Andreaerdna
If God is the answer, then the question is wrong
I am reading some "earth friendly", low impact kind of talk or marketing BS like this applyied to vapes.
It seems that using a wooden housing put a vape in an environmental sustainable self claiming position (while using a 18650 battery that is a concentrate of chemical waste)
I mean, desktop units use AC or DC so if it is green energy they are less environmental aggressive I guess
I think seriously that only butane vapes should be entitled to claim a label of sustainability (amongs portables): a wooden art oject like @vapman or clever solutions like @VapCap or @StickyBricks or what seems to be a buthane sublimator, meaning @supreme or butane log @lotus but also @vaponic or @hammer plus all the pletora of butane vapes should be the only ones entitled to be labeled as sustainable vaporizers as they use nearly 0 or none electronics and a relatively clean power source.
That being said it is no news that marketing / branding tells stories (in order to sell) not the true
It seems that using a wooden housing put a vape in an environmental sustainable self claiming position (while using a 18650 battery that is a concentrate of chemical waste)
I mean, desktop units use AC or DC so if it is green energy they are less environmental aggressive I guess
I think seriously that only butane vapes should be entitled to claim a label of sustainability (amongs portables): a wooden art oject like @vapman or clever solutions like @VapCap or @StickyBricks or what seems to be a buthane sublimator, meaning @supreme or butane log @lotus but also @vaponic or @hammer plus all the pletora of butane vapes should be the only ones entitled to be labeled as sustainable vaporizers as they use nearly 0 or none electronics and a relatively clean power source.
That being said it is no news that marketing / branding tells stories (in order to sell) not the true