OF
Well-Known Member
The topic of the (known?) advantage of an 'isolated vapor path', or even better an 'isolated air path' being an important feature comes up from time to time. Currently WRT Solo II. In the past I've questioned this on various vape threads from time to time when it was a popular topic, asking for any scientific evidence of it's importance. I'm not even sure what the supposed risk is, some mysterious vapors from hot electronics?
I've pointed out that the computer I use certainly is a bigger threat if it's real, being on longer, using more power and having a fan to blow the offending vapors around the room. Like the vents in TV sets and monitors must also do?
I've been unable to find any documentation of this risk, nor has anyone pointed to any. I think if it was a real risk makers would be using it a LOT in advertising to claim their vape was safer than the competitors. But that needs identification of the risk and testing of different models. Or the very real risk of law suits would block such claims? If, OTOH, the risk was not legitimate we'd end up just where we are......
So I've decided to ask what I hope is a broader audience here. Does anyone have any proof, or even evidence, that this is a risk worth our attention? Otherwise I fear we may have a 'red herring' scare driving health concerned Members away from otherwise excellent vapes they might explore.
Anyway, does anyone know, specifically, what threat to our health may exist here?
TIA. Best wishes to all for a healthy, happy and productive New Year.
OF
I've pointed out that the computer I use certainly is a bigger threat if it's real, being on longer, using more power and having a fan to blow the offending vapors around the room. Like the vents in TV sets and monitors must also do?
I've been unable to find any documentation of this risk, nor has anyone pointed to any. I think if it was a real risk makers would be using it a LOT in advertising to claim their vape was safer than the competitors. But that needs identification of the risk and testing of different models. Or the very real risk of law suits would block such claims? If, OTOH, the risk was not legitimate we'd end up just where we are......
So I've decided to ask what I hope is a broader audience here. Does anyone have any proof, or even evidence, that this is a risk worth our attention? Otherwise I fear we may have a 'red herring' scare driving health concerned Members away from otherwise excellent vapes they might explore.
Anyway, does anyone know, specifically, what threat to our health may exist here?
TIA. Best wishes to all for a healthy, happy and productive New Year.
OF