uncanni
Well-Known Member
Very interesting discussion, and I appreciate the level of civility being maintained.
We all understand that there's a lot of ideological investment in cannabis as either very good or very bad. By ideol. investmnt, I mean deep political and financial investments in a given social and cultural "operation." It's what keeps those in power, in power.
When people are irrationally attached to an idée fixe--like Jeff Sessions is--no amount of evidence will make them budge. He is ideologically committed to maintaining his views on cannabis until something comes along that would have a real impact on his world view; I can't imagine what it would be other than some huge financial gain he'd stand to make without rocking the boat of his pretend religious fundamentalism.
We see these ideological investments at work in many institutions, i.e., judicial, governmental, financial, corporate, and popular pot culture (like all the myths that many people quote as scientific truth without evidence). A lot of cannabis advocates just want to make money. We hope that most scientific studies are objective rather than driven in certain directions by funding. This is where I'm skeptical, because the bottom line (speaking for USA) is always profit, capital.
We all know how extremely powerful big pharma is. What if cannabis is legalized everywhere and people stop using shit tons of prescribed meds? Yeegads, they can't allow THAT to happen!
So I guess I'm still a conspiracy theorist as far as cannacapitalism goes: If the rising superpower (legal cannabis) were ever to provoke the decline and fall of the old superpower (big pharma), that would be because the really big bucks were to be made... you guessed it, in cannacapitalism.
Which is why I prefer to be an outlaw grower.
We all understand that there's a lot of ideological investment in cannabis as either very good or very bad. By ideol. investmnt, I mean deep political and financial investments in a given social and cultural "operation." It's what keeps those in power, in power.
When people are irrationally attached to an idée fixe--like Jeff Sessions is--no amount of evidence will make them budge. He is ideologically committed to maintaining his views on cannabis until something comes along that would have a real impact on his world view; I can't imagine what it would be other than some huge financial gain he'd stand to make without rocking the boat of his pretend religious fundamentalism.
We see these ideological investments at work in many institutions, i.e., judicial, governmental, financial, corporate, and popular pot culture (like all the myths that many people quote as scientific truth without evidence). A lot of cannabis advocates just want to make money. We hope that most scientific studies are objective rather than driven in certain directions by funding. This is where I'm skeptical, because the bottom line (speaking for USA) is always profit, capital.
We all know how extremely powerful big pharma is. What if cannabis is legalized everywhere and people stop using shit tons of prescribed meds? Yeegads, they can't allow THAT to happen!
So I guess I'm still a conspiracy theorist as far as cannacapitalism goes: If the rising superpower (legal cannabis) were ever to provoke the decline and fall of the old superpower (big pharma), that would be because the really big bucks were to be made... you guessed it, in cannacapitalism.
Which is why I prefer to be an outlaw grower.