoying. I don’t wind up using it much compared to concentrates which I am trying to move away from.

Edge- I like everything I have read about this. Positive impressions all over the place. Seems to be great for a lot of reasons. According to Troy from 420vapezone, it graphed out as perfectly shareable, resulted in many hits, good flavor and overall worked great. He didn’t even use the bubbler or the glass stem options. It’s small, it’s versatile, great attachments, and it has a clean air path. I like the idea of a 3d glass stem and bubbler attachment. It’s easy to load and clean. It seems like a winner except I do value flavor and smoothness over most other stuff, and not sure if it’s going to be as good as he Mighty in that regard.

Mighty- this one has the rep. It’s supposedly better in flavor and smoothness. But it’s hard to say just how much. I don’t see too many other advantages but I sort of have FOMO. I don’t love the proprietary charger, large bowl size, cleaning etc. Is it worth it over the edge when it comes to flavor and smoothness? I don’t care too much about portability, but as I mentioned we do sometimes take something out.

Since I can’t just try these both out, what’s the best option here?

Solo II is the almost like a Mighty and cost 200$ with alot of accessories ..
Fury II is not as good as the Solo II In my opinion.

 

[CANtalk]

FWIW. YMMV.

 

[dzunk]

All of these reviews are by heavy users. Vandal obviously isnt a heavy user. Also its hard fo justify the pricetag of mighty. Yeah it might have better vapor, but is it twice as good as solo or fierce? In troys video the curves of rips quality of fierce and mighty were really close-at some point they met and then mighty was worse. I cant tell that mighty has worse vapor quality, cause i dont think that, but i dont think the difference is worth the money. If money is no issue, get a mighty, or crafty if you are ok with 5-6bowls per charge. If you dont want to spend 300+ dollars and want a high quality vape fierce wont dissapoint you either.

 

[Jill NYC]

@Vandal I think you would be very happy with the Edge for your purposes.

I have a Crafty and while I still like it - the heat up time AND how quickly the flavor goes from great to TERRIBLE makes it hard to recommend for your needs.
The Edge, with the bent glass mouthpiece, is still pocketable, easy to reload (especially with the Edge capsules) and the flavor lasts much longer.
You can also just put in a small amount, take a few hits and go about your day in less time than it would take for the Mighty to heat up.

Good luck with choosing - make sure to let us know what you decide and how it works out.

 

[david8613]

i have had quite a few vapes, davinci iq, boudless cfv, cfx, ghost mv1, dayna vap, splinter, splinter z, plenty, I like them all really, but my wifey likes the mighty most because its light, super easy to use, she can sip how she wants, no long draws or special technique needed to get vapor. we have been using the mighty a lot lately but the past few nights I ran my splinter z, and that thing is a beast. she didn't like it because of the long draw technique, and using glass mouth piece she Is not used to it yet.

 

[1nd3cEnt]

I much prefer my Mighty to my Arizer Air, not even close! But the big issue with the Mighty is price & downtime due to recharging.

The big advance in recent portable vaporizer technology is the physical separation of power supply from atomizer. The Mighty, along with the MV1 Ghost, for example, incorporate power supply & atty in one unit. This "old" approach is no longer really necessary, nor really that advisable. The future belongs to the 510 flower vaporisers: these provide all types of power supply modes: Wattage mode, TC, etc. The user never needs to worry about power. And of course, correctly-configured mods can be used with any 510 flower or concentrate vape.

 

[LesPlenty]

The future belongs to the 510 flower vaporisers

I doubt it, simple ease of use seems more likely, my Boundless Terp Pen would be perfect if it had an app for temp control and optional coils etc. No buttons to push, simple draw activation, I still can't believe how little a toke is needed for it to self fire, amazing shit for $25.
Also my F2 is tiny compared to a mod and atty.

 

[GoldenBud]

I think the future of vaping is a desktop/portable device all in one. the user can choose which voltage he needs: if at home 12V, if portable like 3.7-5V , adjustable... because saying 510 vapes is the future is abit problematic : although it has completely isolated battery from heater, if you leave it in your backpack and something clicks on the fire button then it'll fire until the device burned ..